After the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) in alliance with the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) imposed drastic budget cuts to bully the public, KMT Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) announced they also have plans to amend Article 23 of the Basic Environment Act (環境基本法), changing the goal of a “non-nuclear homeland” to a “carbon-free homeland.”
To develop nuclear energy, they also plan to amend Article 6 of the Nuclear Reactor Facilities Regulation Act (核子反應器設施管制法) by extending the operational lifespan of nuclear reactor facilities from 40 years to 60 years.
Taiwanese are already familiar with the goals of net zero emissions and low-carbon sustainability, but who knew that a so-called “carbon-free homeland” supposedly aligns with the global development trends of the 21st century? The reality is that most activities in everyday lives rely on carbon emissions. Is the KMT’s “carbon-free homeland” based on the expectation that everyone would just stop breathing? Such a lofty objective truly transcends the ordinary imagination.
The No. 2 reactor at the Ma-anshan (馬鞍山) Nuclear Power Plant in Pingtung County is to be decommissioned on May 17, as its operating license reaches the 40-year limit. That would mark the beginning of a new nuclear-free era for Taiwan.
The KMT — with its “carbon-free homeland” — seeks to prevent it. This move shows blatant disregard for the risks posed by aging nuclear reactors, nuclear safety concerns and the challenges that come with disposing of nuclear waste.
To put it bluntly, the KMT’s so-called “carbon-free homeland” is just a gimmick to cover up their true intentions to support and restore nuclear power.
Shieh Jyh-cherng is a retired National Taiwan University professor.
Translated by Kyra Gustavsen
There is much evidence that the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) is sending soldiers from the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) to support Russia’s invasion of Ukraine — and is learning lessons for a future war against Taiwan. Until now, the CCP has claimed that they have not sent PLA personnel to support Russian aggression. On 18 April, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelinskiy announced that the CCP is supplying war supplies such as gunpowder, artillery, and weapons subcomponents to Russia. When Zelinskiy announced on 9 April that the Ukrainian Army had captured two Chinese nationals fighting with Russians on the front line with details
On a quiet lane in Taipei’s central Daan District (大安), an otherwise unremarkable high-rise is marked by a police guard and a tawdry A4 printout from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs indicating an “embassy area.” Keen observers would see the emblem of the Holy See, one of Taiwan’s 12 so-called “diplomatic allies.” Unlike Taipei’s other embassies and quasi-consulates, no national flag flies there, nor is there a plaque indicating what country’s embassy this is. Visitors hoping to sign a condolence book for the late Pope Francis would instead have to visit the Italian Trade Office, adjacent to Taipei 101. The death of
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT), joined by the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), held a protest on Saturday on Ketagalan Boulevard in Taipei. They were essentially standing for the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), which is anxious about the mass recall campaign against KMT legislators. President William Lai (賴清德) said that if the opposition parties truly wanted to fight dictatorship, they should do so in Tiananmen Square — and at the very least, refrain from groveling to Chinese officials during their visits to China, alluding to meetings between KMT members and Chinese authorities. Now that China has been defined as a foreign hostile force,
On April 19, former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) gave a public speech, his first in about 17 years. During the address at the Ketagalan Institute in Taipei, Chen’s words were vague and his tone was sour. He said that democracy should not be used as an echo chamber for a single politician, that people must be tolerant of other views, that the president should not act as a dictator and that the judiciary should not get involved in politics. He then went on to say that others with different opinions should not be criticized as “XX fellow travelers,” in reference to
RSS