There are two issues that deserve our full attention: the rise in health insurance adjustments and the sorrow-filled sagas of long-term care. The two are seemingly unrelated, but “overtreatment” is causing both of these issues. Health insurance is an internal cost. Long-term care is an external cost. If we do not treat the root cause, we are just drawing out the issue by targeting smaller issues and avoiding hard discussions, which ultimately puts immense pressure on society.
On Monday last week, a meeting was held to discuss one patient’s treatment. An oncologist spoke first: “I’ve discovered that the patient does not have terminal cancer. Death will be caused by failure in the patient’s other organs.” The nephrologist immediately chimed in: “The patient’s kidneys are failing. We should treat them with dialysis. The patient’s condition is not terminal.” The pulmonologist spoke up then: “The patient’s lungs are functioning. There is no way this can be a terminal patient.” The neurologist then responded: “The patient is in a coma. We have to hook the patient up to a feeding tube and oxygen. The patient could live forever.”
On that Wednesday, during visitation time in the pulmonary ward, the family said: “After my father’s stroke, he has not been thinking clearly. He has already been on life support for a year. Can we pull the plug? Can he pass away naturally?” The doctor responded: “This will cause harm to the patient. There are many other patients who have been here for two or more years.”
Friday afternoon, the main doctor for the hospice care ward was making the rounds. The family asked: “Our mother’s 92 years old. She has hypertension, diabetes and dementia, and her body is withering away. She has been on a feeding tube for six years. She has been in this ward twice. If we took her feeding tube out, would she pass away?” Doctor: “We can’t do that. If you want to pull the plug, you will have to take her home and do it. It will be on you.”
The above scenarios are daily occurrences at many hospitals. Life-sustaining medical treatment is abused, and there is a prevalence of medical overtreatment. Hospital overheads are rising. So, the Ministry of Health and Welfare’s budget for next year is estimated to exceed NT$900 billion (US$27.6 billion) for the first time, which would lead to the eventual necessity of raising health insurance costs.
However, compared with the visible internal costs, overtreatment leads to caretaker burdens due to the patients’ long-term loss of abilities. The invisible external costs are much more frightening.
In July last year, I received a letter. Its contents, in brief, are as follows:
“My mother is 92 years old. When she was 79, she began showing signs of cognitive loss. Eight years ago, her disability was diagnosed as severe dementia. I am unable to be at home all day to care for her, so we sent her to live in a nursing home. Later, because of surgery for appendicitis, she was hooked up to oxygen and a feeding tube. Her condition was sometimes urgent, and we’d have to send her to the emergency room or to hospice care. However, she would eventually end up back at the nursing home. We have repeated this process over 10 times at this point. I hope that my mother can leave all this pain and suffering behind. I would be willing to be sent to hell for any supposed sin of not showing proper filial piety if my actions would relieve her suffering.”
When I finished reading the letter, I had a heavy heart. These published sagas of long-term care are just the tip of the iceberg. Many more families stare down a seemingly endless tunnel. They silently accept the pressure and burden of long-term care for their loved ones. Some stoically let everything roll right off their shoulders. Some crumble and collapse in on themselves from it all. Some completely topple over.
There is a big difference between treating one’s parents with filial piety and reverence, and taking care of them until the end. However, if one’s parent’s life is extended, then vested interests could be cashing in on it. External costs are borne by families, and this is highly unethical.
I admitted the letter writer’s mother to hospital for care. After completing legal procedures and fully video-recording and tape recording the entire process as evidence, I took out the patient’s feeding tube, allowing them to eat on their own. The patient passed away six days later.
Wu Yu-cheng is a doctor.
Translated by Tim Smith
When US budget carrier Southwest Airlines last week announced a new partnership with China Airlines, Southwest’s social media were filled with comments from travelers excited by the new opportunity to visit China. Of course, China Airlines is not based in China, but in Taiwan, and the new partnership connects Taiwan Taoyuan International Airport with 30 cities across the US. At a time when China is increasing efforts on all fronts to falsely label Taiwan as “China” in all arenas, Taiwan does itself no favors by having its flagship carrier named China Airlines. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs is eager to jump at
The muting of the line “I’m from Taiwan” (我台灣來欸), sung in Hoklo (commonly known as Taiwanese), during a performance at the closing ceremony of the World Masters Games in New Taipei City on May 31 has sparked a public outcry. The lyric from the well-known song All Eyes on Me (世界都看見) — originally written and performed by Taiwanese hip-hop group Nine One One (玖壹壹) — was muted twice, while the subtitles on the screen showed an alternate line, “we come here together” (阮作伙來欸), which was not sung. The song, performed at the ceremony by a cheerleading group, was the theme
Secretary of State Marco Rubio raised eyebrows recently when he declared the era of American unipolarity over. He described America’s unrivaled dominance of the international system as an anomaly that was created by the collapse of the Soviet Union at the end of the Cold War. Now, he observed, the United States was returning to a more multipolar world where there are great powers in different parts of the planet. He pointed to China and Russia, as well as “rogue states like Iran and North Korea” as examples of countries the United States must contend with. This all begs the question:
In China, competition is fierce, and in many cases suppliers do not get paid on time. Rather than improving, the situation appears to be deteriorating. BYD Co, the world’s largest electric vehicle manufacturer by production volume, has gained notoriety for its harsh treatment of suppliers, raising concerns about the long-term sustainability. The case also highlights the decline of China’s business environment, and the growing risk of a cascading wave of corporate failures. BYD generally does not follow China’s Negotiable Instruments Law when settling payments with suppliers. Instead the company has created its own proprietary supply chain finance system called the “D-chain,” through which
RSS