A quick quiz for you: Define “the elite.” Perhaps you answered with something along the lines of “people with superior abilities”? Or maybe you defined it as “the wealthiest and most powerful people in the world”? Neither of those is correct. Nope, “the elite” is now a derogatory term used by politicians to mean anyone who disagrees with them. It is the defining political insult of our time.
Former US president Donald Trump started this trend. He owns a multimillion-dollar Manhattan penthouse dripping with gold, but, starting around 2015, he has carefully distanced himself from evil media and political elites. The idea that he is not included in the “elite” is so laughable that sometimes he is even confused himself.
At one point in 2018 he told a crowd in Minnesota: “You ever notice they always call the other side ‘the elite’? The elite! Why are they elite? I have a much better apartment than they do... I’m richer than they are.”
That slip-up aside, “the elite” has become a handy shorthand for conservatives who want to shut down debate; a useful way for powerful insiders to position themselves as victimized outsiders.
This year, for example, back when she was running for the Republican nomination, Nikki Haley said that people who were calling for her to drop out of the race were “political elites.”
When you do not have a coherent argument, you can just use the E-word.
US President Joe Biden has cottoned on to this.
On Monday, the embattled president called into MSNBC’s Morning Joe and railed against “the elites” who are urging him to stand down after his disastrous debate performance.
Want to know what he did after he announced he is “so frustrated by the elites”? He hopped on a call with his donors. You know, the ones with mansions in the Hamptons and millions of dollars to give to politicians. The non-elites.
One of Biden’s biggest talking points is the fact that he is not Trump. Biden likes to go on about how Trump is a liar with the “morals of an alley cat.” Which is true. However, Biden, now backed into a corner and yelling about elites, is starting to sound very Trumpian indeed.
Arwa Mahdawi is a Guardian columnist.
In a meeting with Haitian Minister of Foreign Affairs Jean-Victor Harvel Jean-Baptiste on Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) vowed to continue providing aid to Haiti. Taiwan supports Haiti with development in areas such as agriculture, healthcare and education through initiatives run by the Taiwan International Cooperation and Development Fund (ICDF). The nation it has established itself as a responsible, peaceful and innovative actor committed to global cooperation, Jean-Baptiste said. Testimonies such as this give Taiwan a voice in the global community, where it often goes unheard. Taiwan’s reception in Haiti also contrasts with how China has been perceived in countries in the region
On April 13, I stood in Nanan (南安), a Bunun village in southern Hualien County’s Jhuosi Township (卓溪), absorbing lessons from elders who spoke of the forest not as backdrop, but as living presence — relational, sacred and full of spirit. I was there with fellow international students from National Dong Hwa University (NDHU) participating in a field trip that would become one of the most powerful educational experiences of my life. Ten days later, a news report in the Taipei Times shattered the spell: “Formosan black bear shot and euthanized in Hualien” (April 23, page 2). A tagged bear, previously released
The world has become less predictable, less rules-based, and more shaped by the impulses of strongmen and short-term dealmaking. Nowhere is this more consequential than in East Asia, where the fate of democratic Taiwan hinges on how global powers manage — or mismanage — tensions with an increasingly assertive China. The return of Donald Trump to the White House has deepened the global uncertainty, with his erratic, highly personalized foreign-policy approach unsettling allies and adversaries alike. Trump appears to treat foreign policy like a reality show. Yet, paradoxically, the global unpredictability may offer Taiwan unexpected deterrence. For China, the risk of provoking the
Starting this month, young women in Denmark would be subject to conscription on the same terms as men. All Danes, regardless of gender, would be required to register for military assessment, and eligible individuals would be selected through a lottery-based draft. In addition, service time would be increased to 11 months, and conscript numbers would grow to meet national defense targets. Denmark is not alone. In the past few years, several European countries, most notably Sweden and Norway, have adopted gender-neutral conscription systems. Latvia is moving in the same direction. The war in Ukraine has accelerated this trend. Faced with the
RSS