The foundation of the US began with the Revolutionary War against Britain — which took place from 1775 to 1783 — while the origin of its democratic development began in 1787 at the Constitutional Convention, held in Philadelphia. The convention, which began in May and concluded in September of that year, resulted in the drafting of the US constitution, which was submitted to the states for approval. The founding fathers of the US — including George Washington and Benjamin Franklin — all participated in the drafting.
When faced with national distress, citizens of many imperial, transitioning and emerging countries around the world often respond by emigrating to the US. Even worse, ruling families and wealthy elites of many autocratic and dictatorial regimes frequently take refuge in the US rather than actively working to improve the living conditions in their own countries — some even become accomplices to the oppressors. During Taiwan’s martial law period, privileged circles within the ruling party and the military were inundated with this kind of opportunistic behavior.
These people fail to earnestly work toward building the political conditions for democracy, yet crave the democratic conditions of other countries. Many countries around the world are trapped in similar situations, which reflects the cultural nature of democracy — the significance behind its form and observance.
The US’ three branches of government — executive, legislative and judicial — in addition to the interactive relationship between the federal and state governments shape the effective operation of its power structure. What makes the US the US is that — despite political conflict and the chaos caused by frequent changes in the US presidency and Congress that reflect the diversity of different groups and the conflicts of ideologies and interest — its democracy continues to develop and progress.
Taiwan, which still goes by the name Republic of China, faced the reality that its territorial scope, which was once the entirety of China, was replaced by the establishment of the People’s Republic of China in 1949. It became an incomplete state, made up of the surviving remnants of China left within its borders.
While martial law was lifted in 1987, the development of the road to democratization has been anything but smooth. A direct presidential election was held in 1996, marking Taiwan’s first significant step toward becoming a nation that exists for those living within it. However, an effort remains to break free from the situation of being a mere construct, a remnant, or an “other,” influenced or hindered by Chinese ideology.
Democratization has granted those living in Taiwan rights and responsibilities. Taiwan’s national dilemmas and the struggles of democratic development are issues that all Taiwanese with a democratic vision must face. Regardless of which candidate won the US presidential election this week, it is more pertinent for Taiwan that Taiwanese recognize the need to be self-reliant and pay closer attention to their own democratic development.
The development of democracy in the US has not been perfect, and yet it still attracts people from all over the world. Many from Taiwan and China run from their national responsibilities or leave to pursue the American dream.
Taiwan’s democratization must be cherished — only then can people living in Taiwan have the dignity of subjectivity. It cannot merely be about money. A country is the cultural imagination of community and a political structure — each citizen is the master of their own nation.
The development of Taiwan’s democracy is the right and responsibility of all Taiwanese citizens.
Lee Min-yung is a poet.
Translated by Kyra Gustavsen
Taiwan’s higher education system is facing an existential crisis. As the demographic drop-off continues to empty classrooms, universities across the island are locked in a desperate battle for survival, international student recruitment and crucial Ministry of Education funding. To win this battle, institutions have turned to what seems like an objective measure of quality: global university rankings. Unfortunately, this chase is a costly illusion, and taxpayers are footing the bill. In the past few years, the goalposts have shifted from pure research output to “sustainability” and “societal impact,” largely driven by commercial metrics such as the UK-based Times Higher Education (THE) Impact
History might remember 2026, not 2022, as the year artificial intelligence (AI) truly changed everything. ChatGPT’s launch was a product moment. What is happening now is an anthropological moment: AI is no longer merely answering questions. It is now taking initiative and learning from others to get things done, behaving less like software and more like a colleague. The economic consequence is the rise of the one-person company — a structure anticipated in the 2024 book The Choices Amid Great Changes, which I coauthored. The real target of AI is not labor. It is hierarchy. When AI sharply reduces the cost
The inter-Korean relationship, long defined by national division, offers the clearest mirror within East Asia for cross-strait relations. Yet even there, reunification language is breaking down. The South Korean government disclosed on Wednesday last week that North Korea’s constitutional revision in March had deleted references to reunification and added a territorial clause defining its border with South Korea. South Korea is also seriously debating whether national reunification with North Korea is still necessary. On April 27, South Korean President Lee Jae-myung marked the eighth anniversary of the Panmunjom Declaration, the 2018 inter-Korean agreement in which the two Koreas pledged to
I wrote this before US President Donald Trump embarked on his uneventful state visit to China on Thursday. So, I shall confine my observations to the joint US-Philippine military exercise of April 20 through May 8, known collectively as “Balikatan 2026.” This year’s Balikatan was notable for its “firsts.” First, it was conducted primarily with Taiwan in mind, not the Philippines or even the South China Sea. It also showed that in the Pacific, America’s alliance network is still robust. Allies are enthusiastic about America’s renewed leadership in the region. Nine decades ago, in 1936, America had neither military strength
RSS