On Friday last week, China released “judicial guidelines on imposing criminal punishments” — including jail terms ranging from three years to life imprisonment and even the death penalty — for “die-hard” supporters of Taiwanese independence.
However, this bullying tactic would only lead to further cross-strait separation that departs from the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) goal of unifying with Taiwan.
The announcement by the Chinese Ministry of Justice and judicial courts lists 22 guidelines for its courts and security bodies to “severely punish Taiwanese independence die-hards for splitting the country and inciting secession, and resolutely defend national sovereignty, unity and territorial integrity.”
The guidelines also outline what China considers crimes worthy of punishment, including promoting Taiwan’s de jure independence, advocating the nation’s entry into international organizations, engaging in official exchanges and military contacts abroad, and conspiring to create “two Chinas” or “one China, one Taiwan,” in the international community.
It also targets attempts to “change Taiwan’s legal status as a part of China,” or “distort or falsify the fact that Taiwan is part of China in the fields of education, culture, history, [and] news media.” More perversely, trials can be held in absentia.
Since China has no jurisdiction over Taiwan, those new guidelines could be used to threat Taiwanese traveling to China. And they are more an act of legal warfare to weaponize its domestic laws to intimidate new president William Lai (賴清德) and pro-Taiwan activists, such as the dozens of politicians and media commentators named on its sanctions list.
Many pro-China people, such as Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) politicians and its members who repeatedly laud the Constitution of the Republic of China (ROC) that insists that “mainland China is part of ROC territory,” could also be punished for insulting the PRC’s sovereignty.
KMT Legislator Weng Hsiao-ling (翁曉玲), who officially asked the minister of national defense to “reclaim mainland China” as part of ROC territory, could be convicted of subversion of the PRC’s power.
Millions of Taiwanese could also be punished for voting in presidential and legislative elections, a process which marks Taiwan as an independent, sovereign entity that is separate from China.
With a growing number of countries’ officials and lawmakers challenging Beijing’s “one China” principle by deepening multilevel ties with Taiwan, and more international voices rejecting China’s mischaracterization of UN Resolution 2758 as saying Taiwan is part of China, the guidelines are intended as legal warfare to push back against support for Taiwan’s independent sovereign status.
They also aim to burnish Beijing’s disinformation that Taiwan is a subordinate part of China, setting the stage for turning Taiwan into another Hong Kong or deploying its secret police worldwide to harass Taiwanese and international like-minded friends.
Beijing might also use them as part of its legal basis for justifying military action against Taiwan.
China’s move has demonstrated its escalating hostility and bullying approach to Taiwan, which would surely lead to further separation and provoke more confrontation across the strait.
In response to the guidelines, Lai said “democracy is not a crime; it’s autocracy that is the real evil.” All Taiwanese and the international community should cooperate to confront and fight such evil hegemonism.
A return to power for former US president Donald Trump would pose grave risks to Taiwan’s security, autonomy and the broader stability of the Indo-Pacific region. The stakes have never been higher as China aggressively escalates its pressure on Taiwan, deploying economic, military and psychological tactics aimed at subjugating the nation under Beijing’s control. The US has long acted as Taiwan’s foremost security partner, a bulwark against Chinese expansionism in the region. However, a second Trump presidency could upend decades of US commitments, introducing unpredictability that could embolden Beijing and severely compromise Taiwan’s position. While president, Trump’s foreign policy reflected a transactional
There appears to be a growing view among leaders and leading thinkers in Taiwan that their words and actions have no influence over how China approaches cross-Strait relations. According to this logic, China’s actions toward Taiwan are guided by China’s unwavering ambition to assert control over Taiwan. Many also believe Beijing’s approach is influenced by China’s domestic politics. As the thinking goes, former President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) made a good faith effort to demonstrate her moderation on cross-Strait issues throughout her tenure. During her 2016 inaugural address, Tsai sent several constructive signals, including by acknowledging the historical fact of interactions and
Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) has prioritized modernizing the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) to rival the US military, with many experts believing he would not act on Taiwan until the PLA is fully prepared to confront US forces. At the Chinese Communist Party’s 20th Party Congress in 2022, Xi emphasized accelerating this modernization, setting 2027 — the PLA’s centennial — as the new target, replacing the previous 2035 goal. US intelligence agencies said that Xi has directed the PLA to be ready for a potential invasion of Taiwan by 2027, although no decision on launching an attack had been made. Whether
HSBC Holdings successfully fought off a breakup campaign by disgruntled Asian investors in recent years. Now, it has announced a restructuring along almost the same east-west lines. The obvious question is why? It says it is designed to create a simpler, more efficient and dynamic company. However, it looks a lot like the bank is also facing up to the political reality of the growing schism between the US and China. A new structure would not dissolve HSBC’s geopolitical challenges, but it could give the bank better options to respond quickly if things worsen. HSBC spent 2022 battling to convince shareholders of