Indonesian President Joko Widodo left office yesterday with high approval ratings thanks to strong economic growth, but his successor Prabowo Subianto has bigger ambitions, including an eye-catching US$28 billion free meal plan for students.
While the country regularly enjoys about five percent annual growth, the former general has pledged to capitalize on his predecessor’s policies to reach eight percent by tapping the nation’s huge human resources.
“From prosperity, we can bring justice to all Indonesian people. We must unite to eliminate poverty and eliminate hunger, and eliminate suffering from our people,” Prabowo said in his victory speech in March.
To do that, he is banking on big national projects, the archipelago’s vast natural resources and attempts to lower a poverty rate of more than nine percent.
He has pledged to largely carry on the popular economic program of Widodo, better known as Jokowi, and has also signaled a more direct attempt to alleviate poverty in the nation of about 280 million.
His big campaign pledge is a US$28 billion plan to supply tens of millions of schoolchildren and pregnant women nationwide with free meals.
He says the scheme — to be rolled out in January — would halt stunted growth in a country where more than one-fifth of children up to five years old are affected and create several million more jobs.
Yet the plan has faced criticism over logistical and cost issues, with some wondering how he could pull off the plan and keep spending within the annual fiscal deficit limit of three percent of GDP, which is mandated by law.
Jokowi focused on large infrastructure projects, including roads, bridges and airports, aimed at better connecting the archipelago.
However, experts say Prabowo would deviate from that in his bid to realize a campaign promise to turn Indonesia, a G20 member, into an “advanced and developed” economy.
“He won’t be blindly following Jokowi’s footsteps, but he also won’t completely abandon or neglect everything, so he will be somewhat in the middle,” the Centre for Strategic and International Studies economist Yose Rizal Damuri said. “It seems like he has a slightly different approach from Jokowi. The priority is no longer infrastructure development, but more to human capital development.”
His agenda would also focus on agriculture, with a food estate program aimed at achieving food self-sufficiency, land clearing for bioethanol projects in the restive eastern region of Papua and a green fund selling carbon emission credits, observers said.
At the same time, Prabowo is inheriting Jokowi’s legacy project — a US$32 billion move of the capital from traffic-clogged and sinking Jakarta to Nusantara, a planned green city in eastern Borneo, where construction is underway.
The city would not be ready until 2045, but its rapid construction is already eating into state coffers. Prabowo has pledged to continue the project despite speculation he would put it on hold or keep Jakarta as the capital.
He has also supported Jokowi’s resource nationalism, particularly in the nickel sector, where Jakarta has imposed export restrictions in a bid to become a key player in the electric vehicle supply chain.
Indonesia is one of the world’s biggest fossil fuel polluters, and Prabowo has backed gradually reducing the country’s reliance on them. However, his family retains ties to the coal industry and processing vast sums of nickel requires coal-fired power plants.
China’s Southeast Asian investments last year were the biggest in Indonesia, and Prabowo met Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) in his first foreign meeting after winning the election.
It signaled the importance he has placed on continuing to attract Beijing’s money, which has proven crucial to Indonesia’s economic growth.
On top of his early trips abroad, Prabowo’s Cabinet choices and his first budget after inauguration would also give a better indication as to his economic plans.
Indonesian Minister of Finance Sri Mulyani last week said that she had been asked to retain her role in the new government, which experts say is a signal to markets that there would be continuity.
“With Sri Mulyani joining his Cabinet, it shows that Prabowo will be very careful in terms of fiscal issues,” Center of Economic and Law Studies economist Bhima Yudhistira Adhinegara said. “That’s why Jokowi’s people are now hired again; it shows that Prabowo will be disciplined.”
A return to power for former US president Donald Trump would pose grave risks to Taiwan’s security, autonomy and the broader stability of the Indo-Pacific region. The stakes have never been higher as China aggressively escalates its pressure on Taiwan, deploying economic, military and psychological tactics aimed at subjugating the nation under Beijing’s control. The US has long acted as Taiwan’s foremost security partner, a bulwark against Chinese expansionism in the region. However, a second Trump presidency could upend decades of US commitments, introducing unpredictability that could embolden Beijing and severely compromise Taiwan’s position. While president, Trump’s foreign policy reflected a transactional
There appears to be a growing view among leaders and leading thinkers in Taiwan that their words and actions have no influence over how China approaches cross-Strait relations. According to this logic, China’s actions toward Taiwan are guided by China’s unwavering ambition to assert control over Taiwan. Many also believe Beijing’s approach is influenced by China’s domestic politics. As the thinking goes, former President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) made a good faith effort to demonstrate her moderation on cross-Strait issues throughout her tenure. During her 2016 inaugural address, Tsai sent several constructive signals, including by acknowledging the historical fact of interactions and
Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) has prioritized modernizing the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) to rival the US military, with many experts believing he would not act on Taiwan until the PLA is fully prepared to confront US forces. At the Chinese Communist Party’s 20th Party Congress in 2022, Xi emphasized accelerating this modernization, setting 2027 — the PLA’s centennial — as the new target, replacing the previous 2035 goal. US intelligence agencies said that Xi has directed the PLA to be ready for a potential invasion of Taiwan by 2027, although no decision on launching an attack had been made. Whether
Taiwanese men doing their alternative military service within Taipei’s and Taichung’s Department of Compulsory Military Service independently reported outlandish incidents of brainwashing. Below is a story related to propagandizing as it manifests overseas. One of my Chinese friends and a group of Taiwanese friends set off together from Sydney, Australia, in a tour group to northern Europe. The travel agency arranged for a Chinese tour guide to lead the group. The guide would start off on a propaganda blitz every afternoon at a set time, singing the praises of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). The Taiwanese members of the tour seemed