For a long time, the air force’s battle plan has been to use segments of the nation’s freeways as contingency runways for its military aircraft in the event of an invasion and the Chinese People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) destroy or damage the nation’s runways.
Currently, the distribution of Taiwan’s runways is mainly concentrated in the western part of the country — including the freeway sections in Changhua County’s Huatan (花壇), Chiayi County’s Minsyong (民雄), Tainan’s Madou (麻豆) and Rende (仁德), and Pingtung County’s Jiadong (佳冬). The first four are all on freeways, while the Jiadong section is on Provincial Highway 1.
However, in recent years, the PLA Navy and Air Force have increased their range and capabilities with the addition of fighters that can fly longer distances, and the commissioning of air refueling tankers and aircraft carriers. As a result, the frequency of various types of PLA aircraft flying around southeastern and eastern Taiwan has increased.
In the past, Hualien County’s Jiashan (佳山) airbase and Taitung County’s Chihang (志航) airbase in eastern Taiwan were regarded as the air force’s final resort from which to counterattack, because of their underground caves and underpass networks.
Today, the security of the Jiashan and Chihang airbases is threatened by the frequent PLA flights near Taiwan. A practical policy response to meet these threats is for the air force to establish an additional runway in eastern Taiwan, so as to diversify the risk fighters would face in taking off and landing there.
From the perspective of national security and air defense, I support the air force building an additional runway in eastern Taiwan. Perhaps those against it would argue that Taiwan is already within the range of PLA rockets and cruise missiles, would another runway not also be subject to the PLA’s firepower?
This argument is not entirely wrong. However, from the perspective of defense, the more new runways and arms storage the nation builds, the more it would increase the PLA’s cost of attacking Taiwan. In other words, from the perspective of the defense, in order to disperse the PLA’s ballistic missile attacks, it is necessary for the air force to build an additional runway in eastern Taiwan.
As for the highly urbanized western part of Taiwan, there is almost no room to add another runway. Since the eastern part of Taiwan is less developed than the western part, and the former is relatively sparsely populated, the addition of a runway in eastern Taiwan is not only a necessity, but also a much better option for the “Taiwan-Pescadores defense operation.”
Residents of eastern Taiwan, rather than opposing the construction of an additional runway, should consider how a new runway in the region would help the air force’s fighter jets evacuate to stay in the fight, which would strengthen the nation’s defense.
Ray Song is a doctoral student at Tamkang University’s Graduate Institute of International Affairs and Strategic Studies.
Translated by Eddy Chang
US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) were born under the sign of Gemini. Geminis are known for their intelligence, creativity, adaptability and flexibility. It is unlikely, then, that the trade conflict between the US and China would escalate into a catastrophic collision. It is more probable that both sides would seek a way to de-escalate, paving the way for a Trump-Xi summit that allows the global economy some breathing room. Practically speaking, China and the US have vulnerabilities, and a prolonged trade war would be damaging for both. In the US, the electoral system means that public opinion
They did it again. For the whole world to see: an image of a Taiwan flag crushed by an industrial press, and the horrifying warning that “it’s closer than you think.” All with the seal of authenticity that only a reputable international media outlet can give. The Economist turned what looks like a pastiche of a poster for a grim horror movie into a truth everyone can digest, accept, and use to support exactly the opinion China wants you to have: It is over and done, Taiwan is doomed. Four years after inaccurately naming Taiwan the most dangerous place on
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
Wherever one looks, the United States is ceding ground to China. From foreign aid to foreign trade, and from reorganizations to organizational guidance, the Trump administration has embarked on a stunning effort to hobble itself in grappling with what his own secretary of state calls “the most potent and dangerous near-peer adversary this nation has ever confronted.” The problems start at the Department of State. Secretary of State Marco Rubio has asserted that “it’s not normal for the world to simply have a unipolar power” and that the world has returned to multipolarity, with “multi-great powers in different parts of the
RSS