Animal attacks recently occurred in Taipei City, where — in two separate incidents — the same pit bull terrier jumped out of a truck window and bit motorcyclists stopped at a red light. Both happened within a couple of weeks, subjecting the two attacked to physical and psychological trauma.
The Taipei City Animal Protection Office confiscated the pit bull from its owner and specialists are evaluating the dog to determine whether it is suitable for adoption. However, it is worth questioning whether investing substantial resources in rehabilitating a breed known for aggression and attacks on humans is a responsible or effective use of public funds.
The breeding and ownership of pit bulls have long been banned in the UK, Australia and France. Many EU countries have also implemented strict restrictions on them. In the US, dogs that attack people are typically seized and sent to shelters, where most are humanely euthanized, rather than committing extensive resources to behavioral correction.
That is because animal shelters have limited resources, and prioritize caring for dogs that are likely to get adopted over those with severe behavioral issues that are difficult to correct. After all, it is impossible for a shelter to provide the necessary behavioral training needed for every dog to meet adoption requirements.
So why give special treatment to that pit bull? Is it due to misguided public pressure disguised as animal protection, or an attempt by the authorities to shirk their responsibilities? Even under a “no-kill” policy, the government should consider long-term sheltering for dangerous animals, rather than readoption.
While animal protection is important, we must also prioritize the safety of humans. The spirit of the Animal Protection Act (動物保護法) should not be interpreted as offering unconditional protection of animals while disregarding the rights and interests of humans. In Taiwan, although pit bulls are classified as “designated pets” and are subject to management and breeding regulations, they remain legal to own. In contrast, many countries completely ban pit bull ownership and breeding, citing public safety risks and the breed’s potential for unpredictable aggression.
A dog’s behavior is often a reflection of its owner’s actions and responsibilities. However, when an animal exhibits aggressive or dangerous behavior, we should seriously consider whether its welfare should be placed above the overall safety of the public.
Johnson Chiang is a former president of the World Veterinary Association.
Translated by Kyra Gustavsen
When Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) sits down with US President Donald Trump in Beijing on Thursday next week, Xi is unlikely to demand a dramatic public betrayal of Taiwan. He does not need to. Beijing’s preferred victory is smaller, quieter and in some ways far more dangerous: a subtle shift in American wording that appears technical, but carries major strategic meaning. The ask is simple: replace the longstanding US formulation that Washington “does not support Taiwan independence” with a harder one — that Washington “opposes” Taiwan independence. One word changes; a deterrence structure built over decades begins to shift.
Recently, Taipei’s streets have been plagued by the bizarre sight of rats running rampant and the city government’s countermeasures have devolved into an anti-intellectual farce. The Taipei Parks and Street Lights Office has attempted to eradicate rats by filling their burrows with polyurethane foam, seeming to believe that rats could not simply dig another path out. Meanwhile, as the nation’s capital slowly deteriorates into a rat hive, the Taipei Department of Environmental Protection has proudly pointed to the increase in the number of poisoned rats reported in February and March as a sign of success. When confronted with public concerns over young
Taipei is facing a severe rat infestation, and the city government is reportedly considering large-scale use of rodenticides as its primary control measure. However, this move could trigger an ecological disaster, including mass deaths of birds of prey. In the past, black kites, relatives of eagles, took more than three decades to return to the skies above the Taipei Basin. Taiwan’s black kite population was nearly wiped out by the combined effects of habitat destruction, pesticides and rodenticides. By 1992, fewer than 200 black kites remained on the island. Fortunately, thanks to more than 30 years of collective effort to preserve their remaining
After Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) met Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) in Beijing, most headlines referred to her as the leader of the opposition in Taiwan. Is she really, though? Being the chairwoman of the KMT does not automatically translate into being the leader of the opposition in the sense that most foreign readers would understand it. “Leader of the opposition” is a very British term. It applies to the Westminster system of parliamentary democracy, and to some extent, to other democracies. If you look at the UK right now, Conservative Party head Kemi Badenoch is
RSS