In the run-up to the presidential and legislative elections, Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) Chairman and presidential candidate Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) called some opinion polls “bogus.” Rumors circulated that the election process and results might be unfair. These rumors, which made many TPP supporters feel uneasy, have grown louder since the election results were announced. It is reminiscent of the unrest that followed former president Chen Shui-bian’s (陳水扁) narrow-margin re-election in 2004. One video alleging vote rigging has received more than 2 million views. Such a video could seriously tarnish the good image Taiwan’s voting system has attained over the course of many years.
Many unscientific opinion polls were carried out before the election and they likely engendered unrealistic confidence in Ko’s supporters. Since the results have come out, no one is taking responsibility or being held responsible for those fake opinion polls. Ko’s supporters are still highly strung. At such a time, the main concern for Ko and the TPP should not be about who is to become the next legislative speaker.
Instead, they should urge their supporters to calm down and stop falsely accusing the nation’s election workers of committing fraud. The public’s confidence in democracy should not be sacrificed for the sake of a single party’s political interests.
In the past, no matter which candidate had to make a concession speech, they would congratulate their successful opponent and respect the result. Even in the 2020 presidential election, Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) candidate Han Kuo-yu (韓國瑜) made a speech conceding defeat, congratulating his Democratic Progressive Party rival, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文), and promised to abide by the result. In contrast, Ko’s post-defeat speech hardly mentioned these things. Just as his supporters were sowing election doubts, he appeared to egg them on by blaming his defeat on the election procedure and its lack of absentee voting. The TPP claims to view things in a scientific and rational manner. From this perspective, news reports identified problems at fewer than 20 of the 17,000 ballot-counting stations — far too few to impact the elections.
The book How Democracies Die by US professors Steven Levitsky and Daniel Ziblatt says how, in past US presidential elections, the Republican and Democratic parties maintained a degree of institutional autonomy. They respected the results, avoided raising unfounded doubts about the election process and did not view their opponents as treasonous enemies. The authors wrote that this unspoken rule remained unbroken until former president Donald Trump was elected.
By the same token, now that the election results have been announced from ballot-counting stations staffed, among others, by hundreds of TPP supporters whom the party encouraged to serve as scrutineers, Ko and the TPP should play their proper part by urging their supporters to keep calm, respect the democratic process and accept the election results.
Ko and the TPP seriously harm society with their spurious accusations of vote-rigging. They might want to explain to their supporters why some opinion polls were so different from the election results, but they should not drag down the entire democratic system.
Furthermore, how, in the current atmosphere, are they to set things right for all those election workers who spent an entire Saturday in a polling booth, yet still have to suffer unjustified accusations of vote-rigging? How do they intend to restore people’s faith in the democratic system, and will they ever apologize to their electoral rivals and to their own supporters?
Ko Chia-wei is a former president of the National Chengchi University Student Association.
Translated by Julian Clegg
Taiwan’s higher education system is facing an existential crisis. As the demographic drop-off continues to empty classrooms, universities across the island are locked in a desperate battle for survival, international student recruitment and crucial Ministry of Education funding. To win this battle, institutions have turned to what seems like an objective measure of quality: global university rankings. Unfortunately, this chase is a costly illusion, and taxpayers are footing the bill. In the past few years, the goalposts have shifted from pure research output to “sustainability” and “societal impact,” largely driven by commercial metrics such as the UK-based Times Higher Education (THE) Impact
History might remember 2026, not 2022, as the year artificial intelligence (AI) truly changed everything. ChatGPT’s launch was a product moment. What is happening now is an anthropological moment: AI is no longer merely answering questions. It is now taking initiative and learning from others to get things done, behaving less like software and more like a colleague. The economic consequence is the rise of the one-person company — a structure anticipated in the 2024 book The Choices Amid Great Changes, which I coauthored. The real target of AI is not labor. It is hierarchy. When AI sharply reduces the cost
The inter-Korean relationship, long defined by national division, offers the clearest mirror within East Asia for cross-strait relations. Yet even there, reunification language is breaking down. The South Korean government disclosed on Wednesday last week that North Korea’s constitutional revision in March had deleted references to reunification and added a territorial clause defining its border with South Korea. South Korea is also seriously debating whether national reunification with North Korea is still necessary. On April 27, South Korean President Lee Jae-myung marked the eighth anniversary of the Panmunjom Declaration, the 2018 inter-Korean agreement in which the two Koreas pledged to
I wrote this before US President Donald Trump embarked on his uneventful state visit to China on Thursday. So, I shall confine my observations to the joint US-Philippine military exercise of April 20 through May 8, known collectively as “Balikatan 2026.” This year’s Balikatan was notable for its “firsts.” First, it was conducted primarily with Taiwan in mind, not the Philippines or even the South China Sea. It also showed that in the Pacific, America’s alliance network is still robust. Allies are enthusiastic about America’s renewed leadership in the region. Nine decades ago, in 1936, America had neither military strength
RSS