Recently inaugurated Japanese Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba said he wants to station Japanese troops in Guam, for the first time since 1944. He also wants to realize his vision of an Asian NATO, with the US-Japan alliance as a foundation, expanded to a circle of friendly and like-minded nations. That vision would combine existing diplomatic and security pacts, including the Quadrilateral Security Dialogue of Japan, the US, Australia and India; the AUKUS security pact of Australia, the UK and the US; and the nascent rapprochement between Japan and South Korea.
China is not happy with these disruptive proposals, and Washington is not particularly impressed with the idea of an Asian NATO either, dismissing it as “hasty.” Even recently appointed Japanese Minister of Foreign Affairs Takeshi Iwaya yesterday told a news conference in Tokyo that it was “an idea for the future,” to consider in the mid-to-long term. Whether the ideas come to fruition, Ishiba’s new approaches to regional security are upsetting the apple cart.
There are two takeaways from the first days of Ishiba’s administration.
First, despite his reputation for being pro-China and intensely critical of the policies of late former Japanese prime minister Shinzo Abe — who was perceived as pro-Taiwan and instrumental in changing Japan’s constitutional security posture from purely defensive to more pro-active — Ishiba is fully aware of the threat posed by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and has had a close relationship with Taiwan in the past few years.
For the importance he places on defense, look at his Cabinet picks: Iwaya, with whom Ishiba has previously worked closely, and Japanese Minister of Defense Gen Nakatani are both former defense ministers, as is Ishiba himself. The prime minister is retaining Yoshimasa Hayashi, top confidant to former Japanese prime minister Fumio Kishida, as his chief Cabinet secretary, signaling a degree of continuity with the previous administration. Hayashi is also a former defense minister.
Like Abe, Ishiba has argued for the removal of Article 9-2 of Japan’s constitution, which prohibits the Japanese Self-Defense Forces from having combat power. He also understands the importance of leveraging security alliances and pacts. Ishiba yesterday agreed with US President Joe Biden on a telephone call to continue bolstering the US-Japan alliance and building ties with mutual allies in the region.
The second takeaway is that among the continuity is considerable flux. Concerns that a previously pro-China Ishiba might not be willing to join coalitions clearly designed to address the CCP’s increased aggressiveness appear to be baseless. It is not Ishiba that has changed; it is the regional security situation. The CCP’s actions necessitate the evolution of the Japanese approach. Kishida, too, evolved from his pacifist, China-friendly instincts to consolidating Abe’s controversial constitutional changes on defense posture and on radically increasing Japan’s defense spending as a percentage of GDP.
Writing for Project Syndicate, former special adviser to Abe’s Cabinet Tomohiko Taniguchi said that Ishiba’s idea of an Asian NATO is a nonstarter, as the principle of collective defense encapsulated in NATO’s Article 5 would be unacceptable to the Japanese Diet and to many countries in the region, which would be wary of being locked into an obligation to defend Taiwan should the CCP come calling.
Nevertheless, nobody wants war, and effective deterrence is the name of the game. The trend is toward alliance building, as no one power in the region can stand up to the increasing might of the Chinese People’s Liberation Army. Close monitoring on exactly how this dynamic evolves is needed; Ishiba’s arrival demonstrates how a new face can throw new complications into the mix, while signaling continuity.
In a meeting with Haitian Minister of Foreign Affairs Jean-Victor Harvel Jean-Baptiste on Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) vowed to continue providing aid to Haiti. Taiwan supports Haiti with development in areas such as agriculture, healthcare and education through initiatives run by the Taiwan International Cooperation and Development Fund (ICDF). The nation it has established itself as a responsible, peaceful and innovative actor committed to global cooperation, Jean-Baptiste said. Testimonies such as this give Taiwan a voice in the global community, where it often goes unheard. Taiwan’s reception in Haiti also contrasts with how China has been perceived in countries in the region
The world has become less predictable, less rules-based, and more shaped by the impulses of strongmen and short-term dealmaking. Nowhere is this more consequential than in East Asia, where the fate of democratic Taiwan hinges on how global powers manage — or mismanage — tensions with an increasingly assertive China. The return of Donald Trump to the White House has deepened the global uncertainty, with his erratic, highly personalized foreign-policy approach unsettling allies and adversaries alike. Trump appears to treat foreign policy like a reality show. Yet, paradoxically, the global unpredictability may offer Taiwan unexpected deterrence. For China, the risk of provoking the
On April 13, I stood in Nanan (南安), a Bunun village in southern Hualien County’s Jhuosi Township (卓溪), absorbing lessons from elders who spoke of the forest not as backdrop, but as living presence — relational, sacred and full of spirit. I was there with fellow international students from National Dong Hwa University (NDHU) participating in a field trip that would become one of the most powerful educational experiences of my life. Ten days later, a news report in the Taipei Times shattered the spell: “Formosan black bear shot and euthanized in Hualien” (April 23, page 2). A tagged bear, previously released
Young supporters of former Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) chairman Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) were detained for posting the names and photographs of judges and prosecutors believed to be overseeing the Core Pacific City redevelopment corruption case. The supporters should be held responsible for their actions. As for Ko’s successor, TPP Chairman Huang Kuo-chang (黃國昌), he should reflect on whether his own comments are provocative and whether his statements might be misunderstood. Huang needs to apologize to the public and the judiciary. In the article, “Why does sorry seem to be the hardest word?” the late political commentator Nan Fang Shuo (南方朔) wrote
RSS