Two weeks ago, the National Health Research Institutes discovered that children with severe enterovirus infections had also been found to have hyperglycemia or high blood sugar.
As such, they inferred that people with enterovirus should avoid eating sugary foods.
Although the research on the prevention of severe symptoms is commendable, the underlying cause has not been fully identified.
Researchers hastily announced that families should not allow their kids to consume sugar while fighting off an enterovirus infection, and that they could be unexpectedly harmed.
For the most part, enterovirus infections present with mild symptoms, and those who are hospitalized can easily be dehydrated due to fever, vomiting, a refusal to eat due to mouth ulcers, electrolyte imbalance or low blood sugar.
The current standard of treatment is for an infected person to stay at home and replenish their electrolytes and fluids.
For example, the WHO recommends drinking electrolytes with a sugar content of 90 millimoles per liter.
The Centers for Disease Control suggests eating pudding or, if at an emergency clinic, to receive an intravenous drip. Both of these recommendations incorporate the ingestion of sugar.
The research team was unclear about its definition of “sweets” or “sweetened foods” when they made their announcement, creating some confusion that has led to inappropriate care by some families of people with mild symptoms, resulting in hypoglycemic shock or severe dehydration.
The reasoning is murky for “non-diabetic hyperglycemia” causing severe enterovirus symptoms.
Studies are leaning toward people with severe symptoms sometimes having excessive secretions of stress hormones such as cortisone, adrenaline and glucagon, which can cause temporary hyperglycemia.
Between hyperglycemia and severe symptoms, how do we determine which is the cause and which is the effect? Conclusions are being drawn at an unclear stage.
Promoting the idea that eating sweet foods leads to severe symptoms is unfortunately resulting in parents feeling uneasy, doctors administering clinical treatments without a factual basis and the inadvertent harming of kids.
Lin Sung-lien is a pediatrician at the Children’s Clinical Center in Keelung.
Translated by Tim Smith
The return of US president-elect Donald Trump to the White House has injected a new wave of anxiety across the Taiwan Strait. For Taiwan, an island whose very survival depends on the delicate and strategic support from the US, Trump’s election victory raises a cascade of questions and fears about what lies ahead. His approach to international relations — grounded in transactional and unpredictable policies — poses unique risks to Taiwan’s stability, economic prosperity and geopolitical standing. Trump’s first term left a complicated legacy in the region. On the one hand, his administration ramped up arms sales to Taiwan and sanctioned
The US election result will significantly impact its foreign policy with global implications. As tensions escalate in the Taiwan Strait and conflicts elsewhere draw attention away from the western Pacific, Taiwan was closely monitoring the election, as many believe that whoever won would confront an increasingly assertive China, especially with speculation over a potential escalation in or around 2027. A second Donald Trump presidency naturally raises questions concerning the future of US policy toward China and Taiwan, with Trump displaying mixed signals as to his position on the cross-strait conflict. US foreign policy would also depend on Trump’s Cabinet and
The Taiwanese have proven to be resilient in the face of disasters and they have resisted continuing attempts to subordinate Taiwan to the People’s Republic of China (PRC). Nonetheless, the Taiwanese can and should do more to become even more resilient and to be better prepared for resistance should the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) try to annex Taiwan. President William Lai (賴清德) argues that the Taiwanese should determine their own fate. This position continues the Democratic Progressive Party’s (DPP) tradition of opposing the CCP’s annexation of Taiwan. Lai challenges the CCP’s narrative by stating that Taiwan is not subordinate to the
Republican candidate and former US president Donald Trump is to be the 47th president of the US after beating his Democratic rival, US Vice President Kamala Harris, in the election on Tuesday. Trump’s thumping victory — winning 295 Electoral College votes against Harris’ 226 as of press time last night, along with the Republicans winning control of the US Senate and possibly the House of Representatives — is a remarkable political comeback from his 2020 defeat to US President Joe Biden, and means Trump has a strong political mandate to implement his agenda. What does Trump’s victory mean for Taiwan, Asia, deterrence