On Oct. 17, the National Development Council released its latest population projections. The predictions, while expected, are not good.
The nation’s population is projected to continue to decline, moving Taiwan into a “super-aged” society next year.
In 1970, the population was 14.7 million, compared with more than 23 million today. By 2060, this figure is projected to fall to 17.4 million.
Population decline is a serious problem that has been long in the making and has long-term implications. These will arise even if the government can turn the ship around at this late juncture, which does not seem to be happening.
The nuances of the problem can be seen not in population figures or even the dependency ratio — expressed as the number of dependents per 100 people in the working population — but at the interplay of the child dependency ratio — referring to the non-working age group of 0-15 — and the old-age dependency ratio — the non-working age group of those aged 65 or older — because of the stresses they place on the system and the challenges solutions entail.
The overall dependency ratio was 74.2 in 1970. It is projected to be 46.3 next year and 102.2 in 2060.
That is, it has been declining, but is set to increase in the next few decades.
A distinction must be drawn between the two dependency ratios. In 1970, the child dependency ratio was 69.08, compared with 5.08 for old-age dependency, ie, there were proportionally more children and fewer elderly people.
The projection for 2060 reverses that: The child dependency ratio is to plummet to 14.94, while the old-age dependency ratio is to jump to 87.28.
These figures do not exist in isolation, neither is the population the salient point. Rather, they tell a story of massive and long-term social transformation that will need to be addressed.
The transformation will require services and institutions to find solutions to evolving needs as they provide an emphasis on childcare and schools, more resources for long-term and palliative care, implement radical changes in priorities in healthcare provision and hospital training, as well as ways to mitigate increased strain on the National Health Insurance system.
Yet another element is regional differences. Ministry of the Interior data on local demographics show differences in the proportion of the elderly people by region: The 65-or-older age group is greater than 20 percent in Taipei and Keelung, as well as Chiayi, Nantou, Yunlin, Pingtung and Hualien counties, making them officially “super-aged,” while the ratios in Hsinchu County, Hsinchu City, Lienchiang County and Taoyuan were only 14.25 percent, 15.06 percent, 15.4 percent and 15.48 percent respectively.
Historically, it seems that governments in Asia have had considerable more success in discouraging couples to have children than encouraging parenthood: China has ended its one-child policy, but Chinese couples have not responded to state efforts to encourage them to procreate. In post-World War II Japan, Tokyo promoted contraception and decriminalized abortion to curb population growth, but encouraging childbirth is a more challenging proposition. In the 1970s, South Korea legalized abortion, but is now struggling to address one of the lowest birthrates in the world.
Promoting childbirth is also an uphill struggle in Taiwan. The problem is that demographic changes are measured in decades, not years, and the nation is in the middle of a switch of the two dependency rates — nationally and regionally. The government must address the social challenges of this demographic transformation, not merely the fertility rate.
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) has long been expansionist and contemptuous of international law. Under Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平), the CCP regime has become more despotic, coercive and punitive. As part of its strategy to annex Taiwan, Beijing has sought to erase the island democracy’s international identity by bribing countries to sever diplomatic ties with Taipei. One by one, China has peeled away Taiwan’s remaining diplomatic partners, leaving just 12 countries (mostly small developing states) and the Vatican recognizing Taiwan as a sovereign nation. Taiwan’s formal international space has shrunk dramatically. Yet even as Beijing has scored diplomatic successes, its overreach
In her article in Foreign Affairs, “A Perfect Storm for Taiwan in 2026?,” Yun Sun (孫韻), director of the China program at the Stimson Center in Washington, said that the US has grown indifferent to Taiwan, contending that, since it has long been the fear of US intervention — and the Chinese People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) inability to prevail against US forces — that has deterred China from using force against Taiwan, this perceived indifference from the US could lead China to conclude that a window of opportunity for a Taiwan invasion has opened this year. Most notably, she observes that
For Taiwan, the ongoing US and Israeli strikes on Iranian targets are a warning signal: When a major power stretches the boundaries of self-defense, smaller states feel the tremors first. Taiwan’s security rests on two pillars: US deterrence and the credibility of international law. The first deters coercion from China. The second legitimizes Taiwan’s place in the international community. One is material. The other is moral. Both are indispensable. Under the UN Charter, force is lawful only in response to an armed attack or with UN Security Council authorization. Even pre-emptive self-defense — long debated — requires a demonstrably imminent
Since being re-elected, US President Donald Trump has consistently taken concrete action to counter China and to safeguard the interests of the US and other democratic nations. The attacks on Iran, the earlier capture of deposed of Venezuelan president Nicolas Maduro and efforts to remove Chinese influence from the Panama Canal all demonstrate that, as tensions with Beijing intensify, Washington has adopted a hardline stance aimed at weakening its power. Iran and Venezuela are important allies and major oil suppliers of China, and the US has effectively decapitated both. The US has continuously strengthened its military presence in the Philippines. Japanese Prime
RSS