Dangerous flash points in Asia include the Taiwan Strait and South China Sea conflicts (such as the clashes between China and the Philippines) that have become hot issues to debate at international level. Besides that, the Gulf of Thailand might be the next geopolitical flash point.
These conflicts occur when people claim ownership of the world’s limited resources to fulfill their unlimited needs. The UN established peacekeeping missions based on three principles; consent of the parties, impartiality and no use of force (except in self-defense and in defense of the mandate).
Whereas the peacekeeping missions are proposed to help nations to find appropriate solutions that aim at dealing with difficult situations and achieving peace, it seems like a peaceful life is difficult to obtain because of unpredictable and turbulent circumstances in the world.
To fulfill unlimited human needs, some nations (especially superpowers) tend to expand their maritime boundaries, which enable them to gain access to mineral and biological resources, as well as maritime gateways. Actually, all nations (and all people) are equal. They have the right to live in peace and a no-harm rule should be implemented. Although the world’s limited resources are available, they should not harm other states to satisfy their unlimited needs.
Instead of making war, they should resolve problems through negotiations with accountability to reach an agreement and they should become partners in various issues, such as climate change, landslides, air pollution, biological resources and transportation.
Being partners would support peacekeeping rather than nations being competitors or enemies.
Phathara-on Wesarat is head of the bachelor of business administration program in the department of humanities and social sciences at Prince of Songkla University in Thailand.
With escalating US-China competition and mutual distrust, the trend of supply chain “friend shoring” in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic and the fragmentation of the world into rival geopolitical blocs, many analysts and policymakers worry the world is retreating into a new cold war — a world of trade bifurcation, protectionism and deglobalization. The world is in a new cold war, said Robin Niblett, former director of the London-based think tank Chatham House. Niblett said he sees the US and China slowly reaching a modus vivendi, but it might take time. The two great powers appear to be “reversing carefully
Taiwan is facing multiple economic challenges due to internal and external pressures. Internal challenges include energy transition, upgrading industries, a declining birthrate and an aging population. External challenges are technology competition between the US and China, international supply chain restructuring and global economic uncertainty. All of these issues complicate Taiwan’s economic situation. Taiwan’s reliance on fossil fuel imports not only threatens the stability of energy supply, but also goes against the global trend of carbon reduction. The government should continue to promote renewable energy sources such as wind and solar power, as well as energy storage technology, to diversify energy supply. It
Former Japanese minister of defense Shigeru Ishiba has been elected as president of the governing Liberal Democratic Party (LDP) and would be approved as prime minister in parliament today. Ishiba is a familiar face for Taiwanese, as he has visited the nation several times. His popularity among Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) lawmakers has grown as a result of his multiple meetings and encounters with legislators and prominent figures in the government. The DPP and the LDP have close ties and have long maintained warm relations. Ishiba in August 2020 praised Taiwan’s
On Thursday last week, the International Crisis Group (ICG) issued a well-researched report titled “The Widening Schism across the Taiwan Strait,” which focused on rising tensions between Taiwan and China, making a number of recommendations on how to avoid conflict. While it is of course laudable that a respected international organization such as the ICG is willing to think through possible avenues toward a peaceful resolution, the report contains a couple of fundamental flaws in the way it approaches the issue. First, it attempts to present a “balanced approach” by pushing back equally against Taiwan’s perceived transgressions as against Beijing’s military threats
RSS