In late May, as the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) and the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) were expanding legislative power, China conducted military drills around Taiwan again. On the surface, it seems as if the saber-rattling was directed at President William Lai (賴清德) to punish him for his inauguration.
However, it was the first time China mobilized its coast guard in an attempt to expand jurisdiction and law enforcement over the Taiwan Strait, thus “domesticating” the waterway.
China is relentlessly expanding its “gray zone” war tactics.
Several days ago, the China Coast Guard boarded and impounded a Taiwanese fishing boat registered in Penghu County, arresting the crew, even though the boat was within Taiwanese waters northeast of Kinmen County. Despite a swift response by the Coast Guard Administration, it was too late. The Chinese had already whisked the crew away to China.
While this was unfolding, KMT Legislator Chen Hsueh-sheng (陳雪生) proposed an “outlying islands supply regulations” bill, which was passed by the two opposition parties.
Not only would these regulations permit Taiwan’s outlying islands to ignore the restrictions of the Government Procurement Act (政府採購法), state-to-state regulations and national security clauses, it would allow Chinese firms to flood Taiwan with “related” “operational workers” and “machinery,” completely opening the door to China.
This would not only allow outlying islands to legally become Taiwanese territories where China’s “one country, two systems” plan is implemented, but could also become a springboard for large-scale Chinese infiltration of Taiwan.
Kinmen and Lienchiang counties are areas that strongly support the KMT. If they remove restrictions, the two county councils would not hesitate to bring in Chinese firms. China could provide massive support to its own firms by using extremely low pricing or even “free” investment. It could harness these methods to “show its goodwill,” in reality buying people off.
It has long had plans to turn Kinmen and Lienchiang into testing grounds and a showcase for implementation of its “one country, two systems” plans.
China used much the same tactics in Hong Kong, ultimately forcing construction in the territory to be almost entirely dominated by Chinese factories and firms. Hong Kong’s government was a puppet for Beijing, incessantly implementing and buying into Chinese interests, such as a high-speed railway to China, the Hong Kong-Zhuhai-Macau Bridge, bridges from the mainland into the territory and even reservoirs.
These, as well as the Lantau Tomorrow Vision development plan, a massive land reclamation project, and other unnecessary and astronomically expensive white elephants gave all the benefits to Chinese companies while gutting Hong Kong’s pocketbook.
It created a situation in which bad money forced out good money, and suppressed the competitive space for far better, less shady, non-Chinese contracting firms.
Hong Kong ended up with a Chinese financial monopoly, affecting entire industry supply chains, upstream and downstream, including factories, foundries and quarries producing cement, stone, steel, glass and other building materials. The practice was widely expanded, generating endless trouble.
The KMT-TPP bills expanding the legislature’s powers is merely an appetizer to what happened in Hong Kong. The white and blue camps’ bills might allow Chinese materials to flood into Taiwan, which would just be the beginning.
Recalling legislators responsible might be the only way Taiwan can rebuild its defenses.
Hong Tsun-ming is a policy specialist in the Taiwan Statebuilding Party.
Translated by Tim Smith
Jan. 1 marks a decade since China repealed its one-child policy. Just 10 days before, Peng Peiyun (彭珮雲), who long oversaw the often-brutal enforcement of China’s family-planning rules, died at the age of 96, having never been held accountable for her actions. Obituaries praised Peng for being “reform-minded,” even though, in practice, she only perpetuated an utterly inhumane policy, whose consequences have barely begun to materialize. It was Vice Premier Chen Muhua (陳慕華) who first proposed the one-child policy in 1979, with the endorsement of China’s then-top leaders, Chen Yun (陳雲) and Deng Xiaoping (鄧小平), as a means of avoiding the
The immediate response in Taiwan to the extraction of Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro by the US over the weekend was to say that it was an example of violence by a major power against a smaller nation and that, as such, it gave Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) carte blanche to invade Taiwan. That assessment is vastly oversimplistic and, on more sober reflection, likely incorrect. Generally speaking, there are three basic interpretations from commentators in Taiwan. The first is that the US is no longer interested in what is happening beyond its own backyard, and no longer preoccupied with regions in other
A recent piece of international news has drawn surprisingly little attention, yet it deserves far closer scrutiny. German industrial heavyweight Siemens Mobility has reportedly outmaneuvered long-entrenched Chinese competitors in Southeast Asian infrastructure to secure a strategic partnership with Vietnam’s largest private conglomerate, Vingroup. The agreement positions Siemens to participate in the construction of a high-speed rail link between Hanoi and Ha Long Bay. German media were blunt in their assessment: This was not merely a commercial win, but has symbolic significance in “reshaping geopolitical influence.” At first glance, this might look like a routine outcome of corporate bidding. However, placed in
The last foreign delegation Nicolas Maduro met before he went to bed Friday night (January 2) was led by China’s top Latin America diplomat. “I had a pleasant meeting with Qiu Xiaoqi (邱小琪), Special Envoy of President Xi Jinping (習近平),” Venezuela’s soon-to-be ex-president tweeted on Telegram, “and we reaffirmed our commitment to the strategic relationship that is progressing and strengthening in various areas for building a multipolar world of development and peace.” Judging by how minutely the Central Intelligence Agency was monitoring Maduro’s every move on Friday, President Trump himself was certainly aware of Maduro’s felicitations to his Chinese guest. Just