Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Legislator Chen Yu-jen (陳玉珍) on Wednesday last week proposed cutting the Ministry of Culture’s entire NT$2.309 billion (US$70.47 million) budget allocated to the Taiwan Public Television Service Foundation in a move heavily criticized by the film and arts sector.
Chen also commented on a Facebook post by Offshore Island Publishing editor-in-chief Ho Hsin-chieh (何欣潔), writing that the media need to “throw out that begging bowl.”
However, before Chen starts casting aspersions at others, she should remember that her own constituency, Kinmen County, has its own cash cow, Kinmen Kaoliang Liquor. Every year, it receives a central government subsidy of up to NT$5 billion, while the local government-run newspaper, the Kinmen Daily News, lambasts the central government in its editorials.
Based on Chen’s logic, perhaps Kinmen should stand on its own two feet and stop going to the central government with its begging bowl held aloft.
Last year, Control Yuan member Ma Hsiu-ju (馬秀如) raised concerns that Kinmen Kaoliang Liquor had donated surplus profit to the Kinmen County Government before making its tax declaration, and reported the company for enriching local government coffers at the expense of the state. Ma asked the local government to address the issue. One Kinmen county councilor said that they could not rule out mobilizing local residents to “go by” Ma’s residence.
That kind of behavior reflects poorly on the nation as a whole.
Perhaps Chen should follow her own example and propose in the Legislative Yuan that Kinmen discard its own “begging bowl.” That would reassure everyone that the KMT is genuinely watching the purse strings, mitigate the negative impression of Kinmen that the county commissioner brought upon it by attempting to intimidate a member of the Control Yuan and show that Kinmen residents stand by their reputation of being independent.
John Yu is a civil servant.
Translated by Paul Cooper
The United States Agency for International Development (USAID) has long been a cornerstone of US foreign policy, advancing not only humanitarian aid but also the US’ strategic interests worldwide. The abrupt dismantling of USAID under US President Donald Trump ‘s administration represents a profound miscalculation with dire consequences for global influence, particularly in the Indo-Pacific. By withdrawing USAID’s presence, Washington is creating a vacuum that China is eager to fill, a shift that will directly weaken Taiwan’s international position while emboldening Beijing’s efforts to isolate Taipei. USAID has been a crucial player in countering China’s global expansion, particularly in regions where
With the manipulations of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), it is no surprise that this year’s budget plan would make government operations difficult. The KMT and the TPP passing malicious legislation in the past year has caused public ire to accumulate, with the pressure about to erupt like a volcano. Civic groups have successively backed recall petition drives and public consensus has reached a fever-pitch, with no let up during the long Lunar New Year holiday. The ire has even breached the mindsets of former staunch KMT and TPP supporters. Most Taiwanese have vowed to use
Despite the steady modernization of the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA), the international community is skeptical of its warfare capabilities. Late last month, US think tank RAND Corp published two reports revealing the PLA’s two greatest hurdles: personnel challenges and structural difficulties. The first RAND report, by Jennie W. Wenger, titled Factors Shaping the Future of China’s Military, analyzes the PLA’s obstacles with recruitment, stating that China has long been committed to attracting young talent from top universities to augment the PLA’s modernization needs. However, the plan has two major constraints: demographic changes and the adaptability of the PLA’s military culture.
As an American living in Taiwan, I have to confess how impressed I have been over the years by the Chinese Communist Party’s wholehearted embrace of high-speed rail and electric vehicles, and this at a time when my own democratic country has chosen a leader openly committed to doing everything in his power to put obstacles in the way of sustainable energy across the board — and democracy to boot. It really does make me wonder: “Are those of us right who hold that democracy is the right way to go?” Has Taiwan made the wrong choice? Many in China obviously