President William Lai’s (賴清德) New Year’s Day speech covered much of the ground one would expect on such occasions. However, it was his comments on what is happening in the Legislative Yuan that were particularly more informative than his two previous major speeches, because of how specific he was.
He was clearly frustrated by the inability of the ruling Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) to get his administration’s agenda implemented and by the opposition’s attempts to jeopardize the nation’s constitutional order. He was not impressed either with DPP caucus leader Ker Chien-ming’s (柯建銘) recent comments on how to solve the impasse.
Lai has addressed the nation on three major occasions as president: his inaugural address on May 20 last year, his Double Ten National Day address on Oct. 10 last year and his speech on Wednesday last week.
During the inaugural address, coordination and cooperation between the executive and legislative branches were his first point. He said that the lack of an absolute majority for the governing party means the ruling and opposition parties are able to share their ideas, but that Taiwanese “have high expectations for rational governance among political parties.” He said that he had “high hopes” for “coordination between the executive and legislative branches.”
In the National Day speech, Lai was more focused on cross-strait issues, and even though the legislative chaos had already been going on for half a year, he kept his comments on the legislature brief, thanking Legislative Speaker Han Kuo-yu (韓國瑜) and Premier Cho Jung-tai (卓榮泰) for pursuing cooperation among the ruling and opposition parties, and saying that national interests should take precedence over the interests of political parties.
Lai’s Jan. 1 address had a change in tone. Gone were the wishful platitudes about political parties working together for the good of the nation; instead he insisted on keeping “firm on the path of democracy” that had enabled Taiwan to make it through the “dark age of authoritarianism” and that “domestic political disputes must be resolved democratically, within the constitutional system.”
He spoke of how the Executive Yuan has the right to request a reconsideration of the controversial bills passed in the Legislative Yuan, and that Constitutional Court adjudication would ensure a separation of powers, safeguard constitutional order and consolidate the constitutional system. He also said Taiwanese have the right of recall and that the central government needed access to adequate financial resources.
Those were all direct references to bills forced through the legislature by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and Taiwan People’s Party (TPP).
There is no doubt that Lai’s “high hopes” for reasonable coordination between the legislative and executive branches have been dashed and Taiwanese’s “high expectations for rational governance among political parties” have not been met.
Lai was specific about the opposition’s attempts to hobble the Constitutional Court and threaten constitutional order, his concerns about amendments to the Act Governing the Allocation of Government Revenues and Expenditures (財政收支劃分法) and the need for a robust recall mechanism, which the KMT and TPP have weakened.
Lai is clearly frustrated by what is happening, and the DPP caucus’ call for Han and Deputy Legislative Speaker Johnny Chiang (江啟臣), both from the KMT, to step down is a mark of that frustration.
However, Ker’s “nuclear option” solution to dealing with the ruling party’s travails in the legislature — recalling all 41 of the KMT legislators — is not only absurd, but also deeply undemocratic. It does not have the backing of his colleagues, and would not be what Lai means when he talks of hopes for the parties working together in a rational way for the good of the nation.
In the first year of his second term, US President Donald Trump continued to shake the foundations of the liberal international order to realize his “America first” policy. However, amid an atmosphere of uncertainty and unpredictability, the Trump administration brought some clarity to its policy toward Taiwan. As expected, bilateral trade emerged as a major priority for the new Trump administration. To secure a favorable trade deal with Taiwan, it adopted a two-pronged strategy: First, Trump accused Taiwan of “stealing” chip business from the US, indicating that if Taipei did not address Washington’s concerns in this strategic sector, it could revisit its Taiwan
The stocks of rare earth companies soared on Monday following news that the Trump administration had taken a 10 percent stake in Oklahoma mining and magnet company USA Rare Earth Inc. Such is the visible benefit enjoyed by the growing number of firms that count Uncle Sam as a shareholder. Yet recent events surrounding perhaps what is the most well-known state-picked champion, Intel Corp, exposed a major unseen cost of the federal government’s unprecedented intervention in private business: the distortion of capital markets that have underpinned US growth and innovation since its founding. Prior to Intel’s Jan. 22 call with analysts
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) challenges and ignores the international rules-based order by violating Taiwanese airspace using a high-flying drone: This incident is a multi-layered challenge, including a lawfare challenge against the First Island Chain, the US, and the world. The People’s Liberation Army (PLA) defines lawfare as “controlling the enemy through the law or using the law to constrain the enemy.” Chen Yu-cheng (陳育正), an associate professor at the Graduate Institute of China Military Affairs Studies, at Taiwan’s Fu Hsing Kang College (National Defense University), argues the PLA uses lawfare to create a precedent and a new de facto legal
International debate on Taiwan is obsessed with “invasion countdowns,” framing the cross-strait crisis as a matter of military timetables and political opportunity. However, the seismic political tremors surrounding Central Military Commission (CMC) vice chairman Zhang Youxia (張又俠) suggested that Washington and Taipei are watching the wrong clock. Beijing is constrained not by a lack of capability, but by an acute fear of regime-threatening military failure. The reported sidelining of Zhang — a combat veteran in a largely unbloodied force and long-time loyalist of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) — followed a year of purges within the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA)
RSS