Five decades after electronics gained a toehold in Malaysia and helped drive years of stellar growth, leaders are again putting their faith in chips. Artificial intelligence (AI) and the competition to present as the most friendly destination for investment, stands to give the place a much needed lift. Once seen as a template for developing economies, the country now contends with a slower expansion and fractious politics. The trick would be sorting the AI hype from the substance — and whether Malaysia can avoid some own goals.
Malaysian Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim recently made his pitch. The government promised 25 billion ringgit (US$5.3 billion) to support the semiconductor industry. Anwar nodded to a long-standing challenge, which is the need to graduate from a center for assembly and testing to more lucrative areas such as design.
The premier is also betting that Malaysia, one of the biggest chip exporters to the US, but with a history of cordial ties to China, can be a player in an era when supply chains are increasingly sorted along national security lines.
“I offer our nation as the most neutral and non-aligned location,” he said.
The mania for most things AI, and a couple of pledges from technology icons, is generating good press. An educated workforce, relatively low costs and proximity to Singapore has companies singing Malaysia’s praises in the way they did during the glory days of former Malaysian prime minister Mahathir Mohamad, who ruled with a strong hand, but recognized the need to make life easy for big multinationals.
Microsoft Corp chairman Satya Nadella last month vowed US$2.2 billion to build digital infrastructure. Meanwhile, YTL Power International Bhd became a market darling after it announced a venture with Nvidia Corp for a US$4.3 billion data center in the southern state of Johor.
The enthusiasm for Malaysia led me to recall the history of Penang, an island in the north of the country. On visits there, I was always struck by the reverence for Intel Corp, and its early leaders Gordon Moore and Andrew Grove.
They came to the place when it had a port, fantastic seafood and not a whole lot more, although it did have a state administration eager to promote development.
Intel opened its first assembly and testing business outside the US in 1972, and the place is still a major hub for the company. Chips are now almost everything to Penang, which residents have come to call Silicon Island. Large-scale dredging and land reclamation are underway to add space for more industrial parks.
So, is AI and a new wave of technology investment going to give Malaysia its mojo back?
GDP rose at an average of about 4 percent in the past decade, markedly slower than the heady days of 1990s and early 2000s. The federation also offered stability; one party dominated from independence through 2018. That was followed by rickety coalitions and a succession of leaders until Anwar forged a government of national unity in late 2022. It is anybody’s guess whether this team can last a full, five-year term.
The investment that flocked to Penang became a template for development and urbanization, as factory workers moved from rural villages to urban centers.
The trend was repeated throughout emerging markets. To keep the money coming, nations had to invest heavily in education and infrastructure, and develop regulatory regimes that supported this. Growth was there to be had, and societies were radically transformed.
Malaysia today is on the cusp of becoming a high-income nation, but is crawling across the finish line.
Another challenge: Southeast Asia’s semiconductor scene is concentrated around assembly, testing and packaging.
“Although the rise of AI offers vast business opportunities and growth potential for the semiconductor industry, the benefits are not evenly distributed along the chain,” Oxford Economics economist Sunny Liu wrote in a report. “As long as ASEAN countries remain focused on [assembly, testing and packaging] ATP, the benefits they derive will be limited compared to economies engaged in design and fabrication.”
The idea of neutrality, as framed by Anwar, is also a stretch. The clamor for a slice of the AI pie might bind countries more tightly to the US, or at least the US’ West Coast.
Diplomats might mouth bromides about not wanting to pick sides, but decision-by-decision officials would probably align with one camp more than the other. Straddling Washington and Beijing, something at which Malaysia has excelled, gets harder.
The country is right to woo AI. It cannot let growth slow too far, nor afford to let neighbors steal a march. Let us have some realism; mistakes have been made, and would again. Malaysia can talk a big game and not always come through.
Bad luck can also play a role. Mahathir began to develop plans for the Multimedia Super Corridor in 1996, a technology zone that stretched from Kuala Lumpur, through the new administrative capital and down to the airport. Then the nation endured a massive electricity failure. The premier was humiliated.
Anwar would be hoping a different historical analogy prevails. In 1975, a few years into Intel’s presence in Penang, a fire destroyed a huge part of the facility. Employees were determined to press on and fill orders. They were given T-shirts emblazoned with the words: “Intel Still Delivers.”
If Malaysia is in the market for a rally cry, it could do worse than emulate that sentiment.
Daniel Moss is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist covering Asian economies. Previously, he was executive editor for economics at Bloomberg News.
The first Donald Trump term was a boon for Taiwan. The administration regularized the arms sales process and enhanced bilateral ties. Taipei will not be so fortunate the second time around. Given recent events, Taiwan must proceed with the assumption that it cannot count on the United States to defend it — diplomatically or militarily — during the next four years. Early indications suggested otherwise. The nomination of Marco Rubio as US Secretary of State and the appointment of Mike Waltz as the national security advisor, both of whom have expressed full-throated support for Taiwan in the past, raised hopes that
There is nothing the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) could do to stop the tsunami-like mass recall campaign. KMT Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) reportedly said the party does not exclude the option of conditionally proposing a no-confidence vote against the premier, which the party later denied. Did an “actuary” like Chu finally come around to thinking it should get tough with the ruling party? The KMT says the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) is leading a minority government with only a 40 percent share of the vote. It has said that the DPP is out of touch with the electorate, has proposed a bloated
In an eloquently written piece published on Sunday, French-Taiwanese education and policy consultant Ninon Godefroy presents an interesting take on the Taiwanese character, as viewed from the eyes of an — at least partial — outsider. She muses that the non-assuming and quiet efficiency of a particularly Taiwanese approach to life and work is behind the global success stories of two very different Taiwanese institutions: Din Tai Fung and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC). Godefroy said that it is this “humble” approach that endears the nation to visitors, over and above any big ticket attractions that other countries may have
A media report has suggested that Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) was considering initiating a vote of no confidence in Premier Cho Jung-tai (卓榮泰) in a bid to “bring down the Cabinet.” The KMT has denied that this topic was ever discussed. Why might such a move have even be considered? It would have been absurd if it had seen the light of day — potentially leading to a mass loss of legislative seats for the KMT even without the recall petitions already under way. Today the second phase of the recall movement is to begin — which has
RSS