Taiwan faces an unprecedented threat from China in the form of intelligence operations and social infiltration, the Washington-based Global Taiwan Institute (GTI) wrote in a report, urging tougher measures to deal with the problem.
The GTI recommended imposing stricter penalties for espionage and suggested that Taiwan establish legal frameworks requiring people acting on behalf of foreign entities to register and publicly disclose their activities and affiliations to enhance transparency.
The report came after recent comments from President William Lai (賴清德), who suggested tightening restrictions on Chinese tourists, Chinese residents and civil servants.
“China is already a foreign hostile force, as defined in our Anti-Infiltration Act,” The Straits Times on March 14 cited Lai as saying the day before.
If the government recognizes China as a hostile force, then it would be apt to make travel to China illegal for current or recently retired public-sector employees and military personnel. Arguably, the itineraries and movements of those visiting from China should also be highly scrutinized.
Naturally, the deep economic interdependence of Taiwan and China means that efforts to curb Chinese influence in Taiwan would face obstacles. While several countries — including Taiwan and the US — have voiced intentions to economically decouple from China, progress has been limited. Decoupling remains challenging due to China’s central role in global supply chains, its status as a major investor worldwide and its substantial holdings of foreign debt.
The government’s hands are tied, as taking action against influencers producing pro-China content leaves it open to accusations of infringing on free speech — a fundamental freedom that distinguishes Taiwan from authoritarian China.
Meanwhile, Taiwanese businesses that have operations in China would be subject to the whims and demands of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), which would encourage businesses to lobby politicians to enact policies favorable to the CCP. Resisting the demands of those businesses might not be in the government’s best interest, given the large amount of taxes they pay and the number of people they employ.
However, that is not to say that Taiwan should do nothing about China’s acts of espionage and infiltration. The best approach might be greater transparency and stricter punishments for the most egregious contraventions, as suggested by the GTI report.
Those producing pro-China content online should be required to publicly disclose their funding sources, while officials found guilty of intelligence gathering or recruitment for China should face a minimum sentence of 10 years in prison. In addition, they could have all their assets confiscated and be barred from leaving Taiwan after serving their sentence — measures designed to prevent them from stashing assets in China and relocating there upon release. Such strict penalties would serve as a strong deterrent against collusion with Beijing.
It should go without saying that any public sector worker or members of the military found colluding with China should be stripped of all commendations and have their pensions forfeited. However, in a democratic nation such as Taiwan, where personal privacy is protected, detecting collusion with China remains a major challenge — and Beijing is aware of that. People can easily communicate with Chinese handlers through encrypted online platforms, meet with CCP proxies operating within Taiwan or rendezvous with Chinese agents in other countries under the pretense of tourism.
In a stark reminder of China’s persistent territorial overreach, Pema Wangjom Thongdok, a woman from Arunachal Pradesh holding an Indian passport, was detained for 18 hours at Shanghai Pudong Airport on Nov. 24 last year. Chinese immigration officials allegedly informed her that her passport was “invalid” because she was “Chinese,” refusing to recognize her Indian citizenship and claiming Arunachal Pradesh as part of South Tibet. Officials had insisted that Thongdok, an Indian-origin UK resident traveling for a conference, was not Indian despite her valid documents. India lodged a strong diplomatic protest, summoning the Chinese charge d’affaires in Delhi and demanding
Immediately after the Chinese People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) “Justice Mission” exercise at the end of last year, a question was posed to Indian Ministry of External Affairs spokesperson Randhir Jaiswal regarding recent developments involving the exercises around Taiwan, and how he viewed their impact on regional peace and stability. His answer was somewhat perplexing to me as a curious student of Taiwanese affairs. “India closely follows developments across the Indo-Pacific region,” he said, adding: “We have an abiding interest in peace and stability in the region, in view of our significant trade, economic, people-to-people, and maritime interests. We urge all concerned
In the past 72 hours, US Senators Roger Wicker, Dan Sullivan and Ruben Gallego took to social media to publicly rebuke the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) over the defense budget. I understand that Taiwan’s head is on the chopping block, and the urgency of its security situation cannot be overstated. However, the comments from Wicker, Sullivan and Gallego suggest they have fallen victim to a sophisticated disinformation campaign orchestrated by an administration in Taipei that treats national security as a partisan weapon. The narrative fed to our allies claims the opposition is slashing the defense budget to kowtow to the Chinese
In a Taipei Times editorial published almost three years ago (“Macron goes off-piste,” April 13, 2023, page 8), French President Emmanuel Macron was criticized for comments he made immediately after meeting Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) in Beijing. Macron had spoken of the need for his country to find a path on Chinese foreign policy no longer aligned with that of the US, saying that continuing to follow the US agenda would sacrifice the EU’s strategic autonomy. At the time, Macron was criticized for gifting Xi a PR coup, and the editorial said that he had been “persuaded to run