Punish the betrayers
This year marks 100 years since the founding of the Whampoa Military Academy (黃埔軍校), forerunner of today’s Republic of China (ROC) Military Academy. To mark the occasion, grand commemorative ceremonies have been organized on both sides of the Taiwan Strait.
Chi Lin-lien (季麟連), a former chairman of the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) Huang Fu-hsing (黃復興) branch, stirred up controversy when he went to China to take part in their commemorative activities.
To the knowledge of the Veterans Affairs Council, only a small number of retired generals were going to China, rather than a delegation, ROC Army Chief of Staff Lieutenant General Chen Chien-yi (陳建義) said. He warned those concerned not to fall for China’s cognitive warfare and “united front” strategy.
The rivalry between China and Taiwan about who the legitimate heir of the Whampoa Academy is, is meaningless, because the two are independent political entities. It is their own business how they celebrate the anniversary of their respective national military academies, and there is no need to compare them.
China using this opportunity to invite retired Taiwanese generals to take part in its celebrations is clearly intended to use those retirees as model figures for its “united front” strategy. It is disgraceful for veterans to insist on going when they know they are being used.
Imagine if retired Chinese generals were to come to Taiwan and take part in a military academy celebration or other political activities. Could they go back to China? If they went back, they would be severely punished or even shot.
How can Taiwan’s retired generals so openly go to China to participate in military celebrations while the two sides are still technically engaged in military hostilities? Is their behavior not tantamount to going over to the other side just for a pat on the head?
Military authorities and the Veterans Affairs Commission should tell retired generals not to take part in military or political activities in China.
If those retirees do not heed this advice, they should be punished in accordance with relevant laws, such as deducting their pensions or taking their pensions away altogether. This would ensure that retired generals who step out of line lose more than they gain.
Tien Fong-wen
New Taipei City
The first Donald Trump term was a boon for Taiwan. The administration regularized the arms sales process and enhanced bilateral ties. Taipei will not be so fortunate the second time around. Given recent events, Taiwan must proceed with the assumption that it cannot count on the United States to defend it — diplomatically or militarily — during the next four years. Early indications suggested otherwise. The nomination of Marco Rubio as US Secretary of State and the appointment of Mike Waltz as the national security advisor, both of whom have expressed full-throated support for Taiwan in the past, raised hopes that
There is nothing the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) could do to stop the tsunami-like mass recall campaign. KMT Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) reportedly said the party does not exclude the option of conditionally proposing a no-confidence vote against the premier, which the party later denied. Did an “actuary” like Chu finally come around to thinking it should get tough with the ruling party? The KMT says the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) is leading a minority government with only a 40 percent share of the vote. It has said that the DPP is out of touch with the electorate, has proposed a bloated
In an eloquently written piece published on Sunday, French-Taiwanese education and policy consultant Ninon Godefroy presents an interesting take on the Taiwanese character, as viewed from the eyes of an — at least partial — outsider. She muses that the non-assuming and quiet efficiency of a particularly Taiwanese approach to life and work is behind the global success stories of two very different Taiwanese institutions: Din Tai Fung and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC). Godefroy said that it is this “humble” approach that endears the nation to visitors, over and above any big ticket attractions that other countries may have
A media report has suggested that Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) was considering initiating a vote of no confidence in Premier Cho Jung-tai (卓榮泰) in a bid to “bring down the Cabinet.” The KMT has denied that this topic was ever discussed. Why might such a move have even be considered? It would have been absurd if it had seen the light of day — potentially leading to a mass loss of legislative seats for the KMT even without the recall petitions already under way. Today the second phase of the recall movement is to begin — which has
RSS