The Australian Senate and the Dutch House of Representatives have passed motions clarifying that UN Resolution 2758 concerns only China’s representation at the UN and has nothing to do with Taiwan.
Legislators from the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) have called for support for their legislative proposal that would reject Beijing’s distortion and manipulation of the UN resolution that it says justifies its claims over Taiwan, saying that the UN statement has nothing to do with Taiwan’s sovereignty and its international status.
The text of the UN resolution was brief, recognizing the People’s Republic of China as the only legitimate representative of China to the UN without mentioning “Taiwan” or even “the Republic of China.”
There would have been no room for manipulation, but Beijing disingenuously relates the resolution to its “one China principle.”
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) responded by neglecting the DPP’s legislative proposal. Is that not walking into a diplomatic trap set by Beijing?
Historically speaking, it was Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石) who defined the resolution as “expelling our country and admitting the ‘bandits,’” rejecting a resolution proposed by Saudi Arabia and backed by the US, which would have reserved a seat for Taiwan at the UN.
Now that the KMT has long given up “retaking the mainland,” while its former mantra of “gentlemen cannot coexist with bandits” has been transformed into “one family across the Taiwan Strait,” there is no reason to oppose Taiwan’s participation at the UN. However, not daring to say no to Beijing, the KMT has no choice but to fool the public with the same old excuse — that it would provoke China.
How about the TPP?
As a newcomer in the political arena, the party does not have the KMT’s historical baggage. TPP caucus whip Huang Kuo-chang (黃國昌), a former member of the New Power Party, rose to power after the Sunflower Movement, a protest movement against the passage of the KMT-proposed cross-strait service trade agreement.
There is no reason for Huang to reject or neglect the DPP’s legislative proposal. The TPP does so just because it wants to oppose what the ruling party proposes, not to mention China’s Taiwan Affairs Office’s support for TPP Chairman Ko Wen-je (柯文哲), and TPP Legislator Chang Chi-kai’s (張啟楷) proposal to freeze the Presidential Office’s budget in retaliation for the DPP’s “political persecution” of Ko.
Has this not shown the TPP’s true nature?
In the Chinese literary classic Journey to the West (西遊記), the Monkey King defeats the White Bone Demon (白骨精). UN Resolution 2758 is the demon-revealing mirror reflecting the true nature of the KMT and the TPP.
The international community is interpreting the resolution in a correct way to show Taiwanese that they do not have to bow to Beijing’s pressure.
As the ruling party, the DPP’s proposal is a response to that support that shows the government is also not intimidated by Beijing, and is willing to overcome its diplomatic predicament and put an end to self-isolation. Now is the best time for Taiwan to enter the world stage.
Taiwanese should pressure the KMT and the TPP into supporting proposals that are beneficial for enhancing the nation’s international status, as they have a majority in the legislature. This would help ensure that Beijing and the rest of the world do not get the wrong signal.
The nation needs opposition parties that are loyal to Taiwan, as this would avoid the well-being of Taiwanese becoming a bet in the future democratic elections.
Hong Tsun-ming is a policy specialist in the Taiwan Statebuilding Party.
Translated by Fion Khan
As it has striven toward superiority in most measures of the Asian military balance, China is now ready to challenge the undersea balance of power, long dominated by the United States, a decisive advantage crucial to its ability to deter blockade and invasion of Taiwan by the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). America expended enormous treasure to develop the technology, logistics, training, and personnel to emerge victorious in the Cold War undersea struggle against the former Soviet Union, and to remain superior today; the US is not used to considering the People’s Liberation Army Navy (PLAN)
The annual summit of East Asia and other events around the ASEAN summit in October and November every year have become the most important gathering of leaders in the Indo-Pacific region. This year, as Laos is the chair of ASEAN, it was privileged to host all of the ministerial and summit meetings associated with ASEAN. Besides the main summit, this included the high-profile East Asia Summit, ASEAN summits with its dialogue partners and the ASEAN Plus Three Summit with China, Japan and South Korea. The events and what happens around them have changed over the past 15 years from a US-supported, ASEAN-led
Lately, China has been inviting Taiwanese influencers to travel to China’s Xinjiang region to make films, weaving a “beautiful Xinjiang” narrative as an antidote to the international community’s criticisms by creating a Potemkin village where nothing is awry. Such manipulations appear harmless — even compelling enough for people to go there — but peeling back the shiny veneer reveals something more insidious, something that is hard to ignore. These films are not only meant to promote tourism, but also harbor a deeper level of political intentions. Xinjiang — a region of China continuously listed in global human rights reports —
President William Lai’s (賴清德) first Double Ten National Day address had two strategic goals. For domestic affairs, the speech aimed to foster consensus on national identity, strengthen the country and unite the Taiwanese against a Chinese invasion. In terms of cross-strait relations, the speech aimed to mitigate tensions in the Taiwan Strait and promote the coexistence and prosperity of the People’s Republic of China (PRC) in China and the Republic of China (ROC). Lai is taking a different stance from previous Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) administrations on domestic political issues. During his speech, he said: “The PRC could not be the
RSS