Think back to late June and early last month. The French far right was favored to win a snap parliamentary election. Judges appointed by Donald Trump were conveniently resolving the legal woes of the former US president, who seemed to be gliding to victory after US President Joe Biden’s disastrous performance in a debate.
Meanwhile, Britain was getting a Labour government, a new anti-immigration party led by the chief Brexiteer, British Member of Parliament Nigel Farage, had made unprecedented gains. Faced with it all, pundits warned that a wave of populist “anti-incumbency” rage was sweeping across the world’s democracies.
The commentariat’s bleak outlook should since have been tempered by new sources of political hope. Not only is there little evidence of a “populist wave” — a metaphor that conjures images of far-right parties inevitably rising to power in many countries — but recent experience suggests workable strategies for countering such forces.
One lesson from the past few months might sound like a truism: All parties that value democracy must unite to face down anti-democratic threats. This is what happened in France, to many pundits’ surprise. Left-wing parties formed the New Popular Front, evoking memories of the fight against fascism in the 1930s, when socialist leader Leon Blum led a coalition of communists, socialists and liberals to defend the republic.
After French President Emmanuel Macron’s surprise decision to dissolve the French National Assembly, the left got creative, while Marine le Pen’s far-right National Rally was caught flat-footed.
More to the point, the New Popular Front did not merely appeal to abstract democratic values; it also repeatedly called attention to the far right’s pro-business plans, making clear that the National Rally is not the pro-worker party that it claims to be.
A second lesson comes from the US, where few anticipated the enthusiasm and outpouring of joy that would greet the new Democratic ticket. US Vice President Kamala Harris, an incumbent, has masterfully presented herself as a representative of change, in contrast to Trump and Biden.
Her pick for vice president, Minnesota Governor Tim Walz, has delighted many with his characterization of the Republican ticket, particularly Trump’s vice-presidential pick, US Senator J.D. Vance, as “weird.”
Finally, it seems, Democrats play the kind of rhetorical hardball that the right always has.
Of course, self-declared centrists preaching civil discourse are less pleased. They are reminding Democrats that former US secretary of state Hillary Rodham Clinton’s comments about “deplorables” came to haunt her 2016 campaign for president. Yet to condemn the “weird” label as childish name-calling misses the point. In the fight against far-right populism, this particular epithet can be especially effective.
After all, in claiming to speak for “the real people” or the “the silent majority,” far-right populists are presenting themselves as the representatives of normality. In Germany, one of the far-right party Alternative fur Deutschland’s slogans is: Deutschland, aber normal. The populists’ supposed base comprises what are always presented as “ordinary people” who are threatened by nefarious elites and dangerous “others.” That is how populists incite fear of already-vulnerable minorities, be they refugees or transgender people.
Savvy anti-populists should concentrate their rhetorical fire on populist leaders, rather than on their supporters. Vance is “weird” because he is obsessed with controlling women’s bodies and punishing the childless, and because he appears sympathetic toward monarchists and other assorted alt-right figures. The Republican Party now holds many positions that are far out of step with US political traditions; open admiration for autocrats is an obvious example. One can point all this out without suggesting that Republican voters themselves are weird. The point is to dispute the claim to normality by leaders who are anything but.
The far-right populists who claim to speak for the silent majority in fact represent a loud minority. There is nothing wrong with that as such; plenty of progressive movements started the same way.
However, movements that pretend to speak for the majority while vilifying everyone else pose a threat to democracy. It is no accident that populists who lose at the ballot box often resort to accusations of fraud.
As they supposedly represent the silent majority, an electoral loss can be attributed only to foul play, usually by “liberal elites” who supposedly somehow silenced the majority.
Anti-populists should recognize that majorities do not in fact support far-right populist forces. The new Labour government’s first few weeks in power have confirmed this salutary insight. The country has experienced its worst riots in more than a decade as disinformation has fueled racist violence. While being careful not to endorse violence directly, Farage has made it sound like the rioters have legitimate grievances shared by the silent majority.
Yet polls show that only one in three Britons support the broader anti-migration protests, whereas opposition to the riots is overwhelming.
True, the argument “We are more” — a slogan coined by anti-populist protesters in Germany — only goes so far. While the far right falsely claims a monopoly on normality, the truth is that far-right parties are becoming normalized as more center-right politicians copy their rhetoric or enter coalitions with them. A stance focused on defending democracy is necessary, but not sufficient, to counter this trend; one must offer a positive vision, too. That is what the French left and Labour did this summer.
Those canvassing for Harris will be asked on doorsteps what she truly stands for, beyond being an alternative to Trump-Vance weirdness. It is a legitimate question, and one for which anti-populists must provide a good answer.
Jan-Werner Mueller is a professor of politics at Princeton University.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers
Gogoro Inc was once a rising star and a would-be unicorn in the years prior to its debut on the NASDAQ in 2022, as its environmentally friendly technology and stylish design attracted local young people. The electric scooter and battery swapping services provider is bracing for a major personnel shakeup following the abrupt resignation on Friday of founding chairman Horace Luke (陸學森) as chief executive officer. Luke’s departure indicates that Gogoro is sinking into the trough of unicorn disillusionment, with the company grappling with poor financial performance amid a slowdown in demand at home and setbacks in overseas expansions. About 95
RSS