US foreign policy analysts have accused Taiwan of not doing enough to deter China, citing insufficient defense spending and policy incoherence, but these criticisms rarely translate into meaningful action, while US officials talk big and engage in provocative and symbolic actions.
Affirming ties with Taiwan is fine, but talk is cheap, and with ongoing conflicts elsewhere drawing attention away from East Asia, the region is left without leadership in the face of increasing Chinese aggression. So how might US president-elect Donald Trump turn things around for Taiwan? Trump’s NATO policy serves as a good example.
Prior to Trump’s first presidential term, most NATO members did not meet the alliance’s defense spending guidelines, while the US carried the bulk of the burden. Nobody in Washington was willing to pressure US allies, so there was no political will in Europe to step up.
Trump’s antagonistic rhetoric generated that will, and by the time he left office in 2021, NATO member states’ defense spending had risen considerably.
Unfortunately, this was not enough. Europe’s resistance to increased defense spending sent a message of unseriousness to Russia. Had Trump secured a second term in 2020, continued efforts at burden sharing might have deterred Russia from invading Ukraine.
The idea that the US would always be there to protect Taiwan has turned China’s threat into an abstract one, placing it in a much further time horizon in the minds of Taiwanese and the leadership. Thus, there has been little political will to enact meaningful changes.
However, this is not to say that nothing has been done. Taiwan has increased the length of conscription from four months to one year, but critics have said that this means very little when the conscripts are poorly trained and undisciplined.
Taiwan has also bolstered its indigenous arms industry, rolling out its first domestically produced submarine prototype, the Hai Kun (海鯤), this year. The Hai Kun is undergoing sea trials and is expected to be delivered next year, with a seven more submarines to be built from next year to 2038 if the submarine budget is approved by legislators.
However, while these efforts are laudable, they are insufficient, and until there are incentives to act, Taiwan would continue to do the bare minimum.
Just as Trump pressured NATO members to play a bigger role in their defense, he would likewise pressure Taiwan, and if Taiwanese leadership is wise, they would use this as an opportunity to act.
US President Joe Biden’s administration over-promised and under-delivered for Taiwan.
The Biden administration’s failure to deter wars, such as in Europe and the Middle East, and the US’ response have also placed the US and its allies in an unprecedented position of weakness by pushing Russia, China and Iran closer together. It defied the foundational principle of US foreign policy since before World War II of preventing the rise of a Eurasian hegemon.
Trump recognizes the crucial role that Russia can play in the US’ strategy to contain China. His peace plans in Ukraine and the Middle East stand to, at the very least, prevent further anti-Western balancing in Eurasia, forcing Beijing to divert its attention away from the Taiwan Strait, and enabling the US and its allies to fortify their positions.
Trump would subject Taiwan to a rapid defense conditioning program, which might be difficult over the short term, but would pay dividends in the long run.
When the stakes of inaction are as high as they are right now, Trump is exactly what Taiwan needs to generate the political will to act.
Jack Burns is a graduate student at National Chengchi University.
In the event of a war with China, Taiwan has some surprisingly tough defenses that could make it as difficult to tackle as a porcupine: A shoreline dotted with swamps, rocks and concrete barriers; conscription for all adult men; highways and airports that are built to double as hardened combat facilities. This porcupine has a soft underbelly, though, and the war in Iran is exposing it: energy. About 39,000 ships dock at Taiwan’s ports each year, more than the 30,000 that transit the Strait of Hormuz. About one-fifth of their inbound tonnage is coal, oil, refined fuels and liquefied natural gas (LNG),
To counter the CCP’s escalating threats, Taiwan must build a national consensus and demonstrate the capability and the will to fight. The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) often leans on a seductive mantra to soften its threats, such as “Chinese do not kill Chinese.” The slogan is designed to frame territorial conquest (annexation) as a domestic family matter. A look at the historical ledger reveals a different truth. For the CCP, being labeled “family” has never been a guarantee of safety; it has been the primary prerequisite for state-sanctioned slaughter. From the forced starvation of 150,000 civilians at the Siege of Changchun
The two major opposition parties, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), jointly announced on Tuesday last week that former TPP lawmaker Chang Chi-kai (張啟楷) would be their joint candidate for Chiayi mayor, following polling conducted earlier this month. It is the first case of blue-white (KMT-TPP) cooperation in selecting a joint candidate under an agreement signed by their chairpersons last month. KMT and TPP supporters have blamed their 2024 presidential election loss on failing to decide on a joint candidate, which ended in a dramatic breakdown with participants pointing fingers, calling polls unfair, sobbing and walking
In the opening remarks of her meeting with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) in the Great Hall of the People in Beijing on Friday, Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) framed her visit as a historic occasion. In his own remarks, Xi had also emphasized the history of the relationship between the KMT and the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). Where they differed was that Cheng’s account, while flawed by its omissions, at least partially corresponded to reality. The meeting was certainly historic, albeit not in the way that Cheng and Xi were signaling, and not from the perspective
RSS