Minister of Foreign Affairs Lin Chia-lung (林佳龍) and Minister of Culture Li Yuan (李遠) last month held a meeting in New Taipei City to discuss “cultural diplomacy,” with a particular focus on the Expo 2025 in Osaka, Japan, which is to be held next month.
Taiwan could not take part in this world-class festival under its own national name. Its international visibility is again compromised by political reality.
However, a project of building “Taiwan’s own pavilion” has been initiated by civil society, bringing light into darkness. The unofficial project was coordinated by civil groups including the Central Taiwan Association of University Professors.
The project’s plan is to build a pavilion with 2,300 wood pillars to represent the collective will of 23 million Taiwanese. The wood pillars are not only building materials, but would also deliver a political metaphor and a cultural expression to the world — despite being suppressed and marginalized, Taiwan would not be absent.
“Taiwan’s own pavilion” is not only a strategic cultural breakthrough, but also a civic action attempting to cover for the government’s limitations.
When the legislature slashed the budget for the “Yushan Pavilion,” limiting the government’s participation, civil groups raised funds, came up with creative designs, made plans and curated the project, demonstrating the resilience and creativity of Taiwanese society.
While their action is worth rounds of applause, it also calls for reflection. The opposition Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and Taiwan People’s Party slashed and froze the general budget proposed by the government, leaving citizens to fend for themselves, demonstrating the predicament faced by the government under the current balance of political powers.
The opposition lawmakers manifested their short-sightedness in policymaking by slashing budgets for Taiwan’s international participation.
This is a critical moment to integrate resources to showcase Taiwan’s achievements at a world-class festival, and yet we failed to do so. If the government continues to be absent, Taiwan would not be able to shine on the global stage.
What is more worrying is that this method of global participation is apparently unsustainable. Although the Ministry of Culture has plans to hold cultural activities in Japan, Taiwan could only rely on fundraising by civic groups, while other countries have pavilions present at the Expo in the name of their countries and have comprehensive strategies of cultural diplomacy.
“Taiwan’s own pavilion” carries a powerful implication — civil society can cover for the government in its absence.
However, in the long run, Taiwan’s international status cannot be consolidated only by civil society’s efforts and enthusiasm.
The government should address the problem, promote cultural diplomacy, proactively seek international support, strengthen cooperation with allies and develop a long-term and stable international participation strategy.
We should not let civil society fight on its own. The government should not be allowed to use political reality as an excuse for its inaction.
Only when the government works together with the public can Taiwan truly step on the world stage to enhance its international visibility and garner support.
Edwin Yang is an associate professor at National Taiwan Normal University and chairman of the Central Taiwan Association of University Professors.
Translated by Fion Khan
From the Iran war and nuclear weapons to tariffs and artificial intelligence, the agenda for this week’s Beijing summit between US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) is packed. Xi would almost certainly bring up Taiwan, if only to demonstrate his inflexibility on the matter. However, no one needs to meet with Xi face-to-face to understand his stance. A visit to the National Museum of China in Beijing — in particular, the “Road to Rejuvenation” exhibition, which chronicles the rise and rule of the Chinese Communist Party — might be even more revealing. Xi took the members
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) on Friday used their legislative majority to push their version of a special defense budget bill to fund the purchase of US military equipment, with the combined spending capped at NT$780 billion (US$24.78 billion). The bill, which fell short of the Executive Yuan’s NT$1.25 trillion request, was passed by a 59-0 margin with 48 abstentions in the 113-seat legislature. KMT Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文), who reportedly met with TPP Chairman Huang Kuo-chang (黃國昌) for a private meeting before holding a joint post-vote news conference, was said to have mobilized her
Before the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and its People’s Liberation Army (PLA) can blockade, invade, and destroy the democracy on Taiwan, the CCP seeks to make the world an accomplice to Taiwan’s subjugation by harassing any government that confers any degree of marginal recognition, or defies the CCP’s “One China Principle” diktat that there is no free nation of Taiwan. For United States President Donald Trump’s upcoming May 14, 2026 visit to China, the CCP’s top wish has nothing to do with Trump’s ongoing dismantling of the CCP’s Axis of Evil. The CCP’s first demand is for Trump to cease US
As artificial intelligence (AI) becomes increasingly widespread in workplaces, some people stand to benefit from the technology while others face lower wages and fewer job opportunities. However, from a longer-term perspective, as AI is applied more extensively to business operations, the personnel issue is not just about changes in job opportunities, but also about a structural mismatch between skills and demand. This is precisely the most pressing issue in the current labor market. Tai Wei-chun (戴偉峻), director-general of the Institute of Artificial Intelligence Innovation at the Institute for Information Industry, said in a recent interview with the Chinese-language Liberty Times