Last year’s Romanian presidential election saw the rise of Calin Georgescu, an “independent” candidate who made it into the second round. His unexpected advance to the runoff election, where he was set to face pro-EU and pro-NATO Elena Lasconi, raised concerns among observers due to Georgescu’s favorable stance toward Russia.
As someone who was expected to receive minimal support in the first round, Georgescu ran on a political platform boosted by an enormous number of messages on social media, notably on TikTok, supporting his bid for the presidency.
Romanian officials said TikTok failed to label posts supporting Georgescu as “politically motivated.” That laid the foundation for the populist candidate’s rise. On the other hand, his rivals’ contents were properly labeled as “politically oriented.”
For the first time in the country’s democratic history, the Romanian Constitutional Court decided to annul the runoff election when it was due to take place in about two days.
The decision came after Romanian President Klaus Iohannis declassified several intelligence documents about Georgescu’s campaign investigation. It indicated that a large part of pro-Georgescu TikTok accounts’ contents were coordinated through a Telegram channel.
The investigation also revealed that many Romanian influencers have allegedly been paid to support Georgescu’s bid. The pro-Russia candidate denied having any campaign expenses, despite Romanian law requiring that electoral campaign expenditures be declared.
One of those influencers, Bogdan Peschir, is under investigation for allegedly donating US$1 million to an account promoting Georgescu.
Moreover, one of the intelligence files revealed what the Romanian Supreme Council of National Defense denounced as the “massive exposure” of Georgescu “based on preferential treatment by TikTok.”
In essence, the social media platform allegedly contravened its own policies on elections, particularly in regards to the prohibition of “paid promotions” and “political advertising” to “avoid interfering with voters.”
That is the reason Romanian officials and the EU Commission asked TikTok to clarify which measures it was adopting to “avoid the manipulation of information” and “mitigate the risks related to elections and pluralism of media.”
The Romanian case clearly exemplifies what most European politicians and citizens are failing to understand: TikTok’s outsized power to amplify specific voices, at the expense of others, poses a grave threat to democracy.
Although the social media platform defends itself by stating that it is “not owned or controlled by Beijing, since it is a private company,” the fact that it is an app made by Chinese in China should not be overlooked.
TikTok is extremely vulnerable to Chinese Communist Party demands, as Beijing is known for using private companies serve its goals. Those can be achieved through capturing data, surveilling users, and spreading false and misleading claims with the potential to undermine democracy and national security.
With regard to goals and interests, the past two years further demonstrated the convergence between China and Russia in the geopolitical arena, especially in the context of Beijing providing Moscow with dual-use components which are identified by the US and the EU as “high priority” items necessary for Russia’s war machine.
As China and Russia further intensify their common agenda aimed at destabilizing Western societies through “interference activities,” the EU should engage with Taiwan to tackle Russia’s hybrid threat tactics by learning from its experience in dealing with China’s “digital warfare.”
The two nations’ ambition to reorganize the global order through coordinated actions, which include cybersecurity threats, information manipulation and interference activities, must be met with a firmer stance by European countries.
Romania’s case could prove beneficial in understanding what steps authoritarian countries plan to take.
As researchers Ejazul Haq Ateed and Merve Suna Ozel Ozcan said in their paper titled A New Face of China: Sharp Power Strategy and its Global Effects, China and Russia aim to expand global influence by “distracting and manipulating information, rectifying its image and undermining adversaries.”
As TikTok could be used for influence operations, EU countries must tackle the challenges it poses by joining forces with like-minded countries such as the US, Taiwan, Canada or Australia in providing a renewed framework to prevent risks to their democratic existence.
It would imply setting up policies aimed at avoiding situations such as the presidential elections in Romania, since “prevention is better than the cure.”
Michele Maresca is an analyst at the online international law journal Il Caffe Geopolitico and the think tank Geopol 21.
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (傅?萁) has caused havoc with his attempts to overturn the democratic and constitutional order in the legislature. If we look at this devolution from the context of a transition to democracy from authoritarianism in a culturally Chinese sense — that of zhonghua (中華) — then we are playing witness to a servile spirit from a millennia-old form of totalitarianism that is intent on damaging the nation’s hard-won democracy. This servile spirit is ingrained in Chinese culture. About a century ago, Chinese satirist and author Lu Xun (魯迅) saw through the servile nature of
In their New York Times bestseller How Democracies Die, Harvard political scientists Steven Levitsky and Daniel Ziblatt said that democracies today “may die at the hands not of generals but of elected leaders. Many government efforts to subvert democracy are ‘legal,’ in the sense that they are approved by the legislature or accepted by the courts. They may even be portrayed as efforts to improve democracy — making the judiciary more efficient, combating corruption, or cleaning up the electoral process.” Moreover, the two authors observe that those who denounce such legal threats to democracy are often “dismissed as exaggerating or
Monday was the 37th anniversary of former president Chiang Ching-kuo’s (蔣經國) death. Chiang — a son of former president Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石), who had implemented party-state rule and martial law in Taiwan — has a complicated legacy. Whether one looks at his time in power in a positive or negative light depends very much on who they are, and what their relationship with the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) is. Although toward the end of his life Chiang Ching-kuo lifted martial law and steered Taiwan onto the path of democratization, these changes were forced upon him by internal and external pressures,
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus in the Legislative Yuan has made an internal decision to freeze NT$1.8 billion (US$54.7 million) of the indigenous submarine project’s NT$2 billion budget. This means that up to 90 percent of the budget cannot be utilized. It would only be accessible if the legislature agrees to lift the freeze sometime in the future. However, for Taiwan to construct its own submarines, it must rely on foreign support for several key pieces of equipment and technology. These foreign supporters would also be forced to endure significant pressure, infiltration and influence from Beijing. In other words,
RSS