China late last month announced a series of stimulus measures to revive economic growth, but concerns still linger about the world’s second-largest economy, such as how quickly the new measures would start making a difference and whether their effects would be sustained over the long term. The worries represent the first major test of investor confidence in Beijing’s latest economic agenda.
Before the start of China’s national holiday last week, top leaders at the People’s Bank of China, the National Development and Reform Commission, the State Council and the Central Politburo of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) discussed several policy measures to rescue the struggling property sector. The measures include a 50 basis-point reduction in banks’ reserve requirement ratio, a 30 basis-point cut of the interest rate charged on its one-year policy loans, a 50 basis-point drop in mortgage rates on average and a 10 percent reduction in minimum down payments for people buying a second home.
The measures come as China’s economy slows and investor confidence continues to decrease, following a slew of negative data that raised alarms about falling consumer prices and domestic demand in the country. At the unscheduled politburo meeting on Sept. 26, Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) and other top CCP leaders vowed forceful measures to stabilize key sectors and restore growth momentum. Unlike its typical April, July and December sessions, last month’s meeting highlighted the urgency of the situation and underscored a notable shift in policymakers’ tone and policy substance to tackle the slowdown.
The stimulus measures buoyed investor confidence last week, as evidenced by market rallies in Shanghai, Shenzhen and Hong Kong. The launch of the stimulus measures also indicates that the Chinese government is clearly aware of the difficulties in reaching its GDP growth target of 5 percent this year, but its package of policies only addresses the symptoms of the country’s economic woes, not the cause.
First, many Chinese industries face overcapacity problems that cannot be solved in the short term.
Second, the Chinese economy is experiencing a balance sheet downtrend with debt piling up enormously in public and private sectors, after Beijing encouraged local governments, developers and enterprises to increase leverage for investment and construction, while most people borrowed too much to purchase property.
Third, insufficient demand and bearish consumer confidence need time to adjust, because people would not rush to buy property just because new measures are announced.
On the bright side, China’s measures are poised to stimulate the economy, although the speed of recovery would likely be slow. Still, it is unlikely that the economic downtrend would be reversed by simply stimulating domestic demand. Beijing’s monetary stimulus measures are unlikely to be effective without the support of fiscal stimulus at the same time.
More importantly, it is not that Chinese lack the money to buy property or the market lacks the liquidity for loans, but rather weak loan demand is prevailing in the private sector, which could limit the effects of the latest monetary easing policies.
The sharp stock rallies in China and Hong Kong would eventually lose momentum if investors continue to trade more on market sentiment than on the economic fundamentals. Many still remember the situation in early 2015, when Chinese authorities introduced several market-friendly measures that triggered bull runs.
However, the bubble burst in the middle of the year after investors realized that stock rallies did not mean the economic fundamentals were improving
This time, Chinese stocks could fluctuate before the economy shows it has a more solid footing. Investors should maintain a high degree of vigilance.
After nine days of holidays for the Lunar New Year, government agencies and companies are to reopen for operations today, including the Legislative Yuan. Many civic groups are expected to submit their recall petitions this week, aimed at removing many Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers from their seats. Since December last year, the KMT and Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) passed three controversial bills to paralyze the Constitutional Court, alter budgetary allocations and make recalling elected officials more difficult by raising the threshold. The amendments aroused public concern and discontent, sparking calls to recall KMT legislators. After KMT and TPP legislators again
Taiwan faces complex challenges like other Asia-Pacific nations, including demographic decline, income inequality and climate change. In fact, its challenges might be even more pressing. The nation struggles with rising income inequality, declining birthrates and soaring housing costs while simultaneously navigating intensifying global competition among major powers. To remain competitive in the global talent market, Taiwan has been working to create a more welcoming environment and legal framework for foreign professionals. One of the most significant steps in this direction was the enactment of the Act for the Recruitment and Employment of Foreign Professionals (外國專業人才延攬及僱用法) in 2018. Subsequent amendments in
US President Donald Trump on Saturday signed orders to impose tariffs on Canada, Mexico and China effective from today. Trump decided to slap 25 percent tariffs on goods from Mexico and Canada as well as 10 percent on those coming from China, but would only impose a 10 percent tariff on Canadian energy products, including oil and electricity. Canada and Mexico on Sunday quickly responded with retaliatory tariffs against the US, while countermeasures from China are expected soon. Nevertheless, Trump announced yesterday to delay tariffs on Mexico and Canada for a month and said he would hold further talks with
Taiwan’s undersea cables connecting it to the world were allegedly severed several times by a Chinese ship registered under a flag of convenience. As the vessel sailed, it used several different automatic identification systems (AIS) to create fake routes. That type of “shadow fleet” and “gray zone” tactics could create a security crisis in Taiwan and warrants response measures. The concept of a shadow fleet originates from the research of Elisabeth Braw, senior fellow at the Washington-based Atlantic Council. The phenomenon was initiated by authoritarian countries such as Iran, North Korea and Russia, which have been hit by international economic