The downsides of nuclear
Pegatron CEO Tong Tzu-hsien (童子賢) has been making a lot of statements in support of nuclear power. However, Taiwan’s power infrastructure has changed over the years: Renewable energy’s overall output has surpassed that of nuclear power.
Nuclear power plants account for only 6 percent of the nation’s electricity output. The proportion of electricity generated by renewable sources, including solar, wind, hydroelectricity, biomass and thermal power, is increasing every year. Official figures project that renewable energy sources would contribute 20 percent next year.
Artificial intelligence technologies — large-scale deep learning models and training processes in particular — demand massive computing power. This would lead to high electricity consumption, meaning that the global need for renewable energy would have to increase in response. Foreign-owned factories would need OEMs to gradually increase the usage rate of renewables each year. This shows us that the continued development of nuclear power in Taiwan is increasingly ill-suited.
Taiwan is densely populated and is located on the seismically active Pacific Rim. This carries massive risk for nuclear power use. Spent fuel rod handling and an expensive overhead, as well as nuclear disaster evacuation planning, all require prudent consideration. None of these factors are being fully thought out, but would end up being the key to deciding nuclear power feasibility.
Meanwhile, the Russia-Ukraine war has been going on for more than two years. The Russian military attacked critical infrastructure such as nuclear power plants to weaken Ukraine, leading to suspicions of intentionally wanting to create a nuclear disaster.
Add to this rapid global energy transition, which is spurring the prioritization of renewable energy and dispersed electric grids everywhere, increasing flexibility. Chinese drones have intruded into the airspace around Taiwan’s outlying islands. The government’s plan is to issue drone-jamming guns to personnel to protect the nuclear power plants and other national first-tier critical infrastructure. Nuclear power facilities could be threatened in a Chinese escalation of aggression against Taiwan, which is a huge reminder that Taiwan cannot bear the aftermath of a nuclear disaster.
Tong is only looking at the benefits of nuclear power, but he is ignoring the pitfalls and downsides of its use in the nation. The recent discovery of a South Korean nuclear power plant leaking wastewater is another warning sign. Power plant reboots or service-life extensions are not simply a matter of economic livelihood, but also of national security. Tong’s stance and the white and blue camps’ promotion of an amendment to the Nuclear Reactor Facilities Regulation Act (核子反應器設施管制法) are one and the same, attempting to solve the problem of extended servicing, but nuclear power plant service life extension is not at all the best solution. If we continue to push the nuclear issue, we would only be worrying the public. The lack of a truly feasible improvement plan only results in the loss of public trust.
Tu Hsin-lung
Tainan
Apart from the first arms sales approval for Taiwan since US President Donald Trump took office, last month also witnessed another milestone for Taiwan-US relations. Trump signed the Taiwan Assurance Implementation Act into law on Tuesday. Its passing without objection in the US Senate underscores how bipartisan US support for Taiwan has evolved. The new law would further help normalize exchanges between Taiwanese and US government officials. We have already seen a flurry of visits to Washington earlier this summer, not only with Minister of Foreign Affairs Lin Chia-lung (林佳龍), but also delegations led by National Security Council Secretary-General Joseph Wu
When the towers of Wang Fuk Court turned into a seven-building inferno on Wednesday last week, killing 128 people, including a firefighter, Hong Kong officials promised investigations, pledged to review regulations and within hours issued a plan to replace bamboo scaffolding with steel. It sounded decisive. It was not. The gestures are about political optics, not accountability. The tragedy was not caused by bamboo or by outdated laws. Flame-retardant netting is already required. Under Hong Kong’s Mandatory Building Inspection Scheme — which requires buildings more than 30 years old to undergo inspection every decade and compulsory repairs — the framework for
In A phone call between US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平), Xi is reported to have stated that in his view, “Taiwan’s return to China” is to be considered an integral part of the post-World War II international order. Never mind that China under Xi has been trying to undermine the liberal post-war international order by setting up alternative organizations and schemes that are detrimental to freedom and democracy around the world. Its own repression of Tibet, Xinjiang and Hong Kong are vivid examples. The “return to China” is the biggest misnomer: Taiwan has never ever been part
President William Lai (賴清德) on Wednesday last week announced a plan to invest an additional NT$1.25 trillion (US$39.8 billion) in military spending to procure advanced defense systems over the next eight years, and outlined two major plans and concrete steps to defend democratic Taiwan in the face of China’s intensifying threat. While Lai’s plans for boosting the country’s national security have been praised by many US lawmakers, former defense officials, academics and the American Institute in Taiwan, the US’ de facto embassy in Taiwan, they were not equally welcomed by all Taiwanese, particularly among the opposition parties. Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman
RSS