Political responsibility
The Executive Yuan on Thursday last week sent amendments to the Act Governing the Legislative Yuan’s Power (立法院職權行使法) and revisions of the Criminal Code back to lawmakers for reconsideration. Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (傅?萁) responded by asking if Premier Cho Jung-tai (卓榮泰) would step down should the request for reconsideration fail.
I believe Cho would have been prepared to accept the possible outcome of resignation, but I cannot help but ask, would legislators in the blue and white camp have been prepared to accept the implications of their actions?
Taiwan is governed by the rule of law. Politicians need not resort to confrontational methods. So long as issues are handled according to the law, it does not matter who can shout the loudest. Moreover, as stipulated by Article 3 Clause 2 Section 2 of the Additional Articles of the Constitution of the Republic of China, “Should the Executive Yuan deem a statutory, budgetary, or treaty bill passed by the Legislative Yuan difficult to execute, the Executive Yuan may, with the approval of the president of the Republic and within 10 days of the bill’s submission to the Executive Yuan, request the Legislative Yuan to reconsider the bill.”
Of course, the legislature could also cite Section 3 to propose a no-confidence vote against the premier. If the no-confidence vote were to pass, the premier would be required to tender his resignation within 10 days and simultaneously request for the president to dissolve the Legislative Yuan.
In politics, duty must not be neglected. The manner and behavior of politicians and the policies they adopt should originate from a sense of duty to the public.
The Executive Yuan’s actions exhibit the government’s firm conviction and feeling of duty in its approach to policy. Even in the wake of criticism and pressure from all sides, they have upheld their position and courageously bore their responsibility.
If the reform bill passed by the legislators of the blue and white camps is truly a step in the right direction, should they not also have the courage to bear political responsibility and face the possibility of dissolution and a new election?
Hsieh Chih-chieh
Taipei
In the US’ National Security Strategy (NSS) report released last month, US President Donald Trump offered his interpretation of the Monroe Doctrine. The “Trump Corollary,” presented on page 15, is a distinctly aggressive rebranding of the more than 200-year-old foreign policy position. Beyond reasserting the sovereignty of the western hemisphere against foreign intervention, the document centers on energy and strategic assets, and attempts to redraw the map of the geopolitical landscape more broadly. It is clear that Trump no longer sees the western hemisphere as a peaceful backyard, but rather as the frontier of a new Cold War. In particular,
As the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) races toward its 2027 modernization goals, most analysts fixate on ship counts, missile ranges and artificial intelligence. Those metrics matter — but they obscure a deeper vulnerability. The true future of the PLA, and by extension Taiwan’s security, might hinge less on hardware than on whether the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) can preserve ideological loyalty inside its own armed forces. Iran’s 1979 revolution demonstrated how even a technologically advanced military can collapse when the social environment surrounding it shifts. That lesson has renewed relevance as fresh unrest shakes Iran today — and it should
The last foreign delegation Nicolas Maduro met before he went to bed Friday night (January 2) was led by China’s top Latin America diplomat. “I had a pleasant meeting with Qiu Xiaoqi (邱小琪), Special Envoy of President Xi Jinping (習近平),” Venezuela’s soon-to-be ex-president tweeted on Telegram, “and we reaffirmed our commitment to the strategic relationship that is progressing and strengthening in various areas for building a multipolar world of development and peace.” Judging by how minutely the Central Intelligence Agency was monitoring Maduro’s every move on Friday, President Trump himself was certainly aware of Maduro’s felicitations to his Chinese guest. Just
On today’s page, Masahiro Matsumura, a professor of international politics and national security at St Andrew’s University in Osaka, questions the viability and advisability of the government’s proposed “T-Dome” missile defense system. Matsumura writes that Taiwan’s military budget would be better allocated elsewhere, and cautions against the temptation to allow politics to trump strategic sense. What he does not do is question whether Taiwan needs to increase its defense capabilities. “Given the accelerating pace of Beijing’s military buildup and political coercion ... [Taiwan] cannot afford inaction,” he writes. A rational, robust debate over the specifics, not the scale or the necessity,