President William Lai (賴清德) sat down for an interview with Time magazine on May 30. It was published on Wednesday.
Lai’s responses were a study in the carefully configured presentation of himself as a rational, non-partisan and measured elected head of an already sovereign state, and of Taiwan as a reliable member of the international community.
He consistently steered the conversation away from a focus on cross-strait relations, situating the context of Taiwan’s relations with China as being an engagement with just another country.
Although there was recognition that China presents a unique problem to Taiwan, there was little mention of war, even versing China’s threat in terms of lawfare, angling away from the threat of military invasion. Lai’s answers were carefully considered. When one reads between the lines, the overarching theme was evident: The global conversation around Taiwan must move beyond an obsession of the country in terms of its relationship to China.
Of the 16 questions in the main interview that made it into the published text, 12 directly referred to China, and one was a question about the actions of opposition Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislators which provided context for follow-up questions referring to visits by KMT figures to Beijing.
Still, Lai remained insistent on speaking of Taiwan within the wider global context.
Asked about reports of a discussion about Taiwan by US Secretary of State Antony Blinken and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平), Lai urged Xi to understand that “conflict in the Taiwan Strait and disruptions to peace and stability in the Indo-Pacific region” would not be accepted by the international community.
On China’s economic problems, he chose not to mention China’s economic coercion against Taiwan, saying instead that economic relations between the two countries are the result of divisions of labor within global supply chains. He then turned the discussion to a comparison of the problems of the authoritarian model of state control over the economy, and blaming the drying up of foreign direct investment into China on Beijing’s military expansionism, which has impacted regional peace and stability.
On the KMT legislators’ visit to China, Lai said that they should recognize and respond to China’s core objectives of annexing Taiwan, which was the only time he mentioned those objectives.
The idea of “recognition” emerged as a sub-theme. The interviewer broached this initially with reference to the shifting of diplomatic recognition from Taipei to Beijing by Nauru only 48 hours after Lai’s election victory. Lai remained magnanimous, refusing to blame Nauru, but more importantly subtly leveraged the meaning of “recognition,” implying that China’s diplomatic theft would have no bearing on “Taiwan’s status as a beacon of freedom and a bastion of democracy in the world.” This is the point: While Taiwan’s number of diplomatic allies is falling, Taiwan’s profile, recognition and acceptance in the international community as a whole are increasing.
Lai used the interview to reiterate significant points from his inaugural address, but in a forum that would likely reach an audience outside of Taiwan: The People’s Republic of China (PRC) must recognize that the Republic of China (ROC) exists, and it should be sincere in building exchanges with the democratically elected government of Taiwan; that the ROC and PRC are not subordinate to each other; and that according to international law, irrespective of official recognition by individual states, Taiwan is already a sovereign and independent country.
His measured responses were a careful iteration of the approach Lai intends to maintain in office.
His calm, reasonable delivery will no doubt be in stark contrast to Beijing’s inevitable histrionic response.
In a meeting with Haitian Minister of Foreign Affairs Jean-Victor Harvel Jean-Baptiste on Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) vowed to continue providing aid to Haiti. Taiwan supports Haiti with development in areas such as agriculture, healthcare and education through initiatives run by the Taiwan International Cooperation and Development Fund (ICDF). The nation it has established itself as a responsible, peaceful and innovative actor committed to global cooperation, Jean-Baptiste said. Testimonies such as this give Taiwan a voice in the global community, where it often goes unheard. Taiwan’s reception in Haiti also contrasts with how China has been perceived in countries in the region
On Monday, Minister of Foreign Affairs Lin Chia-lung (林佳龍) delivered a welcome speech at the ILA-ASIL Asia-Pacific Research Forum, addressing more than 50 international law experts from more than 20 countries. With an aim to refute the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) claim to be the successor to the 1945 Chinese government and its assertion that China acquired sovereignty over Taiwan, Lin articulated three key legal positions in his speech: First, the Cairo Declaration and Potsdam Declaration were not legally binding instruments and thus had no legal effect for territorial disposition. All determinations must be based on the San Francisco Peace
On April 13, I stood in Nanan (南安), a Bunun village in southern Hualien County’s Jhuosi Township (卓溪), absorbing lessons from elders who spoke of the forest not as backdrop, but as living presence — relational, sacred and full of spirit. I was there with fellow international students from National Dong Hwa University (NDHU) participating in a field trip that would become one of the most powerful educational experiences of my life. Ten days later, a news report in the Taipei Times shattered the spell: “Formosan black bear shot and euthanized in Hualien” (April 23, page 2). A tagged bear, previously released
While global headlines often focus on the military balance in the Taiwan Strait or the promise of US intervention, there is a quieter, less visible battle that might ultimately define Taiwan’s future: the battle for intelligence autonomy. Despite widespread global adherence to the “one China” policy, Taiwan has steadily cultivated a unique political identity and security strategy grounded in self-reliance. This approach is not merely symbolic; it is a pragmatic necessity in the face of Beijing’s growing political warfare and infiltration campaigns, many orchestrated by the Chinese Ministry of State Security (MSS). Taiwan’s intelligence community did not emerge overnight. Its roots
RSS