TPP letting voters down
The Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) and its chairman, Ko Wen-je (柯文哲), have turned their backs on the party’s younger supporters, with its legislators acting as lackeys for the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT).
Last year, TPP legislator-at-large Huang Kuo-chang (黃國昌) quit the New Power Party, which he founded, to join the TPP. The switch contradicted Huang’s original stand against the Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement and confused New Power Party and TPP supporters.
Luckily for them, the TPP secured eight seats in the legislature and plays a key role in decisionmaking, as neither the KMT nor the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) won an outright majority.
However, what did these key players do?
When deciding on a legislative speaker, none of the TPP’s lawmakers voted for any of the KMT or DPP nominees, while at the same time saying they would assess candidates’ support for transparency and oversight reforms.
Consequently, the KMT’s nominee, Han Kuo-yu (韓國瑜), was elected speaker.
TPP legislators abstained from a vote on pension reform on the reconsideration of a KMT proposal, resulting in it proceeding to a review.
However, rolling back pension reform would increase the burden on younger generations, as under the bill retired public officials, teachers and military personnel would be eligible for a monthly pension stipend of NT$70,000.
As for the legislative reforms, Huang abstained from a vote when the KMT motioned to adjourn a meeting in which the DPP’s proposed reforms to the legislature were supposed to be reviewed.
In these cases, the TPP should have held the key to the passage or rejection of policies.
However, the party has done nothing but abstain from voting.
Pension reform concerns young Taiwanese, but the TPP, as a so-called representative of younger voters, has not dared speak out on it.
Ko has said that pension reform is not an issue with a yes or no answer, sidetracking the party’s young supporters by hiding the truth that he does not intend to stick up for their rights.
Young Taiwanese have been duped by Ko and Huang.
The two have been talking nonsense to solicit more support from younger voters. TPP legislators skipped voting, giving essential approval to every policy the KMT put forth.
The truth is that the “white” camp is not a neutral electoral force. Younger voters have probably woken up by now and feel regret.
Ko has said that the pan-blue and pan-green camps are rotten, but he himself has often gone back on his word and has spoken well of them just to win more votes.
Now, his legislators have become bootlickers for the blue camp and are forming an alliance with KMT Legislator and caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (傅?萁).
Lin Han
Taipei
The first Donald Trump term was a boon for Taiwan. The administration regularized the arms sales process and enhanced bilateral ties. Taipei will not be so fortunate the second time around. Given recent events, Taiwan must proceed with the assumption that it cannot count on the United States to defend it — diplomatically or militarily — during the next four years. Early indications suggested otherwise. The nomination of Marco Rubio as US Secretary of State and the appointment of Mike Waltz as the national security advisor, both of whom have expressed full-throated support for Taiwan in the past, raised hopes that
Whether in terms of market commonality or resource similarity, South Korea’s Samsung Electronics Co is the biggest competitor of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC). The two companies have agreed to set up factories in the US and are also recipients of subsidies from the US CHIPS and Science Act, which was signed into law by former US president Joe Biden. However, changes in the market competitiveness of the two companies clearly reveal the context behind TSMC’s investments in the US. As US semiconductor giant Intel Corp has faced continuous delays developing its advanced processes, the world’s two major wafer foundries, TSMC and
Authorities last week revoked the residency permit of a Chinese social media influencer surnamed Liu (劉), better known by her online channel name Yaya in Taiwan (亞亞在台灣), who has more than 440,000 followers online and is living in Taiwan with a marriage-based residency permit, for her “reunification by force” comments. She was asked to leave the country in 10 days. The National Immigration Agency (NIA) on Tuesday last week announced the decision, citing the influencer’s several controversial public comments, including saying that “China does not need any other reason to reunify Taiwan with force” and “why is it [China] hesitant
We are witnessing a sea change in the government’s approach to China, from one of reasonable, low-key reluctance at rocking the boat to a collapse of pretense over and patience in Beijing’s willful intransigence. Finally, we are seeing a more common sense approach in the face of active shows of hostility from a foreign power. According to Article 2 of the 2020 Anti-Infiltration Act (反滲透法), a “foreign hostile force” is defined as “countries, political entities or groups that are at war with or are engaged in a military standoff with the Republic of China [ROC]. The same stipulation applies to
RSS