The Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) on June 6 reported the first instance of a member of a Taiwanese tour group traveling in China being detained for several days by Chinese authorities, and warned Taiwanese to carefully assess whether traveling to China is necessary and to be vigilant about personal safety.
The person was detained because they had worked in a “sensitive” profession before retirement, local media cited anonymous sources as saying.
The case was revealed only a day after another Taiwanese man, surnamed Lin (林), posted on Threads that when he displayed his photo books at an arts and books exhibition in Nanjing on May 31, he was taken away for interrogation by Chinese police. They handcuffed him, forced him to remove his clothes, took his fingerprints and a blood sample, and asked personal questions about his family and sexual orientation, before releasing him at midnight.
BBC News Chinese reported that the police told Lin he was put under administrative detention for allegedly selling obscene images.
The MAC has repeatedly told the public to avoid unnecessary visits to China, saying that its expanded national security laws, including an updated counterespionage law and its revised state secrets law, expanded the definition of “sensitive information,” but is “highly vague” and could mean people might be breaking the law at any time.
The Straits Exchange Foundation in August last year also said that there are many differences between the legal systems of Taiwan and China, and what is ordinary in Taiwan might be deemed illegal in China, so visitors should make adequate preparations and be aware of personal safety risks before traveling to China.
That view is shared with several countries.
The US Department of State issued a level 3 travel advisory for China in 2020, which is still in place, which states: “Reconsider travel due to the arbitrary enforcement of local laws, including in relation to exit bans, and the risk of wrongful detentions.”
The UK’s travel advice for China also says that China’s authorities have detained foreign nationals who break national security laws, that “national security” and “national interest” could be interpreted broadly, and that “activity that happened outside of China — including online activity — could fall under the scope of mainland legislation” and “there is a risk of arbitrary detention.”
While cases of arbitrary arrests of Taiwanese in China have been reported multiple times, including democracy advocates Lee Ming-che (李明哲), Lee Meng-chu (李孟居) and Yang Chih-yuan (楊智淵), many Taiwanese remain unconcerned, as they do not believe they would be targeted as long as they are not high-profile political activists and do not commit obvious crimes.
Many comments on reports about Taiwanese detained in China were also uncompassionate, with people online saying they have never encountered any trouble in China, so it must be due to the victims’ immoral behavior or criminal activities.
The public’s overconfidence is concerning, as other cases have proven that foreigners in China have been interrogated on a wide range of issues or detained by Chinese authorities for allegedly breaching its national security laws.
An I-Kuan Tao (一貫道, a salvationist religion) follower was also detained last year for bringing books promoting vegetarianism to China.
If many Taiwanese are becoming numb to the repeated warnings, in the same way many are becoming used to China’s daily military activities near Taiwan, or are wrapped up in a false sense of security from pro-China politicians and influencers promoting China’s friendliness to the world, then the government might need to rethink its approach to informing the public of the risks of going to or staying in China.
In the US’ National Security Strategy (NSS) report released last month, US President Donald Trump offered his interpretation of the Monroe Doctrine. The “Trump Corollary,” presented on page 15, is a distinctly aggressive rebranding of the more than 200-year-old foreign policy position. Beyond reasserting the sovereignty of the western hemisphere against foreign intervention, the document centers on energy and strategic assets, and attempts to redraw the map of the geopolitical landscape more broadly. It is clear that Trump no longer sees the western hemisphere as a peaceful backyard, but rather as the frontier of a new Cold War. In particular,
When it became clear that the world was entering a new era with a radical change in the US’ global stance in US President Donald Trump’s second term, many in Taiwan were concerned about what this meant for the nation’s defense against China. Instability and disruption are dangerous. Chaos introduces unknowns. There was a sense that the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) might have a point with its tendency not to trust the US. The world order is certainly changing, but concerns about the implications for Taiwan of this disruption left many blind to how the same forces might also weaken
As the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) races toward its 2027 modernization goals, most analysts fixate on ship counts, missile ranges and artificial intelligence. Those metrics matter — but they obscure a deeper vulnerability. The true future of the PLA, and by extension Taiwan’s security, might hinge less on hardware than on whether the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) can preserve ideological loyalty inside its own armed forces. Iran’s 1979 revolution demonstrated how even a technologically advanced military can collapse when the social environment surrounding it shifts. That lesson has renewed relevance as fresh unrest shakes Iran today — and it should
As the new year dawns, Taiwan faces a range of external uncertainties that could impact the safety and prosperity of its people and reverberate in its politics. Here are a few key questions that could spill over into Taiwan in the year ahead. WILL THE AI BUBBLE POP? The global AI boom supported Taiwan’s significant economic expansion in 2025. Taiwan’s economy grew over 7 percent and set records for exports, imports, and trade surplus. There is a brewing debate among investors about whether the AI boom will carry forward into 2026. Skeptics warn that AI-led global equity markets are overvalued and overleveraged
RSS