The renowned novelist J.K. Rowling, fueled by evident appearance-based prejudice, accused a few athletes at the Paris Olympics of being transgender competitors. While her intent to defend female athletes is understandable, this episode sheds light on a rarely addressed issue: The employment discrimination faced by non-transgender athletes, particularly those with differences in sexual development (DSD).
In most domestic and international competitions, biological sex is used to separate competitors.
However, consider female athletes with complete androgen insensitivity syndrome (CAIS), who possess XY chromosomes. These athletes are born with external female characteristics and raised as girls, only to be diagnosed with XY chromosomes during puberty due to the absence of menstruation. Should these women not be guaranteed protection from discrimination?
In sports, fairness is a core issue that often overshadows inclusivity. Competing against opponents with natural advantages in body size, strength and speed is commonplace and generally accepted as a matter of individual genetic makeup. Just as some athletes are naturally taller or stronger, facing a female athlete with CAIS should be no different. These athletes do not possess the typical male physiological advantages, and their performance falls within the normative range for female physiology. However, the complexity of biological sex might be exaggerated, leading to the perception that these athletes pose an unfair threat to other female competitors.
There are two categories of athletes with DSD who compete alongside typical female athletes: 46XY-AIS (androgen insensitivity syndrome) individuals, who are genetically male but resistant to androgens, and 46XX-CAH (congenital adrenal hyperplasia) individuals, who are genetically female but exhibit atypical hormone levels. The eligibility of the first category is intuitively denied, while the eligibility of the second is intuitively accepted. However, it is actually the androgen levels of the second category that may place typical female athletes at a disadvantage.
Apart from the previously mentioned CAIS athletes, another group of XY female athletes are those with partial androgen insensitivity syndrome (PAIS). Members of this group partially respond to androgens, and their external characteristics might fall between typical male and female traits. Thus, using external checks to determine sex might reveal traits that do not align with traditional binary standards, making classification more challenging.
Since PAIS involves some androgen influence, it remains uncertain how this might manifest under intense training, potentially raising concerns about fairness during competitions. Consequently, this group faces greater challenges in the gender verification processes required for competition eligibility. Given that gender equality is a modern goal across all fields, why not begin by ensuring that female athletes with CAIS, who face no such controversy, are fully included?
It is crucial to clarify the symptoms and mechanisms of androgen insensitivity syndrome, understand these athletes’ biological sex and its impact on physical development, and prevent misunderstandings from fostering prejudice. Born with the physiological limitations that give them a female appearance without the corresponding internal anatomy or male-like physical capabilities, these athletes should be allowed to shine in the sports arena. If they can succeed through their efforts, why not provide them with a more inclusive environment where they can tell their own life stories, showcase their talents and contribute to the legacy of sustainable talent development?
Chu Jou-juo is a professor in the Department of Labor Relations at National Chung-cheng University.
The United States Agency for International Development (USAID) has long been a cornerstone of US foreign policy, advancing not only humanitarian aid but also the US’ strategic interests worldwide. The abrupt dismantling of USAID under US President Donald Trump ‘s administration represents a profound miscalculation with dire consequences for global influence, particularly in the Indo-Pacific. By withdrawing USAID’s presence, Washington is creating a vacuum that China is eager to fill, a shift that will directly weaken Taiwan’s international position while emboldening Beijing’s efforts to isolate Taipei. USAID has been a crucial player in countering China’s global expansion, particularly in regions where
US President Donald Trump has gotten off to a head-spinning start in his foreign policy. He has pressured Denmark to cede Greenland to the United States, threatened to take over the Panama Canal, urged Canada to become the 51st US state, unilaterally renamed the Gulf of Mexico to “the Gulf of America” and announced plans for the United States to annex and administer Gaza. He has imposed and then suspended 25 percent tariffs on Canada and Mexico for their roles in the flow of fentanyl into the United States, while at the same time increasing tariffs on China by 10
With the manipulations of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), it is no surprise that this year’s budget plan would make government operations difficult. The KMT and the TPP passing malicious legislation in the past year has caused public ire to accumulate, with the pressure about to erupt like a volcano. Civic groups have successively backed recall petition drives and public consensus has reached a fever-pitch, with no let up during the long Lunar New Year holiday. The ire has even breached the mindsets of former staunch KMT and TPP supporters. Most Taiwanese have vowed to use
Despite the steady modernization of the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA), the international community is skeptical of its warfare capabilities. Late last month, US think tank RAND Corp published two reports revealing the PLA’s two greatest hurdles: personnel challenges and structural difficulties. The first RAND report, by Jennie W. Wenger, titled Factors Shaping the Future of China’s Military, analyzes the PLA’s obstacles with recruitment, stating that China has long been committed to attracting young talent from top universities to augment the PLA’s modernization needs. However, the plan has two major constraints: demographic changes and the adaptability of the PLA’s military culture.