Animal attacks recently occurred in Taipei City, where — in two separate incidents — the same pit bull terrier jumped out of a truck window and bit motorcyclists stopped at a red light. Both happened within a couple of weeks, subjecting the two attacked to physical and psychological trauma.
The Taipei City Animal Protection Office confiscated the pit bull from its owner and specialists are evaluating the dog to determine whether it is suitable for adoption. However, it is worth questioning whether investing substantial resources in rehabilitating a breed known for aggression and attacks on humans is a responsible or effective use of public funds.
The breeding and ownership of pit bulls have long been banned in the UK, Australia and France. Many EU countries have also implemented strict restrictions on them. In the US, dogs that attack people are typically seized and sent to shelters, where most are humanely euthanized, rather than committing extensive resources to behavioral correction.
That is because animal shelters have limited resources, and prioritize caring for dogs that are likely to get adopted over those with severe behavioral issues that are difficult to correct. After all, it is impossible for a shelter to provide the necessary behavioral training needed for every dog to meet adoption requirements.
So why give special treatment to that pit bull? Is it due to misguided public pressure disguised as animal protection, or an attempt by the authorities to shirk their responsibilities? Even under a “no-kill” policy, the government should consider long-term sheltering for dangerous animals, rather than readoption.
While animal protection is important, we must also prioritize the safety of humans. The spirit of the Animal Protection Act (動物保護法) should not be interpreted as offering unconditional protection of animals while disregarding the rights and interests of humans. In Taiwan, although pit bulls are classified as “designated pets” and are subject to management and breeding regulations, they remain legal to own. In contrast, many countries completely ban pit bull ownership and breeding, citing public safety risks and the breed’s potential for unpredictable aggression.
A dog’s behavior is often a reflection of its owner’s actions and responsibilities. However, when an animal exhibits aggressive or dangerous behavior, we should seriously consider whether its welfare should be placed above the overall safety of the public.
Johnson Chiang is a former president of the World Veterinary Association.
Translated by Kyra Gustavsen
The gutting of Voice of America (VOA) and Radio Free Asia (RFA) by US President Donald Trump’s administration poses a serious threat to the global voice of freedom, particularly for those living under authoritarian regimes such as China. The US — hailed as the model of liberal democracy — has the moral responsibility to uphold the values it champions. In undermining these institutions, the US risks diminishing its “soft power,” a pivotal pillar of its global influence. VOA Tibetan and RFA Tibetan played an enormous role in promoting the strong image of the US in and outside Tibet. On VOA Tibetan,
There is much evidence that the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) is sending soldiers from the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) to support Russia’s invasion of Ukraine — and is learning lessons for a future war against Taiwan. Until now, the CCP has claimed that they have not sent PLA personnel to support Russian aggression. On 18 April, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelinskiy announced that the CCP is supplying war supplies such as gunpowder, artillery, and weapons subcomponents to Russia. When Zelinskiy announced on 9 April that the Ukrainian Army had captured two Chinese nationals fighting with Russians on the front line with details
On a quiet lane in Taipei’s central Daan District (大安), an otherwise unremarkable high-rise is marked by a police guard and a tawdry A4 printout from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs indicating an “embassy area.” Keen observers would see the emblem of the Holy See, one of Taiwan’s 12 so-called “diplomatic allies.” Unlike Taipei’s other embassies and quasi-consulates, no national flag flies there, nor is there a plaque indicating what country’s embassy this is. Visitors hoping to sign a condolence book for the late Pope Francis would instead have to visit the Italian Trade Office, adjacent to Taipei 101. The death of
By now, most of Taiwan has heard Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an’s (蔣萬安) threats to initiate a vote of no confidence against the Cabinet. His rationale is that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP)-led government’s investigation into alleged signature forgery in the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) recall campaign constitutes “political persecution.” I sincerely hope he goes through with it. The opposition currently holds a majority in the Legislative Yuan, so the initiation of a no-confidence motion and its passage should be entirely within reach. If Chiang truly believes that the government is overreaching, abusing its power and targeting political opponents — then
RSS