When scientists constructed a puzzle-solving task and pitted teams of people against teams of ants, the insects sometimes proved to be the smarter species. That is not to denigrate human intelligence — ants are smart, and their feats of coordinated activity are rare in nature.
Still, it is fair to say the results were humbling and that ants have something important to teach us. There is a lesson in why we sometimes fail to accomplish anything in staff meetings and why committees sometimes settle on a less effective solution to a problem than individual people could have provided.
The experiment used two versions of the same maze — one ant-sized and the other scaled to the size of a tennis court. Both species had to transport a T-shaped object — something bulky compared with their bodies — through a tricky series of openings. It was a bit like moving an awkwardly large couch through a narrow hallway or stairwell. The object had to be in just the right orientation to pass through the first opening and then rotate to pass through the second.
Illustration: Yusha
In videos that recently went viral, the ants — called longhorn crazy ants (Paratrechina longicornis) — danced through the exercise with such grace that even ant experts were amazed. The groups of humans appeared to bumble clumsily through the task. Some teams of ants solved the puzzle faster than some teams of humans.
Individual humans still always beat individual ants, said Ofer Feinerman, one of the authors of the research, which was published last month in the journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, but their performance vastly improved when they teamed up. Humans’ performance did not.
Yet humans have accomplished incredible feats of cooperation — we landed on the moon and built supercomputers and space telescopes as groups. Sometimes, we soar beyond what an individual could achieve, and sometimes, we get mired in groupthink. Good leadership can help, but it is not the whole answer.
Ants do not choose a leader, said Feinerman, a professor at the Weizmann Institute of Science in Israel.
Imagine you are helping move furniture, and you are in a position where you cannot see what is ahead. You would hold up your part and move with the group. That is what most of the ants do, he said.
However, a few would periodically detach from the group and get a better view of the walls of the puzzle. Then, since they have more knowledge, they nudge things in what they think is the right direction, he added.
The result is what Feinerman calls self-organization. The individual ants have no idea how the puzzle works, and intelligence emerges on the group level.
When allowed to communicate, human groups performed about as well as the average individual in the group, so there was no advantage to teaming up. He also tried making the humans perform under the same constraints the ants faced: They were instructed not to talk or even gesture to communicate. They did far worse.
The humans just wanted to reach a consensus — so much so that they gave up on pushing their individual ideas, and the consensus was almost always the most obvious solution, not the right one. That happens even if 80 percent of the people know the correct answer, he said. “They will not go with the majority and choose the correct thing. No, they will choose the bad and simple thing.”
Anna Dornhaus, a biologist who studies ant behavior at the University of Arizona, got an inside view of the experiment. Feinerman asked her to be one of his human subjects, and she agreed.
She said that when she and her teammates were not allowed to communicate, they had to decide whether to pull according to their hunches or follow others. She never knew if she was following along with the crowd or one particularly forceful individual. She knew the object would go nowhere if everyone tried to lead.
“A lot of it is about not being in paralysis because people disagree on what should be tried first,” she said. They eventually got through, but it took a couple of wrong tries.
In the real world, people have different ways of coordinating behavior. In a fast-moving restaurant kitchen, there is often exquisite orchestration, but it is fragile, dependent on a division of labor and subject to collapse if one person cannot perform, she said. (That is what makes the kitchen drama The Bear so suspenseful).
She said that ants function a little like the neurons in our brains.
They also self-organize rather than following leaders, and if neurons in one area get damaged, others pick up the slack. Individual worker ants, like most cells in our bodies, cannot reproduce on their own, so there is no evolutionary advantage to competing. People, on the other hand, always have conflicts of interest — natural selection programmed us to be selfish or altruistic, depending on the circumstances.
Crowds can be both wise and foolish, although the phenomenon known as the wisdom of the crowd only happens when large groups of people can think independently. Once they start to influence each other, they tend to ignore their wisdom in favor of consensus.
Feinerman said he does not necessarily think the groups of struggling humans were stupid. Nor were the individual ants. All animals are limited in different ways.
We humans are gifted with the ability to study other species and learn from them — so we can fly like birds and dive like whales.
Now, we might aspire to coordinate our business meetings and other group endeavors a little more like ants.
F.D. Flam is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist covering science. She is host of the Follow the Science podcast. This column does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the editorial board or Bloomberg LP and its owners.
The recent passing of Taiwanese actress Barbie Hsu (徐熙媛), known to many as “Big S,” due to influenza-induced pneumonia at just 48 years old is a devastating reminder that the flu is not just a seasonal nuisance — it is a serious and potentially fatal illness. Hsu, a beloved actress and cultural icon who shaped the memories of many growing up in Taiwan, should not have died from a preventable disease. Yet her death is part of a larger trend that Taiwan has ignored for too long — our collective underestimation of the flu and our low uptake of the
For Taipei, last year was a particularly dangerous period, with China stepping up coercive pressures on Taiwan amid signs of US President Joe Biden’s cognitive decline, which eventually led his Democratic Party to force him to abandon his re-election campaign. The political drift in the US bred uncertainty in Taiwan and elsewhere in the Indo-Pacific region about American strategic commitment and resolve. With America deeply involved in the wars in Ukraine and the Middle East, the last thing Washington wanted was a Taiwan Strait contingency, which is why Biden invested in personal diplomacy with China’s dictator Xi Jinping (習近平). The return of
The United States Agency for International Development (USAID) has long been a cornerstone of US foreign policy, advancing not only humanitarian aid but also the US’ strategic interests worldwide. The abrupt dismantling of USAID under US President Donald Trump ‘s administration represents a profound miscalculation with dire consequences for global influence, particularly in the Indo-Pacific. By withdrawing USAID’s presence, Washington is creating a vacuum that China is eager to fill, a shift that will directly weaken Taiwan’s international position while emboldening Beijing’s efforts to isolate Taipei. USAID has been a crucial player in countering China’s global expansion, particularly in regions where
Actress Barbie Hsu (徐熙媛), known affectionately as “Big S,” recently passed away from pneumonia caused by the flu. The Mandarin word for the flu — which translates to “epidemic cold” in English — is misleading. Although the flu tends to spread rapidly and shares similar symptoms with the common cold, its name easily leads people to underestimate its dangers and delay seeking medical treatment. The flu is an acute viral respiratory illness, and there are vaccines to prevent its spread and strengthen immunity. This being the case, the Mandarin word for “influenza” used in Taiwan should be renamed from the misleading