The Financial Supervisory Commission (FSC) last week announced that it would finalize regulations on the listing of active exchange-traded funds (ETFs) in Taiwan by the end of this year, with the nation’s first active ETF expected to debut next year and the market estimated to reach NT$200 billion (US$6.1 billion) by 2026.
Active ETFs invest in a portfolio of securities selected by fund managers for specific purposes, unlike traditional or passive ETFs, which track particular indices or sectors. Fund managers can adjust the constituent securities based on their view of market trends. Similar to mutual funds, ETFs are designed to help investors with limited capital to allocate assets and diversify risks.
The regulator’s plans for active ETFs, along with passive multi-asset ETFs, would make the local market’s ETF offerings more complete and give investors more options. It also represents a new opportunity for global asset managers to enter the market, which has been running red-hot lately. As of the end of last month, Taiwan’s ETFs had total assets of NT$5.29 trillion, the third-largest in Asia, and accounted for 62.95 percent of the nation’s overall onshore funds, FSC data showed.
The easing of regulations is part of the commission’s efforts to develop Taiwan into an asset management center in Asia. Since taking office in late May, FSC Chairman Peng Jin-lung (彭金隆) has shown ambitions of expanding Taiwan’s financial industry and enhancing the industry’s global competitiveness. He is keen on collecting industry players’ views, and is willing to promote new policies and relax regulations. Consequently, the financial industry has shown optimism and momentum rarely seen in many years.
The commission — which is celebrating its 20th anniversary this year — has faced seemingly ceaseless complaints from the industry over the years about its policy focus, which is more on supervision and risk control, and less on industrial development and investment return. As a result, the financial industry’s ability to innovate has been restrained by strict regulations, while the gap with foreign peers continued to widen. The FSC has just a 1.5-star rating from reviews on Google Maps, placing it at the bottom among government agencies.
In the past few weeks, Peng said the commission intended to work with the industry to expand its output value, which accounted for nearly 10 percent of Taiwan’s GDP before 2000, but fell in the years that followed due to the rapid growth of the technology industry. The ratio plummeted to 4.15 percent after the global financial crisis in 2008-2009, before rebounding to about 6.5 percent on average in the past 10 years.
The FSC chairman has also discussed his strategies for developing financial technology and promoting virtual asset management. He said the regulator would announce plans later this month about promoting Taiwan as one of the asset management centers in Asia with its unique characteristics. Developing an asset management center was one of President William Lai’s (賴清德) major policy proposals during his election campaign last year. It aims to keep the wealth of local people onshore, while attracting more foreign funds to invest in industries in Taiwan.
Clearly, Peng is gearing up for a new page in the local financial industry. However, challenges remain, as the commission is tasked with safeguarding the nation’s financial stability while the industry wants to introduce more products with fewer restrictions. Finding a sweet spot in managing financial risks and rewards is still the same problem facing the commission. If it aims to bring new momentum to the financial industry, it should not solely focus on supervision, but also seek to facilitate innovation and development.
In recent weeks, Taiwan has witnessed a surge of public anxiety over the possible introduction of Indian migrant workers. What began as a policy signal from the Ministry of Labor quickly escalated into a broader controversy. Petitions gathered thousands of signatures within days, political figures issued strong warnings, and social media became saturated with concerns about public safety and social stability. At first glance, this appears to be a straightforward policy question: Should Taiwan introduce Indian migrant workers or not? However, this framing is misleading. The current debate is not fundamentally about India. It is about Taiwan’s labor system, its
Japan’s imminent easing of arms export rules has sparked strong interest from Warsaw to Manila, Reuters reporting found, as US President Donald Trump wavers on security commitments to allies, and the wars in Iran and Ukraine strain US weapons supplies. Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi’s ruling party approved the changes this week as she tries to invigorate the pacifist country’s military industrial base. Her government would formally adopt the new rules as soon as this month, three Japanese government officials told Reuters. Despite largely isolating itself from global arms markets since World War II, Japan spends enough on its own
On March 31, the South Korean Ministry of Foreign Affairs released declassified diplomatic records from 1995 that drew wide domestic media attention. One revelation stood out: North Korea had once raised the possibility of diplomatic relations with Taiwan. In a meeting with visiting Chinese officials in May 1995, as then-Chinese president Jiang Zemin (江澤民) prepared for a visit to South Korea, North Korean officials objected to Beijing’s growing ties with Seoul and raised Taiwan directly. According to the newly released records, North Korean officials asked why Pyongyang should refrain from developing relations with Taiwan while China and South Korea were expanding high-level
Minister of Labor Hung Sun-han (洪申翰) on April 9 said that the first group of Indian workers could arrive as early as this year as part of a memorandum of understanding (MOU) between the Taipei Economic and Cultural Center in India and the India Taipei Association. Signed in February 2024, the MOU stipulates that Taipei would decide the number of migrant workers and which industries would employ them, while New Delhi would manage recruitment and training. Employment would be governed by the laws of both countries. Months after its signing, the two sides agreed that 1,000 migrant workers from India would
RSS