With tensions between China and the Philippines heating up, face-offs have not only occurred in the South China Sea, but the Philippines also skipped the Western Pacific Naval Symposium — which received delegations from 29 countries, including the US — hosted by China.
Lately, many Chinese exchange students have flocked to Cagayan province in the northern Philippine island of Luzon, leading to a surging enrollment in private universities in Tuguegarao City.
The unexpected influx of Chinese students might trigger concern for the Philippine government as the province hosts two military bases that could be used by US troops under the two-nation Enhanced Defense Cooperation Agreement.
However, Tuguegarao Mayor Maila Ting Que told Philippines-based ABS-CBN news station in a virtual interview: “We’ve been fighting so hard to promote educational tourism, now it is being eroded, it is being questioned.”
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) always stirs up divisions in other countries, which can be seen in Taiwan, as some city mayors and county commissioners have acted similarly.
As the world’s most populous country, China takes advantage of its population to infiltrate other countries.
More than 46,000 Chinese “stowaways” have entered the US in the past two years, and many of them are adults, fueling fears that the CCP might send undercover personnel or troops to the US, Republican presidential candidate and former US president Donald Trump said in an interview early this month.
Official data showed that the number of Chinese asylum seekers in the US was increasing, with US border patrol officers arresting 182 Chinese at the southern border on Tuesday alone. The number of Chinese stowaways has surpassed the number of Mexican citizens that pass through the San Diego border crossing. Last year, 37,000 Chinese were arrested at the southern border — 50 times the number from two years ago.
Routes and approaches for illegal immigration have been publicly posted on Douyin (抖音) without any prohibition by the Chinese government, making it hard to distinguish between those who are legitimate asylum seekers from those assigned with “special tasks.”
China has sent “stowaways” for decades using different routes, and the US government should investigate whether those Chinese in the US who have obtained political asylum are opposed to China or lying to the US authorities.
CIA Director William Burns on Thursday last week said that the US still has several challenges to contend with regarding China, as Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) is “determined in the course of his political lifetime to control Taiwan.”
It “doesn’t mean that he’s planning to invade tomorrow or next month or next year, but it means we have to take very seriously that ambition,” he added.
FBI Director Christopher Wray also warned on the same day that CCP-sponsored cyberactors have positioned themselves and are waiting to launch devastating attacks on critical US infrastructure.
With similar opinions being expressed by two major US intelligence agencies, has the US become disillusioned with China?
Several US officials have visited China recently to communicate with the CCP, and US Secretary of State Antony Blinken is currently on his second visit to China in less than a year.
The US’ behavior is confusing. Does it want to make a false show of civility or does it want to sincerely collaborate with China, aiming to persuade Xi to stop oppressing Taiwan and supporting Russia? Nobody knows.
Paul Lin is a political commentator.
Translated by Chien Yan-ru
The first Donald Trump term was a boon for Taiwan. The administration regularized the arms sales process and enhanced bilateral ties. Taipei will not be so fortunate the second time around. Given recent events, Taiwan must proceed with the assumption that it cannot count on the United States to defend it — diplomatically or militarily — during the next four years. Early indications suggested otherwise. The nomination of Marco Rubio as US Secretary of State and the appointment of Mike Waltz as the national security advisor, both of whom have expressed full-throated support for Taiwan in the past, raised hopes that
There is nothing the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) could do to stop the tsunami-like mass recall campaign. KMT Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) reportedly said the party does not exclude the option of conditionally proposing a no-confidence vote against the premier, which the party later denied. Did an “actuary” like Chu finally come around to thinking it should get tough with the ruling party? The KMT says the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) is leading a minority government with only a 40 percent share of the vote. It has said that the DPP is out of touch with the electorate, has proposed a bloated
In an eloquently written piece published on Sunday, French-Taiwanese education and policy consultant Ninon Godefroy presents an interesting take on the Taiwanese character, as viewed from the eyes of an — at least partial — outsider. She muses that the non-assuming and quiet efficiency of a particularly Taiwanese approach to life and work is behind the global success stories of two very different Taiwanese institutions: Din Tai Fung and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC). Godefroy said that it is this “humble” approach that endears the nation to visitors, over and above any big ticket attractions that other countries may have
A media report has suggested that Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) was considering initiating a vote of no confidence in Premier Cho Jung-tai (卓榮泰) in a bid to “bring down the Cabinet.” The KMT has denied that this topic was ever discussed. Why might such a move have even be considered? It would have been absurd if it had seen the light of day — potentially leading to a mass loss of legislative seats for the KMT even without the recall petitions already under way. Today the second phase of the recall movement is to begin — which has
RSS