Israel’s genocide was only on pause: For Palestinians woken on Monday night last week by a vicious wave of airstrikes, the resumption was no less shocking. More than 400 people — many of them children — were slaughtered in a matter of hours, in an assault that reportedly received the “green light” from US President Donald Trump. That mayhem was swiftly followed by evacuation orders — that is, forced displacement — raising the possibility of renewed ground operations. Israel’s excuse? A confected claim that Hamas has not observed the terms of January’s so-called ceasefire agreement — the terms of which Israel itself has broken over and over again.
In the wake of the attacks, CNN reported that Israel’s onslaught threw “doubt on the fragile ceasefire.” Orwellian does not even begin to describe such framing. As it is, there was no “ceasefire”: not if your definition is firing ceasing. A single Israeli has been reported to have died in Gaza during the “ceasefire”: a contractor killed by the Israeli army, who mistook him for a Palestinian. A reported 150 Palestinians have been killed in Gaza during that “ceasefire,” and dozens others butchered in the West Bank.
Here is an example of how Israeli violence is endlessly indulged and Palestinian life is stripped of any meaning. If just one Israeli soldier had been killed by a Hamas militant, many politicians and media outlets would have immediately pronounced the ceasefire over. That same narrative is why we are led to believe that peace prevailed before Oct. 7, 2023, even when 238 Palestinians — 44 of them children — had been killed in the previous nine months.
Future generations might well ask: “How was a crime that obscene facilitated for so long?” After all, thanks to mobile phones and the Internet, no crime in history has been so well documented by its victims as it happened. As they have done for 529 days, Gaza’s survivors post the evidence of their own extermination on social media, hoping — in vain — that enough consciences would be pricked to end the genocidal mayhem. A dead baby in a rainbow jumpsuit; a grieving father playing with the pigtail of his daughter for the last time; entire families covered in shrouds, their bloodlines wiped from the civil registry.
No crime has been so evidenced by experts as it happened. Last week, a new UN report detailed Israel’s sexual and reproductive violence: the killing of pregnant women, the rape of male detainees with objects ranging from vegetables to broomsticks, the destruction of an in vitro fertilization clinic with its 4,000 embryos. Waging war on Palestinians’ ability to reproduce were termed “genocidal acts.”
There are limitless examples of other such acts. Report after report has detailed Israel’s destruction of civilian infrastructure — homes, hospitals, schools, universities, mosques and churches; its obliteration of 83 percent of all plant life, more than 80 percent of agricultural land, 95 percent of cattle; and its ruin of more than 80 percent of water and sanitation infrastructure. Israel has deliberately and systematically rendered Gaza uninhabitable. That is why — from Amnesty International to academics such as Omer Bartov, the world-renowned Israeli-American professor of Holocaust and genocide studies — there is a consensus among the relevant specialists that Israel is committing genocide.
And no crime has been so confessed to by its perpetrators as it happened. Israel announced a total blockade on all humanitarian aid entering Gaza 17 days ago, an incontrovertible contravention of international law. Last week, Israel’s minister of environmental protection declared the “only solution for the Gaza Strip is to empty it of Gazans,” one of countless statements of criminal and genocidal intent made by Israeli leaders and officials in the past 17 months. Israel has made no attempt to disguise its belief that the civilian population has collective guilt — “human beasts” who deserve only “damage” and “hell,” as one Israeli general said at the start — or its intent to raze Gaza to the ground. Israeli soldiers have joyously posted their crimes online, whooping, cheering and singing as they detonated civilians’ homes and abused detainees.
How can an obscenity so documented, evidenced and confessed to — an obscenity facilitated by Western weapons and diplomatic support — persist for so long? No one in Western politics or media circles can plausibly say: “I did not know what was really happening.”
In a rational world, cheerleaders of that abomination would be regarded as monsters with no place in public life. You cannot, after all, justify the Rwandan genocide and expect anything other than to become a pariah. However, it is those who opposed Israel’s depravity who have been deplatformed, shut down, censored, sacked, arrested and — in the case of the Columbia University graduate Mahmoud Khalil — detained and potentially deported.
