While the local media have long been the target of China’s “united front” propaganda, YouTubers and entertainers recently revealed that Beijing is paying Taiwanese content creators to produce content that are favorable to China.
YouTuber Potter King (波特王) on June 12 shared a post on Threads saying that the Cross-Strait Youth Exchange Association has invited at least 10 Taiwanese YouTubers to visit China, offering incentives such as free tickets and accommodation, to attend the so-called “Cross-strait Youth Culture Month” event to produce videos that paint China’s image and quality of life in a positive light.
This could be part of Beijing’s “united front” tactics, Potter King said. Other Taiwanese entertainers, including singer R.Chord (謝和弦) and actress Alexis Ho (何以奇), said they had also received invitation letters from China to participate in pro-Beijing activities.
One letter showed a Chinese film and television company based in Beijing attempting to recruit Taiwanese entertainers to post messages promoting cross-strait unification, and offering opportunities to earn an annual income of more than NT$10 million (US$307,882).
Letters also showed the Chinese firm’s attempts to recruit thousands of Taiwanese celebrities to organize a political party to participate in next year’s local elections.
Taiwan surely welcomes the cross-strait interactions that based on mutual respects and mutual benefits. However, taking advantage of the nation’s freedom of speech, China has long started cognitive warfare tactics to shape Taiwanese media and public opinion.
Chinese officials and state-controlled private sectors have promoted “united front” campaigns through measures such as sponsoring Taiwanese media programs, buying advertisements and news placements.
In recent years, Beijing has spent even greater resources to get Taiwanese politicians and opinion leaders from all walks of life to visit China and speak positively about it, in an attempt to undermine national identity and unity in Taiwan.
Targeting young Taiwanese, whose vote plays a crucial role in elections and policy development, China has launched massive “united front” tactics in the culture and entertainment sphere, attempting to garner support from entertainers and Internet influencers that could affect young people’s political views.
Beijing frequently uses a “carrot and stick” strategy to manipulate public opinion. It offers benefits to entertainers who push its propaganda while coercing them into promoting its national identity. An example is the controversial case of Taiwanese singer Chou Tzu-yu (周子瑜), who in 2016 was forced to apologize in a YouTube video for holding up a Taiwanese flag on a South Korean TV show.
Amis singer Panai Kusui on Saturday said in her speech after winning Best Taiwanese Album at the Golden Melody Awards ceremony that it was the 35th anniversary of the awards and that “the Tiananmen Square Massacre is also 35 years old, let’s not forget.”
Unsurprisingly, Panai’s remarks, music and related discussions were removed from the Chinese Internet.
A few influencers and Taiwanese netizens said Panai “shouldn’t spoil the atmosphere of a cultural event with political comments” and “cultural issues shouldn’t mix with politics,” showing that China’s “united front” tactics might be paying off.
“Beijing’s action further underscore the precious freedom in Taiwan. Taiwan’s democracy is a process that all of us need to cherish,” Panai said in response to her critics.
Taiwanese should cherish and protect what they have. The government should also provide more support and resources to cultivate figures and talents in various fields so they can help defend Taiwanese sovereignty and demonstrate democratic freedom through their works.
Jan. 1 marks a decade since China repealed its one-child policy. Just 10 days before, Peng Peiyun (彭珮雲), who long oversaw the often-brutal enforcement of China’s family-planning rules, died at the age of 96, having never been held accountable for her actions. Obituaries praised Peng for being “reform-minded,” even though, in practice, she only perpetuated an utterly inhumane policy, whose consequences have barely begun to materialize. It was Vice Premier Chen Muhua (陳慕華) who first proposed the one-child policy in 1979, with the endorsement of China’s then-top leaders, Chen Yun (陳雲) and Deng Xiaoping (鄧小平), as a means of avoiding the
The last foreign delegation Nicolas Maduro met before he went to bed Friday night (January 2) was led by China’s top Latin America diplomat. “I had a pleasant meeting with Qiu Xiaoqi (邱小琪), Special Envoy of President Xi Jinping (習近平),” Venezuela’s soon-to-be ex-president tweeted on Telegram, “and we reaffirmed our commitment to the strategic relationship that is progressing and strengthening in various areas for building a multipolar world of development and peace.” Judging by how minutely the Central Intelligence Agency was monitoring Maduro’s every move on Friday, President Trump himself was certainly aware of Maduro’s felicitations to his Chinese guest. Just
A recent piece of international news has drawn surprisingly little attention, yet it deserves far closer scrutiny. German industrial heavyweight Siemens Mobility has reportedly outmaneuvered long-entrenched Chinese competitors in Southeast Asian infrastructure to secure a strategic partnership with Vietnam’s largest private conglomerate, Vingroup. The agreement positions Siemens to participate in the construction of a high-speed rail link between Hanoi and Ha Long Bay. German media were blunt in their assessment: This was not merely a commercial win, but has symbolic significance in “reshaping geopolitical influence.” At first glance, this might look like a routine outcome of corporate bidding. However, placed in
China often describes itself as the natural leader of the global south: a power that respects sovereignty, rejects coercion and offers developing countries an alternative to Western pressure. For years, Venezuela was held up — implicitly and sometimes explicitly — as proof that this model worked. Today, Venezuela is exposing the limits of that claim. Beijing’s response to the latest crisis in Venezuela has been striking not only for its content, but for its tone. Chinese officials have abandoned their usual restrained diplomatic phrasing and adopted language that is unusually direct by Beijing’s standards. The Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs described the