The world is feeling the angst of liminality, as the US’ friends and foes await the outcome of the presidential election tomorrow. Would the superpower have former US president Donald Trump or US Vice President Kamala Harris as commander-in-chief? Until that question is answered, nothing much can move; nothing of note can be resolved. However, what if no answer is forthcoming, at least not for a while?
Picture decisionmakers around the world holding their collective breath right now. In the Middle East, which teeters on the edge of major regional war, envoys from Israel, Egypt, the US and Qatar are once again meeting in Doha about a ceasefire in the Gaza Strip. However, nobody would commit to anything until US voters decide who is to sit at the Resolute Desk come January.
In the Kremlin, Russian President Vladimir Putin is waiting for tomorrow’s result to decide his next steps in Ukraine and elsewhere. (He is rooting for Trump, but wary of that scenario, too.) In North Korea, Kim Jong-un is paying close attention to the vote as he brandishes his nukes at South Korea. From Beijing to Tehran, Minsk to Caracas, anti-US autocrats are on tenterhooks to find out who their new adversary would be.
Illustration: Yusha
The US’ allies are in limbo, too. Japan, which was already nervous about a second Trump turn, suddenly has its own government crisis, after an election that left no clear winner for the first time since the 1990s. Germany’s government, a year from the next parliamentary election, is a zombie coalition that might fall apart at any moment. Like all US allies, Tokyo and Berlin wonder if they would still have a friend in the White House next year, or instead a nationalist who slaps tariffs on their exports and threatens to abandon them to their enemies.
Then there are all the other countries, those which are neither allies nor adversaries of the US, but once looked to it, and only it, to provide some semblance of order in an anarchical world. That is true from the South Pacific to Africa, where nations are feeling pressure to decide between the US and China in mapping out future allegiances. The angst is especially acute in places such as Moldova and Georgia, which are swaying between a Russian-dominated East and the Euro-US West, and just had elections in which Moscow, as usual, ran massive disinformation campaigns.
The liminality extends to the multilateral system, as embodied in the UN and other institutions of international law. Already losing relevance in a world of war and disorder, the UN might not survive, at least not in any recognizable form, a second term by Trump, who dismisses the organization as a club of “globalists.” Its fate under Harris is almost as unclear.
Even if Trump wins, tomorrow might bring some relief, as long as it delivers a decision and indicates a clear direction. However, worse scenario cannot be ruled out. That is an absence of resolution, through a contested transfer of power that plays out over months, either in the courts or, heaven forbid, in the streets, with verbal or physical violence of the kind that the US used to criticize in other countries.
Neither the US nor the world has experience with such a horror script set in the US. The close election of 2000 (when George W. Bush defeated Al Gore, but only by a hair and after much lawyering) was a cliffhanger. However, it took place during a “unipolar” moment of geopolitics, when no other power dared to test US might and resolve during the transition.
The contentious handover of 2020 was more dangerous, but found resolution once the coup of Jan. 6, 2021, failed. World politics was already wobbly, but not yet careening: That happened more recently, after Putin invaded all of Ukraine, after Hamas massacred Israelis and Israel bombed Gaza and Lebanon, and as China ratcheted up its intimidation of Taiwan. Worse yet, Russia, China, North Korea and Iran began forming an anti-US “axis” in all but name, raising the specter of World War III.
A contested transition this year would be more perilous for another reason. Domestic polarization and foreign disinformation are old news. This year, Russia, China and Iran have plumbed new depths of malign sophistication in the propaganda and conspiracy theories they plant and spread to pit Americans against one another. Trump is likely to build on his “Big Lie” about the 2020 election with even bigger lies, and the trolls and bots of the US’ enemies, as well as “useful idiots” in the country itself, would amplify them.
Even if the US avoids violence this fall and winter, even if either Trump or Harris arrives uncontested in the Oval Office, even if the White House and Congress go to the same side: This larger “epistemic crisis” would keep the US divided and the world in the lurch. Just as Americans can no longer agree on who won an election, they are increasingly unable to stipulate who is the aggressor or victim in Ukraine, what principles and interests are worth the US’ trouble abroad, and what its proper role in the world should be.
Nature abhors a vacuum, Aristotle said. So does geopolitics. The world risks facing a vacuum in the coming months and years, no matter what the ballot count says next week — a vacuum not so much of power, as of truth, reason and ambition.
Andreas Kluth is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist covering US diplomacy, national security and geopolitics. Previously, he was editor-in-chief of Handelsblatt Global and a writer for The Economist.
On Monday, the day before Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) departed on her visit to China, the party released a promotional video titled “Only with peace can we ‘lie flat’” to highlight its desire to have peace across the Taiwan Strait. However, its use of the expression “lie flat” (tang ping, 躺平) drew sarcastic comments, with critics saying it sounded as if the party was “bowing down” to the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). Amid the controversy over the opposition parties blocking proposed defense budgets, Cheng departed for China after receiving an invitation from the CCP, with a meeting with
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) is leading a delegation to China through Sunday. She is expected to meet with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) in Beijing tomorrow. That date coincides with the anniversary of the signing of the Taiwan Relations Act (TRA), which marked a cornerstone of Taiwan-US relations. Staging their meeting on this date makes it clear that the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) intends to challenge the US and demonstrate its “authority” over Taiwan. Since the US severed official diplomatic relations with Taiwan in 1979, it has relied on the TRA as a legal basis for all
A delegation of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) officials led by Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) is to travel to China tomorrow for a six-day visit to Jiangsu, Shanghai and Beijing, which might end with a meeting between Cheng and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平). The trip was announced by Xinhua news agency on Monday last week, which cited China’s Taiwan Affairs Office (TAO) Director Song Tao (宋濤) as saying that Cheng has repeatedly expressed willingness to visit China, and that the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Central Committee and Xi have extended an invitation. Although some people have been speculating about a potential Xi-Cheng
The ongoing Iran conflict is putting Taiwan’s energy fragility on full display — the island of 23 million people, home to the world’s most advanced semiconductor manufacturing, is highly dependent on imported oil and gas, especially that from the Middle East. In 2025, 69.6 percent of Taiwan’s crude oil and 38.7 percent of liquified natural gas were sourced from the Middle East. In the same year, 62 percent of crude oil and 34 percent of LNG to Taiwan went through the Strait of Hormuz. Taiwan’s state-run oil company CPC Corp’s benchmark crude oil price (70 percent Dubai, 30 percent Brent)
RSS