Amid a daily increase in threats from climate change, countries are adopting proactive measures to counter this crisis.
On June 19, President William Lai (賴清德) announced that the Presidential Office would establish a National Climate Change Response Committee, and Minister of Environment Peng Chi-ming (彭啟明) also announced the establishment of the Green Policy Office to promote the planning and implementation of policies for tackling climate change and transitioning to zero carbon emissions. This series of measures shows Taiwan’s high degree of emphasis and determination being placed on climate change issues.
In dealing with climate change, we could learn a great deal from nature. Designs that emulate or take inspiration from nature are an effective means for solving humanity’s problems. The ancient Chinese Taoist philosopher Lao Tzu (老子) is quoted in the Tao Te Ching (道德經) as saying: “Man follows the laws of earth, earth follows the laws of heaven, heaven follows the laws of the Way, and the Way follows the laws of nature.”
This way of humanity fine-tuning itself to align with nature’s wisdom could also inspire enterprises in how they transition to zero carbon emissions, not only reducing waste, but also elevating the efficiency of resource use.
The textile industry is a traditionally high-energy-consumption industry. Its transition to zero carbon emissions is particularly urgent.
Former Everest Textile Co president Roger Yeh (葉清來) recently shared how the textile industry could, through studying nature, renew its thinking and design a production flow that realizes energy-saving and carbon-reduction goals. Since the industry’s supply chains are long and complicated — from fiber sourcing to the last stages of clothing production — each link along the chain must reduce its negative environmental impacts and save energy and resources.
As such, Everest in 2007 began integrating a sustainable development model, adopting the “7R” strategy to raise the efficiency and productivity of its energy and resources. The “r’s” in “7R” stand for “rethink,” “redesign,” “reduce,” “reuse,” “repair,” “recycle” and “recovery.”
Not only does this model expand the traditional 3R model of “reduce,” “reuse” and “recycle,” it goes further in studying nature by promoting the four cyclical models of a low-carbon economy which are an “ecological design cycle,” “resource cycle,” the “industrial waste cycle” and the “carbon cycle.” The goal is to advance toward carbon neutrality by 2050.
By putting this all into practice, Everest uses natural cooling techniques such as planting trees and using cooling water curtains, making its factory environments more comfortable.
At the same time, using stack effect principles, it has cleverly implemented an innovative air flow system within its factories, reducing the need for air-conditioning. These changes find their roots in the observation and adoption of what is studied from the great outdoors.
Everest’s experience with green transition shows us that learning from nature is feasible and highly effective. For example, it reuses factory waste such as coal slag and sludge by turning them into cement and cinder blocks. This solves the issue of waste products and could also create economic value.
This kind of “waste to wealth” concept fulfills realizing the regenerative principles of natural cycles, and moreover could help in seeking a balance between economies, societies and the environment, achieving a truly green transition and sustainable development.
Liao Ming-hui is an assistant researcher at the Chung-Hua Institution for Economic Research.
Translated by Tim Smith
In the event of a war with China, Taiwan has some surprisingly tough defenses that could make it as difficult to tackle as a porcupine: A shoreline dotted with swamps, rocks and concrete barriers; conscription for all adult men; highways and airports that are built to double as hardened combat facilities. This porcupine has a soft underbelly, though, and the war in Iran is exposing it: energy. About 39,000 ships dock at Taiwan’s ports each year, more than the 30,000 that transit the Strait of Hormuz. About one-fifth of their inbound tonnage is coal, oil, refined fuels and liquefied natural gas (LNG),
To counter the CCP’s escalating threats, Taiwan must build a national consensus and demonstrate the capability and the will to fight. The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) often leans on a seductive mantra to soften its threats, such as “Chinese do not kill Chinese.” The slogan is designed to frame territorial conquest (annexation) as a domestic family matter. A look at the historical ledger reveals a different truth. For the CCP, being labeled “family” has never been a guarantee of safety; it has been the primary prerequisite for state-sanctioned slaughter. From the forced starvation of 150,000 civilians at the Siege of Changchun
The two major opposition parties, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), jointly announced on Tuesday last week that former TPP lawmaker Chang Chi-kai (張啟楷) would be their joint candidate for Chiayi mayor, following polling conducted earlier this month. It is the first case of blue-white (KMT-TPP) cooperation in selecting a joint candidate under an agreement signed by their chairpersons last month. KMT and TPP supporters have blamed their 2024 presidential election loss on failing to decide on a joint candidate, which ended in a dramatic breakdown with participants pointing fingers, calling polls unfair, sobbing and walking
In recent weeks, Taiwan has witnessed a surge of public anxiety over the possible introduction of Indian migrant workers. What began as a policy signal from the Ministry of Labor quickly escalated into a broader controversy. Petitions gathered thousands of signatures within days, political figures issued strong warnings, and social media became saturated with concerns about public safety and social stability. At first glance, this appears to be a straightforward policy question: Should Taiwan introduce Indian migrant workers or not? However, this framing is misleading. The current debate is not fundamentally about India. It is about Taiwan’s labor system, its
RSS