Are you ready for US president-elect Donald Trump unbound? You might have thought the former and future president was already pretty unrestrained, not least because Trump has never shown anything but brazen disrespect for boundaries or limits of any kind, and you would be right.
However, as an earlier entertainer turned president — and Trump combines the two roles — liked to say: “You ain’t seen nothing yet.”
That is because the 47th US president would enter the Oval Office free of almost all constraints.
Illustration: Yusha
He would be able to do all that he promised and all that he threatened, with almost nothing and no one to stand in his way.
To understand why, it pays to start with the nature of the win he secured on Tuesday. He did not eke out a narrow victory on points, as he did when he squeaked through the electoral college in 2016.
This was a knockout that has Trump on course to bag every one of the battleground states and to be the winner of the popular vote, the first Republican to pull off that feat in 20 years.
However, even that is to understate the transformational nature of this election. Trump won big and everywhere: gaining ground in 48 of the 50 states, in counties rural, urban and suburban, across almost every demographic, including groups such as Hispanic voters, who were once reliably Democratic.
“The 2024 election marks the biggest shift to the right in our country since Ronald Reagan’s victory in 1980,” said Doug Sosnik, a former political adviser in Bill Clinton’s White House.
What drove that red wave was the same anti-incumbency mood that has toppled governments all over the democratic world, including in the UK, and it is not too hard to explain.
Americans are still feeling the hangover of the inflation shock that followed the COVID-19 pandemic. Any conversation with a Trump voter, and I had many last week, would rapidly turn to high gas prices and unsustainable grocery bills.
In that climate, the impulse is to kick out the party in charge. Throw in fear of migrants and the accusation that Democrats are the party of the liberal coastal elites, in thrall to the progressive fringes and out of touch with ordinary people — both sentiments expertly inflamed by Trump — and you have the ingredients for a crushing defeat.
The result is that Trump would have control not only of the White House, but also the Senate and most likely the House of Representatives as well. Admittedly, Republicans had majorities on Capitol Hill when Trump took office eight years ago too, but here is the difference. Back then, there were at least a few moderate, Trump-skeptic Republicans in Congress ready to defy the president. Not now. Trump’s hold on what has become the Make America Great Again (MAGA) party is total.
There are next to no late US senator John McCains to give Trump the thumbs-down this time, certainly not enough to cause him trouble. What he wants, he would get.
This means he can nominate whoever he likes to all the key posts, knowing his yes-men in the Senate would give him the confirming nod. Last time, he felt pressure to appoint responsible Republicans to his Cabinet or to head federal agencies, officials who then went on to dilute or even thwart his wilder schemes.
This time he can surround himself with true believers, including the apostles of the notorious Project 2025 plan that Trump disavowed during the campaign, but which he is now free to implement — thereby ensuring a full-spectrum takeover by MAGA loyalists of the machinery of the US government.
It is no good looking to the US Supreme Court to act as a restraining hand. Thanks to Trump, that bench now has a six-to-three right-wing majority, and it has already issued the blank check he craved. In a July ruling, the court granted US presidents sweeping immunity for their official acts.
The threat of legal jeopardy that once hovered over Trump would melt away. To his delight, the multiple criminal cases against him are set to be suspended, on the principle that a sitting president cannot be indicted.
What, then, would be left to hold Trump in check? It would not be fear of losing the next election: He is constitutionally barred from running again (although you would not bet against him testing that limit too). The conventional media would do their best, but if the Trump era has shown us anything, it is that the information ecosystem of the US has changed utterly.
Fifty years ago, if three broadcast networks and a couple of east coast newspapers declared the president a crook, that president was finished, as former US president Richard Nixon learned to his cost. Now, the mainstream press can reveal the most damning evidence about Trump and it goes nowhere.
His supporters either never hear those revelations — because they get their news from Trump-friendly TV and social media channels — or, if they do, they flatly dismiss them as lies.
We truly live in the age of “alternative facts,” and that gives Trump enormous freedom. He could do heinous things in office, or simply fail as president, and tens of millions of Americans would never know about it.
