Two German naval vessels, a supply ship and a frigate, passed through the Taiwan Strait on the way to Jakarta earlier this month, the first time in 22 years that a German warship has transited the Strait.
German Minister of Defense Boris Pistorius announced the transit in Berlin on Friday last week, saying that “international waters are international waters,” and that the transit was in full compliance with international law.
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) views the situation differently. Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs spokeswoman Mao Ning (毛寧) said that the Taiwan Strait is part of China’s internal waters and therefore part of its exclusive economic zone, and that the passage of the German vessels was provocative, threatened China’s sovereignty, and could put regional peace and stability at risk.
The Taiwan Strait being part of China’s internal waters is consistent with the CCP’s territorial claims over Taiwan. If other nations pay lip service to China’s “one China” principle in their individual “one China” policies, the CPP can say it has a legitimate basis for its “internal waters” claim.
A Ministry of Foreign Affairs news release in June 2022 said that Chinese officials had repeatedly claimed in meetings with the US that the Taiwan Strait does not constitute international waters. The news release refuted these claims and the ministry “reiterate[d] that the Taiwan Strait is international waters and that freedom of the high seas as defined in international law applies to waters beyond Taiwan’s territorial sea limits.”
The German warship transit was the action backing up Pistorius’ words. A more explicit clarification of individual governments exercising their rights of passage through international waters needs to be made to push back against the CCP’s claims.
Ships proceeding south from Japan can take onboard containers in various locations, including Taiwan and the Philippines, sail into the South China Sea and on to Singapore, and from there go through the Strait of Malacca and on to India and Europe. It is also an oil route connecting East Asia with the Middle East. Recognition of the Taiwan Strait as international waters has real and significant implications for global trade.
Looked at from this perspective, one can see yet another aspect of the CCP’s designs over Taiwan as an extension of its claims over virtually all of the South China Sea that forms the basis of the current tensions between Beijing and Manila, and a potential new issue between Beijing and Tokyo.
Japan’s Nikkei Asia magazine has reported that China might be preparing to establish a Ryukyu research center, possibly to back up new CCP rhetoric questioning Japan’s sovereignty over the Ryukyu island chain, which includes Okinawa as well as the Senkaku Islands, known in Taiwan and China as the Diaoyutais (釣魚台). This is not the first time we have seen evidence of CCP officials and Chinese nationalists bringing up the “undecided status” of the islands.
Exactly what is behind the CCP’s “Ryuku card” strategy is unclear. Looking at a map of the Ryukyu islands arc extending from the southern tip of Japan to the east coast of Taiwan, it is not difficult to see how it would impact China’s ambitions to control the first island chain and shipping lanes.
Although the CCP’s rhetoric over Taiwan and the South China Sea is ostensibly about reclaiming its territory lost during its “century of humiliation,” it appears in no rush to take back land in Manchuria stolen by Russia in the 1958 Treaty of Aigun and 1860 Treaty of Beijing.
This apparent contradiction is behind President William Lai’s (賴清德) invocation of Aigun and why the treaties have sparked such interest in Taiwan and overseas.
The time is ripe to respond to the CCP’s false narratives with facts and increased scrutiny.
Donald Trump’s return to the White House has offered Taiwan a paradoxical mix of reassurance and risk. Trump’s visceral hostility toward China could reinforce deterrence in the Taiwan Strait. Yet his disdain for alliances and penchant for transactional bargaining threaten to erode what Taiwan needs most: a reliable US commitment. Taiwan’s security depends less on US power than on US reliability, but Trump is undermining the latter. Deterrence without credibility is a hollow shield. Trump’s China policy in his second term has oscillated wildly between confrontation and conciliation. One day, he threatens Beijing with “massive” tariffs and calls China America’s “greatest geopolitical
US President Donald Trump’s seemingly throwaway “Taiwan is Taiwan” statement has been appearing in headlines all over the media. Although it appears to have been made in passing, the comment nevertheless reveals something about Trump’s views and his understanding of Taiwan’s situation. In line with the Taiwan Relations Act, the US and Taiwan enjoy unofficial, but close economic, cultural and national defense ties. They lack official diplomatic relations, but maintain a partnership based on shared democratic values and strategic alignment. Excluding China, Taiwan maintains a level of diplomatic relations, official or otherwise, with many nations worldwide. It can be said that
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) made the astonishing assertion during an interview with Germany’s Deutsche Welle, published on Friday last week, that Russian President Vladimir Putin is not a dictator. She also essentially absolved Putin of blame for initiating the war in Ukraine. Commentators have since listed the reasons that Cheng’s assertion was not only absurd, but bordered on dangerous. Her claim is certainly absurd to the extent that there is no need to discuss the substance of it: It would be far more useful to assess what drove her to make the point and stick so
The central bank has launched a redesign of the New Taiwan dollar banknotes, prompting questions from Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislators — “Are we not promoting digital payments? Why spend NT$5 billion on a redesign?” Many assume that cash will disappear in the digital age, but they forget that it represents the ultimate trust in the system. Banknotes do not become obsolete, they do not crash, they cannot be frozen and they leave no record of transactions. They remain the cleanest means of exchange in a free society. In a fully digitized world, every purchase, donation and action leaves behind data.
RSS