As summer in the northern hemisphere draws to a close, hundreds of temperature records have been broken, and there is a roughly 95 percent chance that this year would beat last year as the hottest year since measurements began. However, millions of people do not need data to tell them that — they are living through it.
The US last year experienced 28 climate-related disasters that each caused at least US$1 billion worth of damage, while China experienced extreme heat and devastating floods, with a typhoon displacing more than 120,000 people in Beijing.
It is clear that warming is occurring faster than expected, and that the world needs to pull an emergency brake on rising temperatures. China and the US, as global superpowers, could work together to drive change, and they recently held a high-level meeting to discuss opportunities for reducing greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions.
As these conversations continue ahead of this year’s UN Climate Change Conference (COP29) and into next year, they should focus on dealing with the climate crisis that has already arrived. To address it requires increased efforts to mitigate emissions of super pollutants, which are responsible for more than half of climate change.
Super pollutants, specifically warming agents such as methane, nitrous oxide, tropospheric ozone and hydrofluorocarbons are tens, hundreds or even thousands of times more potent than carbon dioxide per tonne.
Methane is a GHG that is roughly 80 times more potent than carbon dioxide over a 20-year period and contributes to ozone smog. However, it remains in the atmosphere for only about a decade, whereas carbon dioxide can last centuries. This means that reducing methane emissions is the fastest and most effective way to fight climate change and improve air quality.
Cleaner air is especially important for communities living or working near cattle farms, oil and gas infrastructure, landfills and other pollution sources. Deteriorating air quality has become a pressing public health problem, and reducing methane levels in the atmosphere would lower rates of death and asthma, and lessen the severity of wildfires, flooding, hurricanes and other extreme weather events.
The good news is that there are ways to cut methane emissions by as much as 45 percent, which could reduce warming by 0.3°C by 2040, bolster energy and food security, and put the world on a path to a healthier future.
In addition to the broad public support for government intervention to address methane emissions, there is also global consensus on the need to address non-carbon dioxide GHGs. To date, 158 countries have signed the Global Methane Pledge to cut emissions by 30 percent by 2030. At last year’s COP28 in Dubai, countries agreed to submit updated 2035 emissions reduction targets, known as nationally determined contributions (NDCs), that are economy-wide, cover all GHGs and are aligned with limiting global warming to 1.5°C.
Increased global attention to non-carbon dioxide GHGs could not come at a better time, as updated NDCs are due in February next year.
While NDCs contain meaningful carbon dioxide reduction targets, they often lack concrete, measurable goals for cutting super pollutants. Countries must recognize that this approach does not fully address the fight against climate change and raise their ambitions accordingly.
Strong 2035 targets for methane and other super pollutants are necessary to achieve net zero GHG emissions by 2050 and would reduce potentially irreversible planetary changes.
Methane has historically been hard to track, making it difficult to include specific targets in NDCs. However, after addressing critical funding and technology gaps, methane-detecting satellites are improving data collection. Satellite programs launched after the previous NDC update, including MethaneSAT, Carbon Mapper and the WasteMAP, have helped local authorities pinpoint and address emissions sources. Given these developments, there is no excuse for submitting NDCs without methane targets.
China and the US can build on the climate commitments they made in last year’s Sunnylands Statement by including robust super pollutant targets in their updated NDCs. The Chinese government has expressed its intention to do so, while the US has shown a willingness to implement ambitious climate policies, including support for research on emissions reduction innovations.
The world must unite to reduce super pollutants and usher in a new era of cleaner air, improved food production and greater energy security. The public overwhelmingly supports measuring and mitigating methane emissions across sectors, and it is time for governments to listen.
A good first step would be for the US and China to set quantifiable non-carbon dioxide targets in their revised NDCs and encourage other large methane-emitting countries to do the same.
Marcelo Mena, CEO of Global Methane Hub, is a former Chilean minister of the environment. Sarah Ann Smith is energy program director at Global Methane Hub.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
In the US’ National Security Strategy (NSS) report released last month, US President Donald Trump offered his interpretation of the Monroe Doctrine. The “Trump Corollary,” presented on page 15, is a distinctly aggressive rebranding of the more than 200-year-old foreign policy position. Beyond reasserting the sovereignty of the western hemisphere against foreign intervention, the document centers on energy and strategic assets, and attempts to redraw the map of the geopolitical landscape more broadly. It is clear that Trump no longer sees the western hemisphere as a peaceful backyard, but rather as the frontier of a new Cold War. In particular,
When it became clear that the world was entering a new era with a radical change in the US’ global stance in US President Donald Trump’s second term, many in Taiwan were concerned about what this meant for the nation’s defense against China. Instability and disruption are dangerous. Chaos introduces unknowns. There was a sense that the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) might have a point with its tendency not to trust the US. The world order is certainly changing, but concerns about the implications for Taiwan of this disruption left many blind to how the same forces might also weaken
As the new year dawns, Taiwan faces a range of external uncertainties that could impact the safety and prosperity of its people and reverberate in its politics. Here are a few key questions that could spill over into Taiwan in the year ahead. WILL THE AI BUBBLE POP? The global AI boom supported Taiwan’s significant economic expansion in 2025. Taiwan’s economy grew over 7 percent and set records for exports, imports, and trade surplus. There is a brewing debate among investors about whether the AI boom will carry forward into 2026. Skeptics warn that AI-led global equity markets are overvalued and overleveraged
Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi on Monday announced that she would dissolve parliament on Friday. Although the snap election on Feb. 8 might appear to be a domestic affair, it would have real implications for Taiwan and regional security. Whether the Takaichi-led coalition can advance a stronger security policy lies in not just gaining enough seats in parliament to pass legislation, but also in a public mandate to push forward reforms to upgrade the Japanese military. As one of Taiwan’s closest neighbors, a boost in Japan’s defense capabilities would serve as a strong deterrent to China in acting unilaterally in the
RSS