Later this week, White House envoys plan to discuss with their European counterparts how to end the nearly three-year war in Ukraine. However, for any negotiations to produce a durable settlement, the US and its allies must show they are willing to enforce it.
To date, Russian President Vladimir Putin has shown no serious interest in peacemaking. Russia controls about one-fifth of Ukraine and believes it holds the upper hand on the battlefield. Putin set out to subjugate the whole country; walking away with parts of four war-ravaged regions after taking more than 600,000 casualties would hardly be a triumph. He has repeatedly denied Ukraine’s sovereignty and set preconditions for talks — including forcing Ukraine to effectively disarm and abandon its NATO ambitions — designed to make it easier to restart the fighting.
The Kremlin is unlikely to negotiate more seriously until the costs of war outweigh the costs of peace. That would almost certainly require more Western economic and military pressure — and a credible, long-term commitment to Ukraine’s security.
Ukrainian leaders, who are increasingly realistic about their prospects for regaining lost territory on the battlefield, must do their part. If Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy’s government wants to show it deserves continued Western backing, it would need to address troop shortages by expanding recruitment and lowering the draft age from 25. Tackling corruption is equally crucial. Despite significant progress in the past few years, transparency and governance issues continue to undermine support among allies. Possible EU membership and billions in reconstruction aid would depend on accountability.
Meanwhile, US President Donald Trump must be prepared to follow through on threats to impose “high levels of Taxes, Tariffs, and Sanctions” on Russia if Putin appears to be stalling. The previous White House introduced potentially devastating oil curbs on its way out the door, taking aim at exports that fund about one-third of Russia’s budget. The new administration ought to implement them strictly, including by threatening secondary sanctions on Indian and Chinese buyers purchasing Russian oil above the US$60 price cap.
The biggest challenge would be convincing Putin that the West is intent on backing up any agreement, so he cannot just rearm and renew his offensive in a few years. As Zelenskiy highlighted in an interview with Bloomberg News at Davos, there can be no realistic talks without ironclad Western security guarantees. He pressed for US troops on the ground.
In reality, the burden would fall to European peacekeepers, supported by US logistics, as well as intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance assets. As politically difficult as this would be, the countries most likely to take part — the UK, Poland, France and Germany among them — must begin solidifying their troop pledges, if only to convince Putin they are serious. Getting NATO sign-off for Poland’s air defenses to down Russian missiles over Ukraine if they are heading toward Polish territory would also demonstrate commitment. In the meantime, Ukrainian forces still need more and better weapons — and fewer restrictions on their use.
The EU ought to show willingness to accelerate Ukraine’s accession, both to bolster its democracy and attract investors for its reconstruction. Europe must also move much faster to strengthen its own defenses. Some mechanism for joint funding would be required to support vast increases in military spending. Fragmented procurement processes must be rationalized and the continent’s defense-industrial base strengthened.
No doubt Trump would love a quick win in Ukraine, similar to the Israel-Hamas ceasefire that came together just before his inauguration. However, a weak deal that leaves Putin poised to resume his war would risk another cycle of conflict and instability, fracture the West and reshape the geopolitical balance. Even Trump could not spin that as a victory.
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) has long been expansionist and contemptuous of international law. Under Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平), the CCP regime has become more despotic, coercive and punitive. As part of its strategy to annex Taiwan, Beijing has sought to erase the island democracy’s international identity by bribing countries to sever diplomatic ties with Taipei. One by one, China has peeled away Taiwan’s remaining diplomatic partners, leaving just 12 countries (mostly small developing states) and the Vatican recognizing Taiwan as a sovereign nation. Taiwan’s formal international space has shrunk dramatically. Yet even as Beijing has scored diplomatic successes, its overreach
After 37 US lawmakers wrote to express concern over legislators’ stalling of critical budgets, Legislative Speaker Han Kuo-yu (韓國瑜) pledged to make the Executive Yuan’s proposed NT$1.25 trillion (US$39.7 billion) special defense budget a top priority for legislative review. On Tuesday, it was finally listed on the legislator’s plenary agenda for Friday next week. The special defense budget was proposed by President William Lai’s (賴清德) administration in November last year to enhance the nation’s defense capabilities against external threats from China. However, the legislature, dominated by the opposition Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), repeatedly blocked its review. The
In her article in Foreign Affairs, “A Perfect Storm for Taiwan in 2026?,” Yun Sun (孫韻), director of the China program at the Stimson Center in Washington, said that the US has grown indifferent to Taiwan, contending that, since it has long been the fear of US intervention — and the Chinese People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) inability to prevail against US forces — that has deterred China from using force against Taiwan, this perceived indifference from the US could lead China to conclude that a window of opportunity for a Taiwan invasion has opened this year. Most notably, she observes that
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) said on Monday that it would be announcing its mayoral nominees for New Taipei City, Yilan County and Chiayi City on March 11, after which it would begin talks with the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) to field joint opposition candidates. The KMT would likely support Deputy Taipei Mayor Lee Shu-chuan (李四川) as its candidate for New Taipei City. The TPP is fielding its chairman, Huang Kuo-chang (黃國昌), for New Taipei City mayor, after Huang had officially announced his candidacy in December last year. Speaking in a radio program, Huang was asked whether he would join Lee’s
RSS