Difficulties in military recruitment have led President William Lai (賴清德) to announce increased allowances for voluntary military service personnel and combat troops. Beginning on Tuesday, the allowance for lower-ranking soldiers and enlisted soldiers is to rise from NT$10,000 to NT$15,000, demonstrating substantial care for our nation’s military personnel.
Minister of National Defense Wellington Koo (顧立雄) told the legislature that the increase reflects the government’s care for soldiers and officers. The biggest increase would be for lower-ranking personnel. The combat unit allowance increase would mainly target soldiers in more demanding combat roles, who would see an increase from NT$5,000 to NT$12,000. This new policy aims to attract outstanding talent to join the military and encourage them to serve long-term.
As for military personnel who are not eligible for this wave of allowance increases, but still require support — including specialized personnel in fields like combat air traffic control units, electronic reconnaissance and cyberwarfare — there might be a second wave of compensation adjustments on the horizon, which would be announced upon approval by the Executive Yuan.
With the enemy threat growing day by day, combat readiness tasks for military personnel are becoming increasingly arduous. Additionally, competition among industries to recruit talent — combined with the impact of low birthrates — has led to a lack of willingness among young people to enlist in the military. All of these factors impact combat readiness. The government has been working to promote improvements in the treatment and benefits of military personnel for some time. To strengthen national defense and maintain security in the Taiwan Strait, enhancing military benefits is not only a short-term solution to address the decline in personnel — it is also a long-term investment in talent. This latest measure would bring multiple benefits to the military, talent stability and improved efficiency.
The Supreme Prosecutor’s Office recently said that the number of criminal cases involving military personnel — including those related to contravening duty and discipline — has steadily climbed each year for the past decade. Moreover, the targets of infiltration by Chinese organizations have expanded from high-ranking officers to include lower-ranking, non-commissioned officers and enlisted soldiers.
Defense and combat readiness are matters that impact the entire nation. The Ministry of National Defense must have the power to move citizens’ hearts and minds to establish a sense of honor, allowing military service to become a source of great pride. Voluntary service personnel are the backbone of our military — thus, we must work to cultivate their sense of honor and responsibility.
Aside from improving treatment and benefits, and strengthening the motivation of the good men and women who serve our country, we must also cultivate advanced skills and impart deeper knowledge within the military. Military service should become a platform for honing skills and fostering talents — much like a university or vocational school. Not only would voluntary service personnel be eager to serve, but even conscripts would be enthusiastic about joining the military.
To counter Chinese espionage and improve personnel in the military, military compensation and troop morale must be addressed simultaneously. It is particularly important that the momentum behind the military’s innovation and sense of heritage be recovered — soldiers will find true courage and determination only when they understand who they are fighting for and why.
Chao Hsuey-wen is an assistant professor.
Translated by Kyra Gustavsen
There is much evidence that the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) is sending soldiers from the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) to support Russia’s invasion of Ukraine — and is learning lessons for a future war against Taiwan. Until now, the CCP has claimed that they have not sent PLA personnel to support Russian aggression. On 18 April, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelinskiy announced that the CCP is supplying war supplies such as gunpowder, artillery, and weapons subcomponents to Russia. When Zelinskiy announced on 9 April that the Ukrainian Army had captured two Chinese nationals fighting with Russians on the front line with details
On a quiet lane in Taipei’s central Daan District (大安), an otherwise unremarkable high-rise is marked by a police guard and a tawdry A4 printout from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs indicating an “embassy area.” Keen observers would see the emblem of the Holy See, one of Taiwan’s 12 so-called “diplomatic allies.” Unlike Taipei’s other embassies and quasi-consulates, no national flag flies there, nor is there a plaque indicating what country’s embassy this is. Visitors hoping to sign a condolence book for the late Pope Francis would instead have to visit the Italian Trade Office, adjacent to Taipei 101. The death of
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT), joined by the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), held a protest on Saturday on Ketagalan Boulevard in Taipei. They were essentially standing for the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), which is anxious about the mass recall campaign against KMT legislators. President William Lai (賴清德) said that if the opposition parties truly wanted to fight dictatorship, they should do so in Tiananmen Square — and at the very least, refrain from groveling to Chinese officials during their visits to China, alluding to meetings between KMT members and Chinese authorities. Now that China has been defined as a foreign hostile force,
On April 19, former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) gave a public speech, his first in about 17 years. During the address at the Ketagalan Institute in Taipei, Chen’s words were vague and his tone was sour. He said that democracy should not be used as an echo chamber for a single politician, that people must be tolerant of other views, that the president should not act as a dictator and that the judiciary should not get involved in politics. He then went on to say that others with different opinions should not be criticized as “XX fellow travelers,” in reference to