Recalls must succeed
The amendments to the Public Officials Election and Recall Act (選舉罷免法) promulgated by President William Lai (賴清德) on Tuesday critically damage Taiwan’s democratic mechanisms.
By passing a requirement for petition organizers and signers to provide copies of their national ID cards — showing home addresses and other sensitive information — as well as increased penalties for legal infringements, the changes would raise the recall threshold requirements so much that it would be just about impossible for recall campaigns to succeed.
The amendments are not only a technical selection and modification of the letter of the law, but a blatant attempt to manipulate politics through potential intimidation and to weaken the public’s ability to check bad lawmakers.
The amendments only serve the political interests of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP).
If the recall process becomes cumbersome and involves increased personal risks, the opportunity for civic oversight would be drastically reduced, hollowing out a mechanism to hold legislators accountable. If the mass recall movement fails, no matter how awful a legislator’s actions, the public would be unable to effectively hold another recall, which would lead to the all-out regression of Taiwan’s democracy.
In light of the amendments, the public must absolutely succeed in the great recall movement. In doing so, the course the KMT and TPP have led Taiwan down could be altered, conveying a clear message to politicians that Taiwanese will not tolerate actions that betray their democracy and take the nation backward.
If the recall movement fails, the KMT and the TPP would become more emboldened. The next three years would be certain to include even more slashing away at democracy, accompanied by malicious legislation that infringes on hard-won civil and human rights.
If they survive the recalls, it would lead to greater manipulation and incompetence within Taiwan’s political system. The success or failure of democracy hinges on this battle.
Shih Li
Tainan
The international women’s soccer match between Taiwan and New Zealand at the Kaohsiung Nanzih Football Stadium, scheduled for Tuesday last week, was canceled at the last minute amid safety concerns over poor field conditions raised by the visiting team. The Football Ferns, as New Zealand’s women’s soccer team are known, had arrived in Taiwan one week earlier to prepare and soon raised their concerns. Efforts were made to improve the field, but the replacement patches of grass could not grow fast enough. The Football Ferns canceled the closed-door training match and then days later, the main event against Team Taiwan. The safety
There are moments in history when America has turned its back on its principles and withdrawn from past commitments in service of higher goals. For example, US-Soviet Cold War competition compelled America to make a range of deals with unsavory and undemocratic figures across Latin America and Africa in service of geostrategic aims. The United States overlooked mass atrocities against the Bengali population in modern-day Bangladesh in the early 1970s in service of its tilt toward Pakistan, a relationship the Nixon administration deemed critical to its larger aims in developing relations with China. Then, of course, America switched diplomatic recognition
The National Immigration Agency on Tuesday said it had notified some naturalized citizens from China that they still had to renounce their People’s Republic of China (PRC) citizenship. They must provide proof that they have canceled their household registration in China within three months of the receipt of the notice. If they do not, the agency said it would cancel their household registration in Taiwan. Chinese are required to give up their PRC citizenship and household registration to become Republic of China (ROC) nationals, Mainland Affairs Council Minister Chiu Chui-cheng (邱垂正) said. He was referring to Article 9-1 of the Act
Strategic thinker Carl von Clausewitz has said that “war is politics by other means,” while investment guru Warren Buffett has said that “tariffs are an act of war.” Both aphorisms apply to China, which has long been engaged in a multifront political, economic and informational war against the US and the rest of the West. Kinetically also, China has launched the early stages of actual global conflict with its threats and aggressive moves against Taiwan, the Philippines and Japan, and its support for North Korea’s reckless actions against South Korea that could reignite the Korean War. Former US presidents Barack Obama
RSS