A friend on dating apps recently said she is often presented with men who are lying about their age — or rather, as they tell it, being forced to lie. The culprit, they are eager to explain, is the algorithm.
“I am actually 57,” reads one profile she showed me, “but lowered my age, because of the [algorithms] algos, LOL.”
What is disturbing about her story is not that so many men are pretending to be younger than they are (What else is new?), but that they do not seem to know what an algorithm is. Their problem is not a sinister program preventing them from finding a younger woman. It is that many women set an age range they do not fall into. The algorithms are just doing their job, which is optimizing to find a solution for a given set of data.
Illustration: Constance Chou
Yet algorithms have become the villain of this technological era — blamed for depriving us of love, manipulating us on social media and increasing our rent. US Vice President Kamala Harris has issued a plan to address that last problem, proposing to crack down on real-estate companies that use “algorithmic price fixing” software to raise rents.
Algorithms are used throughout the economy to set prices and manage supply. Lowering the cost of housing is a major objective of the Harris campaign, so it not surprising that it is focusing on their use in real-estate. However, it is far from clear that algorithms are to blame for rising rents.
About one-third of rental units are priced using rent-setting software that is powered by algorithms that make use of lots of data from the local and comparable markets. The alternative — that is, landlords setting rents by looking at listings of comparable units and talking to brokers — is less precise.
PRICING SOFTWARE
The concern is that, if everyone uses pricing algorithms, landlords can collude and set above-market prices. Rising rents would seem to confirm the presence of collusion. As algorithms have become more common, rents have gone up.
In 2011, about 15 percent of rental units were priced using software, property management company RealPage said; by 2021 this figure was 30 percent. At the same time, the US population grew during this decade, as did the desire to live in popular areas, while the supply of housing lagged demand. This is a far more plausible explanation for the increase in rents.
Management companies that use pricing software tend to be more responsive to market conditions: They raise rents more when the market booms, but also cut rents more (and have fewer vacancies) when it falls, a study from two professors at the University of Pennsylvania’s Wharton School showed. This suggests they are not colluding so much as maximizing profits.
At the same time, the study shows that landlords who use pricing software affect the behavior of landlords who do not. In markets where more landlords use pricing algorithms, occupancy rates were lower and rents were 3 percent higher.
Harris supports a bill that would prohibit landlords from using the services of any company that coordinates pricing and supply information. It defines coordination as collecting data from multiple landlords, calculating a price based on that data with a “process that uses computation,” and recommending those lease terms. This would all be illegal if the lease terms were in violation of the Sherman Antitrust Act. However, it is easy to foresee a situation where a landlord has to worry about being sued by his tenants anytime he uses data and a computer program to decide what rent to charge.
HOUSING SUPPLY
What the bill calls “consciously parallel pricing coordination,” most economists would call “using technology to set prices more efficiently.” The bill effectively bars landlords from using the best tools and available data to discover the right price for their units. This would indeed make landlords less profitable. However, it would also make them less inclined to build more, or to lower rents when times are hard.
Besides, the main reason why rents increased was not collusion — it was a market short on supply, and that raises prices and leaves buyers with less market power. The way to restore power to tenants is not to outlaw the use of data. It is to encourage more building so consumers have more choices.
Algorithms do reflect market conditions. As housing markets across the US faced shortages in recent years, they contributed to prices rising even faster than they would have. However, algorithms are not the root cause of the problem.
Of course algorithms can be used for nefarious purposes, in real-estate or any market, and when people use them to collude or manipulate prices, they should be prosecuted. However, it is not clear this has happened in real-estate. Algorithms are often vilified, but they are a valuable innovation that can help markets become more efficient and offer more choices.
In either the housing market or the dating market, algorithms are not to blame. All they do is bring forth the underlying data that reflects a mismatch between demand and supply — whether the product is reasonably priced apartments or honest bachelors.
Allison Schrager is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist covering economics. A senior fellow at the Manhattan Institute, she is author of An Economist Walks Into a Brothel: And Other Unexpected Places to Understand Risk.
For Taipei, last year was a particularly dangerous period, with China stepping up coercive pressures on Taiwan amid signs of US President Joe Biden’s cognitive decline, which eventually led his Democratic Party to force him to abandon his re-election campaign. The political drift in the US bred uncertainty in Taiwan and elsewhere in the Indo-Pacific region about American strategic commitment and resolve. With America deeply involved in the wars in Ukraine and the Middle East, the last thing Washington wanted was a Taiwan Strait contingency, which is why Biden invested in personal diplomacy with China’s dictator Xi Jinping (習近平). The return of
The United States Agency for International Development (USAID) has long been a cornerstone of US foreign policy, advancing not only humanitarian aid but also the US’ strategic interests worldwide. The abrupt dismantling of USAID under US President Donald Trump ‘s administration represents a profound miscalculation with dire consequences for global influence, particularly in the Indo-Pacific. By withdrawing USAID’s presence, Washington is creating a vacuum that China is eager to fill, a shift that will directly weaken Taiwan’s international position while emboldening Beijing’s efforts to isolate Taipei. USAID has been a crucial player in countering China’s global expansion, particularly in regions where
Looking at the state of China’s economy this year, many experts have said that weak domestic demand and insufficient internal consumption might be its Achilles’ heel, with the latter being related to culture and demographics. Since Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) took office in 2013, he has been combating extravagance and corruption as well as rectifying a bad atmosphere. China expert Stephen Roach said the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) regulatory crackdown has been targeting Chinese tycoons, such as Alibaba Group Holding Ltd founder Jack Ma (馬雲), and opposing what the CCP defines as “excessively extravagant lifestyles,” such as playing too
With the manipulations of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), it is no surprise that this year’s budget plan would make government operations difficult. The KMT and the TPP passing malicious legislation in the past year has caused public ire to accumulate, with the pressure about to erupt like a volcano. Civic groups have successively backed recall petition drives and public consensus has reached a fever-pitch, with no let up during the long Lunar New Year holiday. The ire has even breached the mindsets of former staunch KMT and TPP supporters. Most Taiwanese have vowed to use