Investors in Chinese bonds head into next year betting there would be no miraculous recovery in the economy, putting them at odds with an equities market that has wagered on a revival in consumption.
Although China’s closed capital account diminishes the 33 trillion yuan (US$4.53 trillion) market’s worth as an economic forecaster, the signal from 10-year bond yields scraping record lows almost daily and long bonds falling below Japanese yields still shows a deep-set negativity about the outlook.
“The bonds are basically saying that, yes, there is a [stock market] rally out there, but we don’t buy this rally for the long term,” said Bhanu Baweja, chief strategist for UBS Investment Bank in London.
“Bonds are saying that this is not an earnings-based rally, this is not a reflation-based rally,” he said.
A benchmark 10-year yield down more than 80 basis points this year to a record low of 1.78 percent reflects a banking system overflowing with cash and a market broadly expecting slow growth and hardly any inflation.
Bond prices move inversely to yields and, because sovereign debt is regarded as a safe asset, they are affected by a combination of inflation expectations, interest rates, creditworthiness and appetite for risk in other asset classes.
Since September, as China has cut interest rates and made numerous promises to stabilize financial and property markets, boost economic growth and revive consumption, equity markets have rallied and pushed price-to-earnings ratios sharply higher.
Bonds have made an almost opposite move, particularly at the long end where 30-year yields have been driven below 2 percent. Thirty-year yields in Japan, an economy which has become a byword for deflation and slow growth, are 2.24 percent.
“I think the Chinese bond yields should be lower if they were to reflect the current economic situation in the country,” said Edmund Goh, investment director of fixed income at abrdn in Singapore.
“We think it’s difficult to see meaningful inflation given the property situation in China now and the government is determined not to create another property bubble,” he said.
In March, China’s government set a growth target of “around 5 percent” for this year, but the world’s second-biggest economy has struggled for momentum and grew just 4.6 percent in the third quarter.
Goldman Sachs sees growth slowing to 4.5 percent next year.
Part of the backdrop to the bond rally is a lack of alternatives. Chinese banks are bursting with more than 300 trillion yuan in deposits, and with loan growth in the doldrums, much of that ends up flowing to money markets and bonds — pushing down yields.
The yield on the popular Tianhong Yu’Ebao (天弘餘額寶) money fund, which is China’s largest with more than 600 million investors, hit a record low at 1.266 percent this week.
“Onshore lenders are facing the question of whether to give out loans to businesses, or to play it safe with risk-free Chinese government bonds,” said Clarissa Teng, fixed income allocation strategist at the chief investment office of UBS global wealth management in Hong Kong.
“Many are doing the latter, especially given that credit demand from households and corporates has been soft as well,” Teng said.
Risks to the bond market are some of the same factors supporting equities — that China unveils a large fiscal spending plan which requires extra borrowing and leads to higher inflation, both of which are negative for bonds.
China’s central bank has also sounded uncomfortable with the scale of the rally and has actively sold bonds to slow it down. Foreign investors, including BlackRock, have also been sellers in part to take some profits after the long rally.
Still, most investors say the path of least resistance is for the rally to continue with Li Kai (李凱), chief investment officer of Beijing Shengao Fund Management (深高基金管理), expecting a 10-year yield of 1.6 percent next year and others confident in their positions.
“We’re struggling to find much reason to be pessimistic about the sovereign bond market,” analysts at Shanghai-based Shoupu Asset Management (守樸資產管理) said in a letter to investors last month.
“The facts of economic fundamentals are out there, and without strong, targeted growth-stabilizing policies, there is little resistance to the decline in bond yields,” they said.
The first Donald Trump term was a boon for Taiwan. The administration regularized the arms sales process and enhanced bilateral ties. Taipei will not be so fortunate the second time around. Given recent events, Taiwan must proceed with the assumption that it cannot count on the United States to defend it — diplomatically or militarily — during the next four years. Early indications suggested otherwise. The nomination of Marco Rubio as US Secretary of State and the appointment of Mike Waltz as the national security advisor, both of whom have expressed full-throated support for Taiwan in the past, raised hopes that
Whether in terms of market commonality or resource similarity, South Korea’s Samsung Electronics Co is the biggest competitor of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC). The two companies have agreed to set up factories in the US and are also recipients of subsidies from the US CHIPS and Science Act, which was signed into law by former US president Joe Biden. However, changes in the market competitiveness of the two companies clearly reveal the context behind TSMC’s investments in the US. As US semiconductor giant Intel Corp has faced continuous delays developing its advanced processes, the world’s two major wafer foundries, TSMC and
Authorities last week revoked the residency permit of a Chinese social media influencer surnamed Liu (劉), better known by her online channel name Yaya in Taiwan (亞亞在台灣), who has more than 440,000 followers online and is living in Taiwan with a marriage-based residency permit, for her “reunification by force” comments. She was asked to leave the country in 10 days. The National Immigration Agency (NIA) on Tuesday last week announced the decision, citing the influencer’s several controversial public comments, including saying that “China does not need any other reason to reunify Taiwan with force” and “why is it [China] hesitant
We are witnessing a sea change in the government’s approach to China, from one of reasonable, low-key reluctance at rocking the boat to a collapse of pretense over and patience in Beijing’s willful intransigence. Finally, we are seeing a more common sense approach in the face of active shows of hostility from a foreign power. According to Article 2 of the 2020 Anti-Infiltration Act (反滲透法), a “foreign hostile force” is defined as “countries, political entities or groups that are at war with or are engaged in a military standoff with the Republic of China [ROC]. The same stipulation applies to
RSS