Fu is not suitable for role
The legislature is about to form eight standing committees and hold elections for committee members. Word has it that the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus convener Fu Kun-chi (傅崐萁) has been selected for placement on the Judiciary and Organic Laws and Statutes committee.
Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Wang Ting-yu (王定宇) said that the selection of legislative committee members should be done while avoiding conflicts of interests. Aside from relying on political parties’ self-discipline and personal self-control, society at large must also have high standards for the new legislature.
Fu has a long list of criminal sentences and prison time served, including eight months for insider trading; two years and 10 months for manipulating shares in KPT and other companies; and six months for faking his divorce from Hsu Chen-wei (徐榛蔚) during his tenure as Hualien County commissioner to allow her to serve alongside him as deputy county commissioner.
How can Fu, with his criminal record, be selected for this committee, which operates in the name of upholding justice, carrying out investigations and prosecutions, as well as the judgement of crimes?
This is an absolute farce. Is this something Taiwanese can just sit back and accept?
Budgets for judicial government units, as well as legal stipulations or amendments must all be approved by this committee.
Is Fu capable of doing this with impartiality?
With Fu in a position of hegemonic power, do not tell me that he would not use his authority to exact revenge on people in the higher courts and investigators.
During a committee tenure, higher tiers of the judicial branch and heads of investigation would be made to line up and accept Fu’s menacing interrogations, abuse or unreasonable demands.
Such actions would not only be directed at judicial system workers who keep the public interest in mind; the prestige of a fair and just judiciary would evaporate into nothing and public sentiment would take a serious hit.
KMT Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) and legislators should be asked whether they approve of Fu’s disregard for public perception and his self-serving behavior. We should remind them that the public is watching the KMT.
Chi An-hsiu
Taipei
Jan. 1 marks a decade since China repealed its one-child policy. Just 10 days before, Peng Peiyun (彭珮雲), who long oversaw the often-brutal enforcement of China’s family-planning rules, died at the age of 96, having never been held accountable for her actions. Obituaries praised Peng for being “reform-minded,” even though, in practice, she only perpetuated an utterly inhumane policy, whose consequences have barely begun to materialize. It was Vice Premier Chen Muhua (陳慕華) who first proposed the one-child policy in 1979, with the endorsement of China’s then-top leaders, Chen Yun (陳雲) and Deng Xiaoping (鄧小平), as a means of avoiding the
In the US’ National Security Strategy (NSS) report released last month, US President Donald Trump offered his interpretation of the Monroe Doctrine. The “Trump Corollary,” presented on page 15, is a distinctly aggressive rebranding of the more than 200-year-old foreign policy position. Beyond reasserting the sovereignty of the western hemisphere against foreign intervention, the document centers on energy and strategic assets, and attempts to redraw the map of the geopolitical landscape more broadly. It is clear that Trump no longer sees the western hemisphere as a peaceful backyard, but rather as the frontier of a new Cold War. In particular,
As the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) races toward its 2027 modernization goals, most analysts fixate on ship counts, missile ranges and artificial intelligence. Those metrics matter — but they obscure a deeper vulnerability. The true future of the PLA, and by extension Taiwan’s security, might hinge less on hardware than on whether the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) can preserve ideological loyalty inside its own armed forces. Iran’s 1979 revolution demonstrated how even a technologically advanced military can collapse when the social environment surrounding it shifts. That lesson has renewed relevance as fresh unrest shakes Iran today — and it should
The last foreign delegation Nicolas Maduro met before he went to bed Friday night (January 2) was led by China’s top Latin America diplomat. “I had a pleasant meeting with Qiu Xiaoqi (邱小琪), Special Envoy of President Xi Jinping (習近平),” Venezuela’s soon-to-be ex-president tweeted on Telegram, “and we reaffirmed our commitment to the strategic relationship that is progressing and strengthening in various areas for building a multipolar world of development and peace.” Judging by how minutely the Central Intelligence Agency was monitoring Maduro’s every move on Friday, President Trump himself was certainly aware of Maduro’s felicitations to his Chinese guest. Just