More than halfway through this year of momentous elections, liberal democratic parties have mostly managed to hold the line against the advance of the dark forces of nationalist populism in Europe.
However, it is too early to declare victory for this firewall against the extreme right. The US presidential election could have destabilizing knock-on effects in Europe and beyond if former US president Donald Trump returns to the White House. On the other hand, a victory for US Vice President Kamala Harris, who has restored the Democrats’ hopes of retaining power in just three weeks since US President Biden pulled out of the race, could energize progressive forces worldwide.
In Europe, the loose alliance of mainstream parties that has kept the forces of illiberalism, intolerance and bigotry out of power in Brussels, Paris, Berlin and Warsaw is fragile. They have been aided by the congenital inability of hard-right parties, which won about 25 percent of the vote in EU-wide elections in June, to form a united front in the European Parliament. Despite the attempt of Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban to forge a single nationalist Internationale, there are now three rival euroskeptic rightist groupings instead of the two in the previous legislature.
Illustration: Mountain People
In addition to personal rivalries, these groupings differ over whether to support Ukraine against Russian aggression, as well as over whether to try to transform the EU into a looser grouping of sovereign states or to break away from the union completely. The more “respectable,” pragmatic national conservatives around Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni want to keep their distance from more aggressively nativist parties, which advocate expelling immigrants who have acquired citizenship or residence rights.
Last month, an ad hoc coalition of conservatives, socialists, liberals and Greens united to re-elect Ursula von der Leyen as European Commission president after she made contradictory promises to stick to net zero carbon emission targets, boost industrial competitiveness and ease the regulatory burden on farmers. She is likely to retain the same broad support when she presents her full college of commissioners, nominated by national governments, next month, although one or two nominees might well be rejected in the street theater of confirmation hearings that give the newly elected parliament an opportunity to flex its muscles.
The real challenge for Von der Leyen would come when she tries to enact new legislation to enforce sensitive aspects of the European green deal to fight the climate crisis and to protect the environment and biodiversity. Her own conservatives could team up tactically with the far right to vote down measures on nature conservation or pesticides that were bitterly contested in the last legislature. This sort of opportunistic issue-by-issue switch might not amount to a far-right power shift, but it would be more worrying if it extended to making migration policy more inhumane.
Such a shift occurred in the French parliament last year, when French President Emmanuel Macron’s centrists let the conservative Les Republicains toughen up an immigration bill with discriminatory measures against foreigners that were adopted with the support of the hard-right National Rally (RN), only for it to be struck down by the constitutional council. The result was an emboldening of the RN’s political agenda.
In a snap general election in June and last month, millions of French people voted tactically for political adversaries rather than let the RN convert its triumphant first-round score into parliamentary dominance. As a result, the French National Assembly is deadlocked, with no party or alliance holding a majority. This has weakened Macron’s influence in the EU, but at least the “republican front” firewall has kept the populists at bay for now.
It remains to be seen whether France ends up with a center-right minority government, a minority left-wing New Popular Front administration (less likely), or perhaps an Italian-style technocratic Cabinet until fresh elections can be called in a year’s time. While politics takes a summer breather during the Paris Olympics, there is widespread relief that Marine Le Pen’s national populists have been stopped at the gates of power, tinged with foreboding that this might only boost her chances of winning the 2027 French presidential election.
While the center is holding at EU level, populist nationalists continue to make inroads in national politics in several parts of Europe. The Netherlands has its first far-right-led ruling coalition, even though the outspoken anti-Islam Freedom party leader Geert Wilders was blocked from taking the prime ministership. Pro-Russian Slovakian Prime Minister Robert Fico, whose ally won the country’s presidential election, provides Orban with backing against EU efforts to toughen financial sanctions over serial abuses of the rule of law in Hungary.
British Prime Minister Keir Starmer’s crushing victory over a Conservative Party that lurched to the nationalist right after Britain’s vote to leave the EU showed that populist nationalism can be defeated when voters realize it has failed to deliver on their expectations and left them worse off.
However, the recent outburst of violent, anti-immigrant extreme-right riots highlights how a radical fringe, mobilized on social media, can cause political havoc even if its voice in parliament is marginal.
The next big test of Europe’s firewalls would come in Germany, when three eastern states hold elections from next month that are being watched as a dress rehearsal for next year’s federal election. Despite a series of scandals that led to it being ostracized even by other nationalist parties in the European parliament, the extreme-right Alternative fur Deutschland (AfD) is leading in opinion polls in all three states, while the recently created pro-Russian, left-populist Sahra Wagenknecht alliance is credited with up to 20 percent. Mainstream parties might not win enough seats together to form viable coalitions in any of those states.
Of all the events that could change the political dynamics in Europe, the US presidential election is by far the most potent. A comeback for a vengeful Trump would embolden and legitimize European nationalists and populists. Think of the smile on the face of the Reform UK leader Nigel Farage or the red-carpet welcome in Budapest for Orban’s best buddy.
If Harris triumphs, leading an administration embodying diversity, feminism and a strong commitment to the rule of law, it could help strengthen the firewall across Europe. However, barriers to keep the extreme right out of power would only work in the long run if the mainstream parties are able to address the issues with the cost of living, affordable housing and affordable energy that have driven so many voters into the arms of populists on both sides of the Atlantic.
Paul Taylor is a senior visiting fellow at the European Policy Centre.
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers
Gogoro Inc was once a rising star and a would-be unicorn in the years prior to its debut on the NASDAQ in 2022, as its environmentally friendly technology and stylish design attracted local young people. The electric scooter and battery swapping services provider is bracing for a major personnel shakeup following the abrupt resignation on Friday of founding chairman Horace Luke (陸學森) as chief executive officer. Luke’s departure indicates that Gogoro is sinking into the trough of unicorn disillusionment, with the company grappling with poor financial performance amid a slowdown in demand at home and setbacks in overseas expansions. About 95
RSS