The global artificial intelligence (AI) arms race is heating up, but AI’s development poses risks that governments around the world are seriously concerned about.
The European Parliament recently approved the EU AI Act — the first-ever legal framework on AI — which aims to address the risks of AI, including discrimination, privacy invasion and other potential problems.
AI emotion recognition would be prohibited in workplaces and education institutions, the EU legislation said. High-risk AI practices, such as utilizing AI to filter job applicants, would also be forbidden.
Some argue that applying overly stringent regulations on AI puts obstacles in the way of its development.
However, AI has the potential to cause severe problems just because of one single mistake. A car crash due to an error in a self-driving car is an example.
Underlying moral and ethical issues such as algorithm bias or criminal exploitation of AI technologies remain unresolved.
Deepfakes were originally designed to help complete the signal of an image, but criminals have co-opted the technology for more nefarious uses, such as the creation of fake celebrity porn.
Taiwan is the country most impacted by the dissemination of false information by foreign sources and has topped the Foreign Governments Dissemination of False Information indicator for a decade. With the increase in AI deepfakes, fake videos are everywhere, influencing public opinion and increasing cybersecurity concerns.
This being the case, how are we to ensure a safe AI industry in Taiwan? After all, we know it is easy for people with bad intentions to use AI to achieve their objectives. That poses a threat to our national security.
AI is a double-edged sword. It benefits people, but also has a negative impact on the human world. That is why governments and global institutions are taking steps to regulate AI.
In Australia, the government announced that it would monitor AI to prevent improper content generated by it. In the UK, the government has established the AI Safety Institute, the world’s first AI safety organization.
The EU AI Act, on the other hand is more comprehensive and practical than any other similar existing law or regulations. It would be a stepping stone for Western countries to build a legal framework for AI since the US still has implemented little AI legislation. It is also believed to be effective for countries and industries inside and outside the EU.
Taiwan plays a crucial role in the global information and communications technology supply chain.
It is time for our government to learn from other countries and consider how to legislate AI so that we can ensure the safe and sustainable development of the AI industry in Taiwan.
Dino Wei works in the information technology industry.
Translated by Hsieh Yi-ching
The first Donald Trump term was a boon for Taiwan. The administration regularized the arms sales process and enhanced bilateral ties. Taipei will not be so fortunate the second time around. Given recent events, Taiwan must proceed with the assumption that it cannot count on the United States to defend it — diplomatically or militarily — during the next four years. Early indications suggested otherwise. The nomination of Marco Rubio as US Secretary of State and the appointment of Mike Waltz as the national security advisor, both of whom have expressed full-throated support for Taiwan in the past, raised hopes that
There is nothing the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) could do to stop the tsunami-like mass recall campaign. KMT Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) reportedly said the party does not exclude the option of conditionally proposing a no-confidence vote against the premier, which the party later denied. Did an “actuary” like Chu finally come around to thinking it should get tough with the ruling party? The KMT says the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) is leading a minority government with only a 40 percent share of the vote. It has said that the DPP is out of touch with the electorate, has proposed a bloated
Authorities last week revoked the residency permit of a Chinese social media influencer surnamed Liu (劉), better known by her online channel name Yaya in Taiwan (亞亞在台灣), who has more than 440,000 followers online and is living in Taiwan with a marriage-based residency permit, for her “reunification by force” comments. She was asked to leave the country in 10 days. The National Immigration Agency (NIA) on Tuesday last week announced the decision, citing the influencer’s several controversial public comments, including saying that “China does not need any other reason to reunify Taiwan with force” and “why is it [China] hesitant
A media report has suggested that Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) was considering initiating a vote of no confidence in Premier Cho Jung-tai (卓榮泰) in a bid to “bring down the Cabinet.” The KMT has denied that this topic was ever discussed. Why might such a move have even be considered? It would have been absurd if it had seen the light of day — potentially leading to a mass loss of legislative seats for the KMT even without the recall petitions already under way. Today the second phase of the recall movement is to begin — which has
RSS