By turning the world on its head, the most brazen and systematic attack on free speech in the West since McCarthyism has achieved its primary goal: widespread silence over a crime of historic proportions among those with power and influence. There are politicians who have unequivocally called the crime what it is, but they are marginalized and disciplined. There are mainstream journalists who speak the truth, but they are few. There are celebrities who use their platform to tell the truth — such as Gary Lineker, Paloma Faith, Khalid Abdala and Juliet Stevenson — but they are isolated.
The silent are scared about their careers and incomes, and not irrationally so. However, Gaza’s survivors are scared about starvation, disease, being burned alive and suffocated under rubble. Silence in the face of injustice is always a sin; when your government is facilitating genocide, it is a moral crime. In every atrocity in history, the silent are always principal players.
If all those who know a terrible evil is being committed spoke out, what would now happen? Ministers would resign from governments. Newspapers and news bulletins would not only lead with Israel’s atrocities, they would correctly frame them as heinous crimes, underpinned with a drumbeat — that something drastic must be done to stop them. Demands for an arms embargo and sanctions on Israel would become impossible to ignore. Rather than those who opposed genocide being hounded and vilified, it would be those complicit in genocide who would be emptied from public life.
Many of the silent undoubtedly feel guilt, and they should. Through their cowardice, they have played a pivotal role in normalizing some of the worst barbarism of the 21st century. Ending silence does not involve handwringing and platitudes about how sad you are about civilians dying: It means calling a crime for what it is and demanding accountability for those who facilitated it. Time is running out for the traumatized, maimed, starving people of Gaza. So is time for those who want to salvage their conscience.
Owen Jones is a The Guardian columnist.
The gutting of Voice of America (VOA) and Radio Free Asia (RFA) by US President Donald Trump’s administration poses a serious threat to the global voice of freedom, particularly for those living under authoritarian regimes such as China. The US — hailed as the model of liberal democracy — has the moral responsibility to uphold the values it champions. In undermining these institutions, the US risks diminishing its “soft power,” a pivotal pillar of its global influence. VOA Tibetan and RFA Tibetan played an enormous role in promoting the strong image of the US in and outside Tibet. On VOA Tibetan,
Sung Chien-liang (宋建樑), the leader of the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) efforts to recall Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Lee Kun-cheng (李坤城), caused a national outrage and drew diplomatic condemnation on Tuesday after he arrived at the New Taipei City District Prosecutors’ Office dressed in a Nazi uniform. Sung performed a Nazi salute and carried a copy of Adolf Hitler’s Mein Kampf as he arrived to be questioned over allegations of signature forgery in the recall petition. The KMT’s response to the incident has shown a striking lack of contrition and decency. Rather than apologizing and distancing itself from Sung’s actions,
US President Trump weighed into the state of America’s semiconductor manufacturing when he declared, “They [Taiwan] stole it from us. They took it from us, and I don’t blame them. I give them credit.” At a prior White House event President Trump hosted TSMC chairman C.C. Wei (魏哲家), head of the world’s largest and most advanced chip manufacturer, to announce a commitment to invest US$100 billion in America. The president then shifted his previously critical rhetoric on Taiwan and put off tariffs on its chips. Now we learn that the Trump Administration is conducting a “trade investigation” on semiconductors which
By now, most of Taiwan has heard Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an’s (蔣萬安) threats to initiate a vote of no confidence against the Cabinet. His rationale is that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP)-led government’s investigation into alleged signature forgery in the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) recall campaign constitutes “political persecution.” I sincerely hope he goes through with it. The opposition currently holds a majority in the Legislative Yuan, so the initiation of a no-confidence motion and its passage should be entirely within reach. If Chiang truly believes that the government is overreaching, abusing its power and targeting political opponents — then
RSS