Dangers of Chinese tech
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) keeps an ever-watchful eye over China’s population, arresting dissidents and those whose ideas stray too far from party ideals.
In Taiwan, too, Chinese technology — Xiaomi and Hikvision to name a few brands — is ubiquitous. Users download paired software and applications made in China to register their devices, with some even connecting to Internet servers based in China.
All such data passing through Chinese-made tech — every single move, spoken word and keystroke — could be transmitted to China at any time from anywhere. It could be saved in a data cloud in China and monitored, as has been proven multiple times overseas with the data harvesting by ByteDance.
With such grave national security problems, does the government have any policymaking body dealing with the issue?
How many Chinese-made surveillance cameras or monitoring equipment are being used in the neighborhoods or along the commuting routes of important government figures, high-ranking military officers, national security units and lawmakers?
We need to see this as an urgent national security issue. Even original equipment factories used by government procurers are using Chinese equipment either in secret or without knowing it.
How could we place limits or restrictions, even for the public’s use of various unchecked China-based online shopping platforms such as Taobao and Tmall? Are we just going to wait for disaster to strike before we do anything about it?
Since Taiwan’s market is small, backing for application software services is not easy.
The Ministry of Digital Affairs should act as the government’s overseer for this issue, putting out public bid tenders for a “national data security platform app” and stipulating that all people within Taiwan who use hardware made in China should transfer use records to this official application, while at the same time disabling China’s factory-set surveillance apps.
Through thoroughly cutting off login and registration for use of China’s surveillance apps, plucking out the all-seeing third eye of the CCP, we could get monitoring equipment and devices back under our own control and avoid data security risks from Chinese surveillance, guaranteeing the public’s democratic freedoms and security.
We could even export our own technology to provide this service to countries with similar needs, working together to safeguard the lines of defense of democracies everywhere.
Hsu Yu-min
Taipei
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) has long been expansionist and contemptuous of international law. Under Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平), the CCP regime has become more despotic, coercive and punitive. As part of its strategy to annex Taiwan, Beijing has sought to erase the island democracy’s international identity by bribing countries to sever diplomatic ties with Taipei. One by one, China has peeled away Taiwan’s remaining diplomatic partners, leaving just 12 countries (mostly small developing states) and the Vatican recognizing Taiwan as a sovereign nation. Taiwan’s formal international space has shrunk dramatically. Yet even as Beijing has scored diplomatic successes, its overreach
In her article in Foreign Affairs, “A Perfect Storm for Taiwan in 2026?,” Yun Sun (孫韻), director of the China program at the Stimson Center in Washington, said that the US has grown indifferent to Taiwan, contending that, since it has long been the fear of US intervention — and the Chinese People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) inability to prevail against US forces — that has deterred China from using force against Taiwan, this perceived indifference from the US could lead China to conclude that a window of opportunity for a Taiwan invasion has opened this year. Most notably, she observes that
For Taiwan, the ongoing US and Israeli strikes on Iranian targets are a warning signal: When a major power stretches the boundaries of self-defense, smaller states feel the tremors first. Taiwan’s security rests on two pillars: US deterrence and the credibility of international law. The first deters coercion from China. The second legitimizes Taiwan’s place in the international community. One is material. The other is moral. Both are indispensable. Under the UN Charter, force is lawful only in response to an armed attack or with UN Security Council authorization. Even pre-emptive self-defense — long debated — requires a demonstrably imminent
Since being re-elected, US President Donald Trump has consistently taken concrete action to counter China and to safeguard the interests of the US and other democratic nations. The attacks on Iran, the earlier capture of deposed of Venezuelan president Nicolas Maduro and efforts to remove Chinese influence from the Panama Canal all demonstrate that, as tensions with Beijing intensify, Washington has adopted a hardline stance aimed at weakening its power. Iran and Venezuela are important allies and major oil suppliers of China, and the US has effectively decapitated both. The US has continuously strengthened its military presence in the Philippines. Japanese Prime
RSS