The prospect of Trump unchecked is not merely an offense to abstract notions of democracy. It poses multiple dangers, all of them clear and present. To take just one, there is nothing to stop the old-new president making good on his promise to put the anti-vaccine fanatic and conspiracy theorist Robert F. Kennedy Jr in charge of public health. If that happens, there are already warnings that polio or measles could return to afflict American children.
Or consider the climate. Trump has promised to extract oil from the last pristine wilderness in North America, Alaska’s Arctic national wildlife refuge. US President Joe Biden had moved to preserve it; Trump would send in the rigs. That would accelerate yet further the climate breakdown, a crisis that was unmistakable that day in Salem, where the temperature reached a weird 26°C this month.
Trump is now free to abandon Ukraine to Russian President Vladimir Putin’s wolves, free to make NATO a dead letter — which it would be the day Trump is sworn in on Jan. 20. We know that Trump has contempt for NATO’s core principle of mutual defense. Without that, the alliance falls apart. Yet there is no one to stop him.
Ultimately that task would fall to the Democrats. Except they would soon wield no formal power in Washington. I asked one seasoned hand what practical tools the party had to restrain or even scrutinize Trump, given that they would soon lose their current ability to launch congressional investigations and convene official hearings. The answer: “They can hold press conferences.”
For now, Democrats are turned inward, engaged in a round of recriminations as competing factions blame each other for the loss. That process is inevitable, but the longer it goes on the more it helps Trump, by removing one more check on the power he would soon wield.
We know how Trump wants to rule because he has said so, telling a Fox News interviewer he would be a dictator “on day one.” We know which leaders he admires because of the way he gushes over Putin and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平). The assumption had always been that these fantasies of his would remain just that, because of the institutional checks and balances that fetter a US president.
However, when Trump renews his oath on Jan. 20, those restraints would look either badly frayed or entirely absent. He would be Trump unbound, free to do his worst.
Jonathan Freedland is a Guardian columnist.
Taiwan’s victory in the World Baseball Softball Confederation Premier12 championship is an historic achievement. Yet once again this achievement is marred by the indignity of the imposed moniker “Chinese Taipei.” The absurdity is compounded by the fact that none of the players are even from Taipei, and some, such as Paiwan catcher Giljegiljaw Kungkuan, are not even ethnically Chinese. The issue garnered attention around the Paris Olympics, yet fell off the agenda as Olympic memories retreated. “Chinese Taipei” persists, and the baseball championship serves as a reminder that fighting “Chinese Taipei” must be a continuous campaign, not merely resurfacing around international
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) appears to be encountering some culture shock and safety issues at its new fab in Arizona. On Nov. 7, Arizona state authorities cited TSMC for worker safety violations, fining the company US$16,131, after a man died in May. The Arizona Division of Occupational Safety and Health released its six-month investigation into the fatality and cited TSMC for failing to keep the workplace free from hazards likely to cause death or serious harm. At about the same time, the chip giant was also sued for alleged discriminatory hiring practices favoring Asians, prompting a flurry of debate on whether TSMC’s
This month, the National Health Insurance (NHI) is to implement a major policy change by eliminating the suspension-and-resumption mechanism for Taiwanese residing abroad. With more than 210,000 Taiwanese living overseas — many with greater financial means than those in Taiwan — this reform, catalyzed by a 2022 Constitutional Court ruling, underscores the importance of fairness, sustainability and shared responsibility in one of the world’s most admired public healthcare systems. Beyond legal obligations, expatriates have a compelling moral duty to contribute, recognizing their stake in a system that embodies the principle of health as a human right. The ruling declared the prior
US president-elect Donald Trump is inheriting from President Joe Biden a challenging situation for American policy in the Indo-Pacific region, with an expansionist China on the march and threatening to incorporate Taiwan, by force if necessary. US policy choices have become increasingly difficult, in part because Biden’s policy of engagement with China, including investing in personal diplomacy with President Xi Jinping (習近平), has not only yielded little but also allowed the Chinese military to gain a stronger footing in the South China Sea and the Taiwan Strait. In Xi’s Nov. 16 Lima meeting with a diminished Biden, the Chinese strongman signaled little
RSS